‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Toni, Andressa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/42637
Resumo: This research explores the phonotactic grammar of CCV (Consonant1+Consonant2+Vowel) branching onsets in Brazilian Portuguese by investigating their combinatorial properties and constraints. The study measures the acceptability judgment of native speakers about high (/tɾ, pɾ, bɾ/), low (/dɾ, kl, gl/) and marginal (/tl, dl, vl/) frequency consonant clusters, comparing them with unattested unmarked clusters (rising sonority, /bn, ʃɾ/) and unattested marked clusters (descending sonority, /lb, řt/; plateaus /xl, ft/). Our aim is to outline the speaker’s phonotactic intuition, analyzing the effects of the Lexicon (frequency) and Phonology (Sound Scale) in the phonotactic grammar of BP. The results show distinct acceptability judgements between high and low frequency sequences, pointing to a Lexicon effect. However, zero frequency sequences also present different acceptability judgments, due to the Sonority Scale effectThese results point to an interrelationship between Phonotactics↔Lexicon. /tl, dl, vl/, in turn, are different from attested and unattested sequences, revealing a marginal character. The following phonotactic gradient scale was found: /pɾ, bɾ/≻/tɾ/≻/gl/≻/dɾ/≻/kl/≻/vl, dl/≻/tl/ ≻/ʃɾ, bn/≻/ft/ ≻/řt/≻/xl/≻/lb/.
id PUC_RS-14_a864b93a1866df774229618599796881
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42637
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese‘Bnafe soa melhor que Shrabe?’: Julgamento de aceitabilidade de sequências consonantais frequentes, pouco frequentes, marginais e ausentes no Português BrasileiroFonologia de Laboratóriofonotaxesílabaataques ramificadosjulgamento de aceitabilidadeLaboratory Phonologyphonotacticssyllablebranching onsetsacceptability judgementsThis research explores the phonotactic grammar of CCV (Consonant1+Consonant2+Vowel) branching onsets in Brazilian Portuguese by investigating their combinatorial properties and constraints. The study measures the acceptability judgment of native speakers about high (/tɾ, pɾ, bɾ/), low (/dɾ, kl, gl/) and marginal (/tl, dl, vl/) frequency consonant clusters, comparing them with unattested unmarked clusters (rising sonority, /bn, ʃɾ/) and unattested marked clusters (descending sonority, /lb, řt/; plateaus /xl, ft/). Our aim is to outline the speaker’s phonotactic intuition, analyzing the effects of the Lexicon (frequency) and Phonology (Sound Scale) in the phonotactic grammar of BP. The results show distinct acceptability judgements between high and low frequency sequences, pointing to a Lexicon effect. However, zero frequency sequences also present different acceptability judgments, due to the Sonority Scale effectThese results point to an interrelationship between Phonotactics↔Lexicon. /tl, dl, vl/, in turn, are different from attested and unattested sequences, revealing a marginal character. The following phonotactic gradient scale was found: /pɾ, bɾ/≻/tɾ/≻/gl/≻/dɾ/≻/kl/≻/vl, dl/≻/tl/ ≻/ʃɾ, bn/≻/ft/ ≻/řt/≻/xl/≻/lb/.Esta pesquisa explora a gramática fonotática das sílabas de ataque ramificado CCV (Consoante1+Consoante2+Vogal) do Português Brasileiro, analisando suas propriedades e restrições combinatórias. O estudo mensura o julgamento de aceitabilidade de falantes nativos sobre encontros consonantais de frequência alta (/tɾ, pɾ, bɾ/), baixa (/dɾ, kl, gl/) e marginal (/tl, dl, vl/), contrapondo-os a encontros consonantais não atestados na língua, de escala de sonoridade não marcada (sonoridade ascendente /bn, ʃɾ/) e marcada (sonoridade descendente /lb, řt/; plateaus /xl, ft/). Nosso objetivo, com isso, é delinear a intuição fonotática do falante, traçando os efeitos do Léxico (frequência) e da Fonologia (Escala de Sonoridade) na gramática fonotática do PB. Os resultados apontam aceitabilidade distinta entre sequências de alta e baixa frequência, atestando um efeito do Léxico. Entretanto, sequências de frequência igual a zero apresentam julgamentos também distintos por efeito da Escala de Sonoridade, apontando para uma inter-relação Fonotaxe↔Léxico. /tl, dl, vl/, por sua vez, se mostram distintos tanto das sequências atestadas quanto das não atestadas, revelando caráter marginal. A seguinte escala de gradiência fonotática foi constatada: /pɾ, bɾ/≻/tɾ/≻/gl/≻/dɾ/≻/kl/≻/vl, dl/≻/tl/≻/ʃɾ, bn/≻/ft/≻/řt/≻/xl/≻/lb/.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2022-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4263710.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42637Letrônica; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Single volume; e42637Letrônica; v. 15 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e426371984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2022.1reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/42637/27895Copyright (c) 2022 Letrônicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessToni, Andressa2022-12-20T12:39:21Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42637Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2022-12-20T12:39:21letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
‘Bnafe soa melhor que Shrabe?’: Julgamento de aceitabilidade de sequências consonantais frequentes, pouco frequentes, marginais e ausentes no Português Brasileiro
title ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
spellingShingle ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
Toni, Andressa
Fonologia de Laboratório
fonotaxe
sílaba
ataques ramificados
julgamento de aceitabilidade
Laboratory Phonology
phonotactics
syllable
branching onsets
acceptability judgements
title_short ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
title_full ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
title_fullStr ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
title_full_unstemmed ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
title_sort ‘Is Bnafe better than Shrabe?’: Acceptability judgements of frequent, infrequent, marginal and absent consonantal sequences in Brazilian Portuguese
author Toni, Andressa
author_facet Toni, Andressa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Toni, Andressa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fonologia de Laboratório
fonotaxe
sílaba
ataques ramificados
julgamento de aceitabilidade
Laboratory Phonology
phonotactics
syllable
branching onsets
acceptability judgements
topic Fonologia de Laboratório
fonotaxe
sílaba
ataques ramificados
julgamento de aceitabilidade
Laboratory Phonology
phonotactics
syllable
branching onsets
acceptability judgements
description This research explores the phonotactic grammar of CCV (Consonant1+Consonant2+Vowel) branching onsets in Brazilian Portuguese by investigating their combinatorial properties and constraints. The study measures the acceptability judgment of native speakers about high (/tɾ, pɾ, bɾ/), low (/dɾ, kl, gl/) and marginal (/tl, dl, vl/) frequency consonant clusters, comparing them with unattested unmarked clusters (rising sonority, /bn, ʃɾ/) and unattested marked clusters (descending sonority, /lb, řt/; plateaus /xl, ft/). Our aim is to outline the speaker’s phonotactic intuition, analyzing the effects of the Lexicon (frequency) and Phonology (Sound Scale) in the phonotactic grammar of BP. The results show distinct acceptability judgements between high and low frequency sequences, pointing to a Lexicon effect. However, zero frequency sequences also present different acceptability judgments, due to the Sonority Scale effectThese results point to an interrelationship between Phonotactics↔Lexicon. /tl, dl, vl/, in turn, are different from attested and unattested sequences, revealing a marginal character. The following phonotactic gradient scale was found: /pɾ, bɾ/≻/tɾ/≻/gl/≻/dɾ/≻/kl/≻/vl, dl/≻/tl/ ≻/ʃɾ, bn/≻/ft/ ≻/řt/≻/xl/≻/lb/.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/42637
10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42637
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/42637
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42637
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/42637/27895
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Single volume; e42637
Letrônica; v. 15 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e42637
1984-4301
10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128594498191360

Registros relacionados