Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/28524 |
Resumo: | Many authors view the Constitution of 1988 as the expression of a new participatory project, born with the renewal of collective action in the late 70’s. This article aims at analysing the way actors thought, defended or refuted participatory instruments during the Constituent Assembly, taking into account their rationality. Based on the study of the debates on political rights and health policies, it shows that it is necessary to nuance the thesis that the participative project reflects new actor’s mobilization. The constitutional recognition of participatory instruments is a compromise between opposite political projects. It results from a process during which the representatives of the military regime had a paradoxical paper. |
id |
PUC_RS-20_5ceaddbf1c726732ca5c625241d8c1d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28524 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-20 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationalityLa participación en conflicto en la Asamblea Constituyente: enfrentamientos discursivos e racionalidad de los actoresA participação em conflito na Assembleia Constituinte: confrontos discursivos e racionalidade dos atoresConstituent AssemblyCitizen ParticipationConceptual HistoryBrazil.Asamblea Constituyenteparticipación cuidadanahistoria conceptualBrasil.Assembleia Constituinteparticipação cidadãhistória conceitualBrasil.Many authors view the Constitution of 1988 as the expression of a new participatory project, born with the renewal of collective action in the late 70’s. This article aims at analysing the way actors thought, defended or refuted participatory instruments during the Constituent Assembly, taking into account their rationality. Based on the study of the debates on political rights and health policies, it shows that it is necessary to nuance the thesis that the participative project reflects new actor’s mobilization. The constitutional recognition of participatory instruments is a compromise between opposite political projects. It results from a process during which the representatives of the military regime had a paradoxical paper.La Constitución de 1988 es muchas veces presentada como la expresión de un nuevo proyecto político, procediendo del renacimiento de la acción colectiva al final de los años 1970, que consagra la participación ciudadana. Este artículo analiza como los mecanismos de participación ciudadana fueron pensados, defendidos o refutados durante la Asamblea constituyente, tomando en cuenta la racionalidad de los actores. Basado en el estudio de los debates sobre los derechos políticos e la salud, el artículo muestra que la interpretación segundo la cual el proyecto participativo fue principalmente defendido por “nuevos actores” debe ser matizada. El reconocimiento constitucional de la participación ciudadana es mejor el resultado de un compromiso entre proyectos políticos opuestos, proceso durante el cual los representantes del régimen militar tuvieron un papel paradójico.A Constituição de 1988 é muitas vezes apresentada como a expressão de um projeto político novo, oriundo do renascimento da ação coletiva no final dos anos 1970, que consagra a participação cidadã. Este artigo analisa como os mecanismos de participação dos cidadãos foram pensados, defendidos ou refutados na Assembleia Constituinte, tomando em conta a racionalidade dos atores que defenderam ou se opuseram a esse tema. A partir do estudo dos debates em volta dos direitos políticos e da saúde, o artigo mostra que a interpretação segundo a qual o projeto participativo foi principalmente defendido por “novos atores” deve ser nuançada. O reconhecimento constitucional da participação resulta de um compromisso entre projetos políticos opostos, processo durante o qual os representantes do regime militar tiveram um papel paradoxal.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/2852410.15448/1980-864X.2018.2.28524Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2018): Dossier: Thirty years of the “Citizens' Constitution”: contributions of History and Political Science; 247-260Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2018): Dossier: Treinta años de la “Constitución ciudadana”: contribuciones de la Historia y de la Ciencia Política; 247-260Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 44 n. 2 (2018): Dossiê: Trinta anos da “Constituição cidadã”: contribuições da História e da Ciência Política; 247-2601980-864X0101-406410.15448/1980-864X.2018.2reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanosinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/28524/17110Copyright (c) 2018 Marie-Hélène SA VILAS BOAShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas2018-08-20T19:35:19Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28524Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericanaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br1980-864X0101-4064opendoar:2018-08-20T19:35:19Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality La participación en conflicto en la Asamblea Constituyente: enfrentamientos discursivos e racionalidad de los actores A participação em conflito na Assembleia Constituinte: confrontos discursivos e racionalidade dos atores |
title |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
spellingShingle |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality Boas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas Constituent Assembly Citizen Participation Conceptual History Brazil. Asamblea Constituyente participación cuidadana historia conceptual Brasil. Assembleia Constituinte participação cidadã história conceitual Brasil. |
title_short |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
title_full |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
title_fullStr |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
title_sort |
Citizen participation in conflict during the Constituent Assembly: discursive confrontations and actors’ rationality |
author |
Boas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas |
author_facet |
Boas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Boas, Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Constituent Assembly Citizen Participation Conceptual History Brazil. Asamblea Constituyente participación cuidadana historia conceptual Brasil. Assembleia Constituinte participação cidadã história conceitual Brasil. |
topic |
Constituent Assembly Citizen Participation Conceptual History Brazil. Asamblea Constituyente participación cuidadana historia conceptual Brasil. Assembleia Constituinte participação cidadã história conceitual Brasil. |
description |
Many authors view the Constitution of 1988 as the expression of a new participatory project, born with the renewal of collective action in the late 70’s. This article aims at analysing the way actors thought, defended or refuted participatory instruments during the Constituent Assembly, taking into account their rationality. Based on the study of the debates on political rights and health policies, it shows that it is necessary to nuance the thesis that the participative project reflects new actor’s mobilization. The constitutional recognition of participatory instruments is a compromise between opposite political projects. It results from a process during which the representatives of the military regime had a paradoxical paper. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/28524 10.15448/1980-864X.2018.2.28524 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/28524 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-864X.2018.2.28524 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/28524/17110 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Marie-Hélène SA VILAS BOAS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Marie-Hélène SA VILAS BOAS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2018): Dossier: Thirty years of the “Citizens' Constitution”: contributions of History and Political Science; 247-260 Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2018): Dossier: Treinta años de la “Constitución ciudadana”: contribuciones de la Historia y de la Ciencia Política; 247-260 Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 44 n. 2 (2018): Dossiê: Trinta anos da “Constituição cidadã”: contribuições da História e da Ciência Política; 247-260 1980-864X 0101-4064 10.15448/1980-864X.2018.2 reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanos instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
collection |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128859916894208 |