Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Oficina do Historiador |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36312 |
Resumo: | This paper discusses the possibilities of a ontografic approach to the questioning of things, or what we call “material culture”. An embedded approach in the context of the call Ontological Turn, from the study of otherness that from the things in this case produced by the other, seeks to “translate” into concepts ontology another and compare the raised conceptual differences during the process. A translative comparison between concepts produced by both theoretical agents: the native and the anthropologist. Studies of things in recent years have turned to more literalistic conceptions of even the very definition of “thing”, especially when two or more “worlds” are involved in the equation. In Anthropology, the debate on the Ontological Turn occurs with greater speed and intensity, turning to the core of the discipline itself, shaking some modern foundations that formed the own doing anthropological. It is from this debate, still in progress, that the discipline that uses things as its source, Archaeology, has been seeking to refocus its analysis on the collections resulting from its research. |
id |
PUC_RS-15_640bd5ec6e7951a04c85ba75bb9e65d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36312 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-15 |
network_name_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological TurnConceitos outros: as coisas e a Virada OntológicaMaterial Culture. Archaeology. Ontology.Cultura Material. Arqueologia. Ontologia.This paper discusses the possibilities of a ontografic approach to the questioning of things, or what we call “material culture”. An embedded approach in the context of the call Ontological Turn, from the study of otherness that from the things in this case produced by the other, seeks to “translate” into concepts ontology another and compare the raised conceptual differences during the process. A translative comparison between concepts produced by both theoretical agents: the native and the anthropologist. Studies of things in recent years have turned to more literalistic conceptions of even the very definition of “thing”, especially when two or more “worlds” are involved in the equation. In Anthropology, the debate on the Ontological Turn occurs with greater speed and intensity, turning to the core of the discipline itself, shaking some modern foundations that formed the own doing anthropological. It is from this debate, still in progress, that the discipline that uses things as its source, Archaeology, has been seeking to refocus its analysis on the collections resulting from its research.Este texto pretende discutir as possibilidades de uma abordagem ontográfica sobre a problematização das coisas, ou aquilo que chamamos de “cultura material”. Uma abordagem inserida no contexto da chamada Virada Ontológica, da qual emergem os estudos sobre a alteridade que a partir das coisas, neste caso, produzidas pelo outro, busca “traduzir” em conceitos a ontologia outra e comparar as diferenças conceituais suscitadas durante o processo. Uma comparação translativa entre conceitos produzidos por ambos os agentes teóricos: o nativo e o antropólogo. Os estudos sobre as coisas têm se voltado para concepções mais literalistas acerca, inclusive, da própria definição de “coisa” nos últimos anos, sobretudo quando há o envolvimento de dois ou mais “mundos” na equação. Na Antropologia, o debate sobre a Ontological Turn ocorre com maior velocidade e intensidade, voltando-se para o cerne da própria disciplina, abalando alguns fundamentos modernos que formataram o próprio fazer antropológico. É a partir desse debate, ainda em andamento, que a disciplina que utiliza as coisas como fonte, a Arqueologia, vem buscando reorientar suas análises sobre as coleções resultantes de suas pesquisas.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3631210.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36312Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36312Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36312Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e363122178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.1reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36312/19625Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Antonio Carlos2020-06-14T02:07:14Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36312Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-06-14T02:07:14Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn Conceitos outros: as coisas e a Virada Ontológica |
title |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
spellingShingle |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn Soares, Antonio Carlos Material Culture. Archaeology. Ontology. Cultura Material. Arqueologia. Ontologia. |
title_short |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
title_full |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
title_fullStr |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
title_sort |
Concepts other: things and the Ontological Turn |
author |
Soares, Antonio Carlos |
author_facet |
Soares, Antonio Carlos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Antonio Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Material Culture. Archaeology. Ontology. Cultura Material. Arqueologia. Ontologia. |
topic |
Material Culture. Archaeology. Ontology. Cultura Material. Arqueologia. Ontologia. |
description |
This paper discusses the possibilities of a ontografic approach to the questioning of things, or what we call “material culture”. An embedded approach in the context of the call Ontological Turn, from the study of otherness that from the things in this case produced by the other, seeks to “translate” into concepts ontology another and compare the raised conceptual differences during the process. A translative comparison between concepts produced by both theoretical agents: the native and the anthropologist. Studies of things in recent years have turned to more literalistic conceptions of even the very definition of “thing”, especially when two or more “worlds” are involved in the equation. In Anthropology, the debate on the Ontological Turn occurs with greater speed and intensity, turning to the core of the discipline itself, shaking some modern foundations that formed the own doing anthropological. It is from this debate, still in progress, that the discipline that uses things as its source, Archaeology, has been seeking to refocus its analysis on the collections resulting from its research. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36312 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36312 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36312 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36312 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36312/19625 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36312 Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36312 Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e36312 2178-3748 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1 reponame:Oficina do Historiador instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
collection |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799129361197039616 |