Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/11151 |
Resumo: | Together with Laurent Thévenot, Luc Boltanski proposes that the assessment of social contributions occurs in a context where it is necessary that each participant claims, through justification, for the recognition of her/his place in the economies of worth, where a variety of evaluative criteria will be considered. The conception of this dispute around the justification has a reasonable proximity to the struggle for recognition of achievement (Leistung), that Axel Honneth defines as the third sphere in his theory of recognition; here, beyond the equality in the sphere of law, differences would be justifiably. Part of the discussion is if or how the horizons of values and purposes which enable for the assessment of the individual contribution are shared: in Boltanski they are clearly divergent and for Honneth apparently shared, while Michael Walzer assumes that values are shared, though emphasizing the need for a careful distinction of the spheres of justice to which values are referred to in each case. This distinction of spheres, apparently, can allow a bridge to the cities in the proposition of Boltanski and the spheres of recognition of Axel Honneth’s theory. In the text we propose to explore possible similarities and conceptional differences of these three propositions. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_1890defa39502929e47f36aadb5b4d1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/11151 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and WalzerJustificação, reconhecimento e justiça: Tecendo pontes entre Boltanski, Honneth e Walzertheory of justicerecognitionjustificationcomplex equalityethicsteoria da justiçareconhecimentojustificaçãoigualdade complexaéticaTogether with Laurent Thévenot, Luc Boltanski proposes that the assessment of social contributions occurs in a context where it is necessary that each participant claims, through justification, for the recognition of her/his place in the economies of worth, where a variety of evaluative criteria will be considered. The conception of this dispute around the justification has a reasonable proximity to the struggle for recognition of achievement (Leistung), that Axel Honneth defines as the third sphere in his theory of recognition; here, beyond the equality in the sphere of law, differences would be justifiably. Part of the discussion is if or how the horizons of values and purposes which enable for the assessment of the individual contribution are shared: in Boltanski they are clearly divergent and for Honneth apparently shared, while Michael Walzer assumes that values are shared, though emphasizing the need for a careful distinction of the spheres of justice to which values are referred to in each case. This distinction of spheres, apparently, can allow a bridge to the cities in the proposition of Boltanski and the spheres of recognition of Axel Honneth’s theory. In the text we propose to explore possible similarities and conceptional differences of these three propositions.Luc Boltanski, com Laurent Thévenot, propõe que a avaliação das con- tribuições sociais ocorre num contexto em que é necessário que cada um faça reconhecer o seu respectivo lugar nas economias de grandeza mediante justificação, onde uma diversidade de critérios valorativos será ponderada. Essa disputa em torno da justificação tem razoável proximidade com a luta pelo reconhecimento do desempenho (Leistung), que Axel Honneth coloca como terceira esfera em sua teoria do reconhecimento, na qual para além da igualdade da esfera do direito as diferenças se fariam justificadamente presentes. É passível de discussão como os horizontes de valores e de fins que permitem a avaliação da contribuição são partilhados: em Boltanski claramente divergentes e em Honneth aparentemente compartilhados, enquanto Michael Walzer supõe que os valores são compartilhados, mas enfatiza a necessidade de cuidadosa distinção das esferas de justiça a que em cada caso os valores são referidos. Essa distinção de esferas, aparentemente, pode permitir uma ponte com as cidades na proposição de Boltanski e com as esferas do reconhecimento da teoria de Axel Honneth. No texto nós nos propomos a explorar possíveis semelhanças e diferenças concepcionais dessas três proposições.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2012-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/1115110.15448/1984-7289.2012.1.11151Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2012): Convergences and divergences in the contemporary social theory; 126-144Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2012): Convergências e divergências na teoria social contemporânea; 126-144Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): Convergências e divergências na teoria social contemporânea; 126-1441984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2012.1reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/11151/7635Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobottka, EmilSaavedra, Giovani2016-08-29T20:14:45Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/11151Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:14:45Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer Justificação, reconhecimento e justiça: Tecendo pontes entre Boltanski, Honneth e Walzer |
title |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
spellingShingle |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer Sobottka, Emil theory of justice recognition justification complex equality ethics teoria da justiça reconhecimento justificação igualdade complexa ética |
title_short |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
title_full |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
title_fullStr |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
title_sort |
Justification, recognition and justice: Weaving bridges between Boltanski, Honneth and Walzer |
author |
Sobottka, Emil |
author_facet |
Sobottka, Emil Saavedra, Giovani |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Saavedra, Giovani |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sobottka, Emil Saavedra, Giovani |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
theory of justice recognition justification complex equality ethics teoria da justiça reconhecimento justificação igualdade complexa ética |
topic |
theory of justice recognition justification complex equality ethics teoria da justiça reconhecimento justificação igualdade complexa ética |
description |
Together with Laurent Thévenot, Luc Boltanski proposes that the assessment of social contributions occurs in a context where it is necessary that each participant claims, through justification, for the recognition of her/his place in the economies of worth, where a variety of evaluative criteria will be considered. The conception of this dispute around the justification has a reasonable proximity to the struggle for recognition of achievement (Leistung), that Axel Honneth defines as the third sphere in his theory of recognition; here, beyond the equality in the sphere of law, differences would be justifiably. Part of the discussion is if or how the horizons of values and purposes which enable for the assessment of the individual contribution are shared: in Boltanski they are clearly divergent and for Honneth apparently shared, while Michael Walzer assumes that values are shared, though emphasizing the need for a careful distinction of the spheres of justice to which values are referred to in each case. This distinction of spheres, apparently, can allow a bridge to the cities in the proposition of Boltanski and the spheres of recognition of Axel Honneth’s theory. In the text we propose to explore possible similarities and conceptional differences of these three propositions. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/11151 10.15448/1984-7289.2012.1.11151 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/11151 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2012.1.11151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/11151/7635 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2012): Convergences and divergences in the contemporary social theory; 126-144 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2012): Convergências e divergências na teoria social contemporânea; 126-144 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): Convergências e divergências na teoria social contemporânea; 126-144 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2012.1 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128805589123072 |