Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/16480 |
Resumo: | AIMS: To evaluate the correlation between leisure and quality of life and to investigate differences between elderly and adults aged between 50 and 59 years. METHODS: The study included subjects of both genders, attendees of a community center for the elderly in a municipality in the state of São Paulo. The instruments Word Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) in its Portuguese version and Leisure Assessment Scale (EAVLA) were used. To verify the correlation between leisure factors and domains of quality of life, as well as differences between the groups with more and less than 60 years old, Pearson correlation and Student t test were used. To analyze the influence of leisure on the quality of life, a model of structural equations was applied. RESULTS: The study included 106 subjects, divided into Group 1 (60-82 years) and Group 2 (50-59 years). Considering correlation between general leisure and quality of life, the Pearson coefficient corresponded to 0.32 in the social relationships domain (moderate positive correlation), to 0.28 in the environmental domain and to 0.20 in the global quality of life (weak positive correlations). By means of the structural equation model, leisure corresponded to 10% of quality of life. There was no difference in quality of life between the two groups. In the socio-cultural leisure activities, the Group 1 had an average of 88.52±15.58, while Group 2 had 96.41±13.37 (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Sociocultural activities scored higher in the group aged up to 59 years. Despite the low or moderate correlation between constructs, this study confirmed that leisure was an important component in the quality of life of people aged between 50 and 82 years and suggests further studies with this population, in order to ascertain more precisely the mutual assistance between these constructs and the handling of variables in intervention processes. |
id |
PUC_RS-25_058921d1c8267cb855b14bdd2a03a19c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16480 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-25 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging processLazer e qualidade de vida: considerações frente ao processo de envelhecimentoAGINGWELLNESS PROGRAMSLEISUREQUALITY OF LIFEENVELHECIMENTOPROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDELAZERQUALIDADE DE VIDA.AIMS: To evaluate the correlation between leisure and quality of life and to investigate differences between elderly and adults aged between 50 and 59 years. METHODS: The study included subjects of both genders, attendees of a community center for the elderly in a municipality in the state of São Paulo. The instruments Word Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) in its Portuguese version and Leisure Assessment Scale (EAVLA) were used. To verify the correlation between leisure factors and domains of quality of life, as well as differences between the groups with more and less than 60 years old, Pearson correlation and Student t test were used. To analyze the influence of leisure on the quality of life, a model of structural equations was applied. RESULTS: The study included 106 subjects, divided into Group 1 (60-82 years) and Group 2 (50-59 years). Considering correlation between general leisure and quality of life, the Pearson coefficient corresponded to 0.32 in the social relationships domain (moderate positive correlation), to 0.28 in the environmental domain and to 0.20 in the global quality of life (weak positive correlations). By means of the structural equation model, leisure corresponded to 10% of quality of life. There was no difference in quality of life between the two groups. In the socio-cultural leisure activities, the Group 1 had an average of 88.52±15.58, while Group 2 had 96.41±13.37 (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Sociocultural activities scored higher in the group aged up to 59 years. Despite the low or moderate correlation between constructs, this study confirmed that leisure was an important component in the quality of life of people aged between 50 and 82 years and suggests further studies with this population, in order to ascertain more precisely the mutual assistance between these constructs and the handling of variables in intervention processes.OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a correlação entre lazer e qualidade de vida e investigar diferenças entre idosos e adultos com idade entre 50 e 59 anos. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos no estudo sujeitos de ambos os gêneros, frequentadores de um centro de convivência para idosos de um município do interior do estado de São Paulo. Foram utilizados os instrumentos Word Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Bref (WHOQOL-Bref), versão em português, e a Escala de Avaliação do Lazer (EAVLA). Para verificar a correlação entre os fatores do lazer e domínios da qualidade de vida e diferenças de média entre grupos de diferentes idades, foram utilizadas correlação de Pearson e teste t de Student. Para analisar a influência do lazer na qualidade de vida foi aplicado um modelo de equações estruturais. RESULTADOS: Participaram 106 sujeitos, divididos em Grupo 1 (60-82 anos) e Grupo 2 (50-59 anos). Na correlação entre lazer em geral e qualidade de vida, o coeficiente de Pearson correspondeu a 0,32 no domínio relações sociais (correlação positiva moderada), 0,28 no do meio ambiente e 0,20 no global (correlações positivas fracas). Por meio do modelo de equações estruturais, o lazer explicou 10% da qualidade de vida. Não houve diferença na qualidade de vida entre os dois grupos. Nas atividades de lazer socioculturais, o Grupo 1 apresentou média de 88,52±15,58, enquanto o Grupo 2 obteve 96,41±13,37 (p=0,009). CONCLUSÕES: As atividades socioculturais obtiveram maior pontuação no grupo com até 59 anos. Em que pese a baixa ou moderada correlação entre os construtos, este estudo confirmou que o lazer foi um componente relevante na qualidade de vida de pessoas com idade entre 50 e 82 anos e sugere aprofundar os estudos com essa população, visando verificar com maior precisão a contribuição mútua entre estes construtos e o manejo de variáveis em processos de intervenção.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2014-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/1648010.15448/1980-6108.2014.3.16480Scientia Medica; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2014); 217-223Scientia Medica; v. 24 n. 3 (2014); 217-2231980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2014.3reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/16480/11620Martinelli, MarceloCarneiro, Adriana MunhozRueda, Fabián Javierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-08-28T14:51:17Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16480Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2017-08-28T14:51:17Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process Lazer e qualidade de vida: considerações frente ao processo de envelhecimento |
title |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
spellingShingle |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process Martinelli, Marcelo AGING WELLNESS PROGRAMS LEISURE QUALITY OF LIFE ENVELHECIMENTO PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE LAZER QUALIDADE DE VIDA. |
title_short |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
title_full |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
title_fullStr |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
title_sort |
Leisure and quality of life: considerations about the aging process |
author |
Martinelli, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Martinelli, Marcelo Carneiro, Adriana Munhoz Rueda, Fabián Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carneiro, Adriana Munhoz Rueda, Fabián Javier |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martinelli, Marcelo Carneiro, Adriana Munhoz Rueda, Fabián Javier |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
AGING WELLNESS PROGRAMS LEISURE QUALITY OF LIFE ENVELHECIMENTO PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE LAZER QUALIDADE DE VIDA. |
topic |
AGING WELLNESS PROGRAMS LEISURE QUALITY OF LIFE ENVELHECIMENTO PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE LAZER QUALIDADE DE VIDA. |
description |
AIMS: To evaluate the correlation between leisure and quality of life and to investigate differences between elderly and adults aged between 50 and 59 years. METHODS: The study included subjects of both genders, attendees of a community center for the elderly in a municipality in the state of São Paulo. The instruments Word Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) in its Portuguese version and Leisure Assessment Scale (EAVLA) were used. To verify the correlation between leisure factors and domains of quality of life, as well as differences between the groups with more and less than 60 years old, Pearson correlation and Student t test were used. To analyze the influence of leisure on the quality of life, a model of structural equations was applied. RESULTS: The study included 106 subjects, divided into Group 1 (60-82 years) and Group 2 (50-59 years). Considering correlation between general leisure and quality of life, the Pearson coefficient corresponded to 0.32 in the social relationships domain (moderate positive correlation), to 0.28 in the environmental domain and to 0.20 in the global quality of life (weak positive correlations). By means of the structural equation model, leisure corresponded to 10% of quality of life. There was no difference in quality of life between the two groups. In the socio-cultural leisure activities, the Group 1 had an average of 88.52±15.58, while Group 2 had 96.41±13.37 (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Sociocultural activities scored higher in the group aged up to 59 years. Despite the low or moderate correlation between constructs, this study confirmed that leisure was an important component in the quality of life of people aged between 50 and 82 years and suggests further studies with this population, in order to ascertain more precisely the mutual assistance between these constructs and the handling of variables in intervention processes. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/16480 10.15448/1980-6108.2014.3.16480 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/16480 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6108.2014.3.16480 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/16480/11620 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2014); 217-223 Scientia Medica; v. 24 n. 3 (2014); 217-223 1980-6108 1806-5562 10.15448/1980-6108.2014.3 reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1809101750211182592 |