Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes de
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Couto, Cíntia Fernandes do, Moraes, Camila Martins, Barros, Renata Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265
Resumo: That review assessed the resistance of the fracture at the two laboratorial resins that if they find in the market, the one Artglass® and the other one Targis® as a bevy compared the direct composite resin TPH®. Five bodies as of he samples as of each resin the one being assayed were used. With the matrix of stainless steel assistance along form of a cone segment, along measurements internal as of 8 mm in diameter at the entry level 9 mm at the portion better and 4 mm as of height, have been made the bodies of proving. The samples have been maintained well into water deionizer by 72 hours and submitted to a bulk axial action from a butt as of border rounded in shape as of 2 mm bore, adapted to an appliance as of test across the board EMIC 500. The velocity was 0,05 mm/min, along a cell as of capacitance as of bulk of the 200 kgf. The bulk and the point of fracture have been registered at the machine. The averages have been calculated well into kgf, being the one Artglass® introducing Targis T TPH Tp = 98,26. The data have been submitted at the statistic analysis. Observed in case that than it is to the resin TPH got considerably under age endurance at the compression while Targis and Artiglass did not they presented difference statistics considerably between they self; the contents of inorganic load influences positively into a resistance of compression. UNITERMS: composite resin; laboratorial resin; resistance of compression.
id PUC_RS-22_4383efbb0c821bc4859d2d619567e25b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1265
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromersResistência à compressão entre uma resina composta direta e dois cerômerosThat review assessed the resistance of the fracture at the two laboratorial resins that if they find in the market, the one Artglass® and the other one Targis® as a bevy compared the direct composite resin TPH®. Five bodies as of he samples as of each resin the one being assayed were used. With the matrix of stainless steel assistance along form of a cone segment, along measurements internal as of 8 mm in diameter at the entry level 9 mm at the portion better and 4 mm as of height, have been made the bodies of proving. The samples have been maintained well into water deionizer by 72 hours and submitted to a bulk axial action from a butt as of border rounded in shape as of 2 mm bore, adapted to an appliance as of test across the board EMIC 500. The velocity was 0,05 mm/min, along a cell as of capacitance as of bulk of the 200 kgf. The bulk and the point of fracture have been registered at the machine. The averages have been calculated well into kgf, being the one Artglass® introducing Targis T TPH Tp = 98,26. The data have been submitted at the statistic analysis. Observed in case that than it is to the resin TPH got considerably under age endurance at the compression while Targis and Artiglass did not they presented difference statistics considerably between they self; the contents of inorganic load influences positively into a resistance of compression. UNITERMS: composite resin; laboratorial resin; resistance of compression.Esse estudo avaliou a resistência à fratura de duas resinas laboratoriais que se encontram no mercado, a Artglass® e a Targis® e como grupo comparador, a resina composta direta TPH®. Foram utilizados cinco corpos de prova de cada resina a ser testada. Com o auxílio de matrizes em aço inoxidável com forma de um cone segmentado, com medidas internas de 8,0 mm de diâmetro na base, 9,0 mm na porção superior e 4,0 mm de altura, foram confeccionados os corpos de prova. As amostras foram mantidas em água destilada por 72 horas e submetidas a uma carga axial por ação de uma ponta de extremidade arredondada de 2 mm diâmetro, adaptada a uma máquina de teste universal EMIC 500. A velocidade foi de 0,5 mm/min, com uma célula de capacidade de carga de 200 kgf. A carga e o ponto de fratura foram registrados na máquina. As médias foram calculadas em kgf, sendo o Artglass® apresentando A = 223,46; Targis® T = 204,13; TPH® Tp = 98,26. Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística. Observou-se que a resina TPH obteve significativamente menor resistência à compressão enquanto Targis e Artiglass não apresentaram diferença estaticamente significativamente entre si; o conteúdo de carga inorgânica influencia positivamente na resistência à compressão. UNITERMOS: resina composta; resina laboratorial; resistência à compressão.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2007-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 138 - 142Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 138 - 1421980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265/990Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes deCouto, Cíntia Fernandes doMoraes, Camila MartinsBarros, Renata Nunesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T11:15:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1265Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T11:15:02Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
Resistência à compressão entre uma resina composta direta e dois cerômeros
title Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
spellingShingle Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes de
title_short Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
title_full Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
title_fullStr Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
title_full_unstemmed Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
title_sort Resistence of compression between a direct composite resin and two ceromers
author Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes de
author_facet Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes de
Couto, Cíntia Fernandes do
Moraes, Camila Martins
Barros, Renata Nunes
author_role author
author2 Couto, Cíntia Fernandes do
Moraes, Camila Martins
Barros, Renata Nunes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gouvêa, Cresus Vinícius Depes de
Couto, Cíntia Fernandes do
Moraes, Camila Martins
Barros, Renata Nunes
description That review assessed the resistance of the fracture at the two laboratorial resins that if they find in the market, the one Artglass® and the other one Targis® as a bevy compared the direct composite resin TPH®. Five bodies as of he samples as of each resin the one being assayed were used. With the matrix of stainless steel assistance along form of a cone segment, along measurements internal as of 8 mm in diameter at the entry level 9 mm at the portion better and 4 mm as of height, have been made the bodies of proving. The samples have been maintained well into water deionizer by 72 hours and submitted to a bulk axial action from a butt as of border rounded in shape as of 2 mm bore, adapted to an appliance as of test across the board EMIC 500. The velocity was 0,05 mm/min, along a cell as of capacitance as of bulk of the 200 kgf. The bulk and the point of fracture have been registered at the machine. The averages have been calculated well into kgf, being the one Artglass® introducing Targis T TPH Tp = 98,26. The data have been submitted at the statistic analysis. Observed in case that than it is to the resin TPH got considerably under age endurance at the compression while Targis and Artiglass did not they presented difference statistics considerably between they self; the contents of inorganic load influences positively into a resistance of compression. UNITERMS: composite resin; laboratorial resin; resistance of compression.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1265/990
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 138 - 142
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 138 - 142
1980-6523
0102-9460
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820873734324224