Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cony, Karina Vargas
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Goularte, Jéferson Ferraz, de Souza, Carolina Guerini, Sanvitto, Gilberto Luiz, Hagen, Martine E. Kienzle
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/21828
Resumo: Aims: To evaluate the effect of caloric and non-caloric soft drink intake on food consumption, body weight and composition, and metabolic parameters in rats.Methods: Controlled experimental study in which 30 male Wistar rats were divided into three groups and given food and beverage ad libitum during 17 weeks. The groups were as follows, according to the offered food: Control group – standard chow and water; Caloric soft drink group – standard chow, caloric soft drink, and water; and Non-caloric soft drink group – standard chow, non-caloric soft drink, and water.Results: There was no statistical difference in total energy intake, body weight, and fat deposition between groups. However, the chow energy intake was 45% lower in the caloric soft drink group compared to the control and non-caloric soft drink groups (198.7±0.7 kJ vs. 349.4±2.0 and 373.0±1.3 kJ, respectively), with 46% of the energy provided by the soft drink. The caloric soft drink group consumed 22% more carbohydrate, especially sucrose, compared to the control group (p<0.05). Macronutrient intake was not different between the control and non-caloric soft drink groups, but the caloric soft drink group consumed less protein and lipids when compared to the other groups (3.5±1.0 g of protein vs. 6.2±0.1 and 6.7±0.1 g, respectively; 0.7±0.01 g of lipids vs. 1.3±0.02 g and 1.4±0.02 g, respectively). Consumption of non-caloric soft drinks increased total sodium intake and consumption of both soft drinks decreased water intake. Although body weight varied during the experiment, there was no significant difference between groups at the end of the experiment, and no difference in fat deposition, fasting glucose, insulin and leptin, insulin resistance index, and lipid profile.Conclusions: The consumption of both types of soft drinks did not affect energy intake, body weight and composition, or metabolic parameters; however, it increased fluid intake and decreased water ingestion. Caloric soft drink intake influenced the amount and the quality of solid food consumed, compromising diet quality.
id PUC_RS-25_23dadfcb91e1e6ade4c1e71670035767
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/21828
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar ratsSoft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar ratssoft drinksfood consumptionmacronutrients.refrigerantesconsumo alimentarmacronutrientes.Aims: To evaluate the effect of caloric and non-caloric soft drink intake on food consumption, body weight and composition, and metabolic parameters in rats.Methods: Controlled experimental study in which 30 male Wistar rats were divided into three groups and given food and beverage ad libitum during 17 weeks. The groups were as follows, according to the offered food: Control group – standard chow and water; Caloric soft drink group – standard chow, caloric soft drink, and water; and Non-caloric soft drink group – standard chow, non-caloric soft drink, and water.Results: There was no statistical difference in total energy intake, body weight, and fat deposition between groups. However, the chow energy intake was 45% lower in the caloric soft drink group compared to the control and non-caloric soft drink groups (198.7±0.7 kJ vs. 349.4±2.0 and 373.0±1.3 kJ, respectively), with 46% of the energy provided by the soft drink. The caloric soft drink group consumed 22% more carbohydrate, especially sucrose, compared to the control group (p<0.05). Macronutrient intake was not different between the control and non-caloric soft drink groups, but the caloric soft drink group consumed less protein and lipids when compared to the other groups (3.5±1.0 g of protein vs. 6.2±0.1 and 6.7±0.1 g, respectively; 0.7±0.01 g of lipids vs. 1.3±0.02 g and 1.4±0.02 g, respectively). Consumption of non-caloric soft drinks increased total sodium intake and consumption of both soft drinks decreased water intake. Although body weight varied during the experiment, there was no significant difference between groups at the end of the experiment, and no difference in fat deposition, fasting glucose, insulin and leptin, insulin resistance index, and lipid profile.Conclusions: The consumption of both types of soft drinks did not affect energy intake, body weight and composition, or metabolic parameters; however, it increased fluid intake and decreased water ingestion. Caloric soft drink intake influenced the amount and the quality of solid food consumed, compromising diet quality.Consumo de refrigerante reduz a ingestão de alimentos em ratos WistarObjetivos: Avaliar o efeito do consumo de refrigerante calórico e não calórico sobre a ingestão alimentar, composição corporal, massa corporal e parâmetros metabólicos em ratos.Métodos: Estudo experimental com grupo controle. Trinta ratos Wistar machos foram divididos em três grupos e receberam alimentos e bebidas ad libitum. Os grupos foram os seguintes, conforme o alimento oferecido: Grupo controle – ração padrão e água; Grupo refrigerante calórico – ração padrão, refrigerante calórico e água; e Grupo refrigerante não calórico – ração padrão, refrigerante não calórico e água.Resultados: Não houve diferença estatística na ingestão total de energia, peso corporal e depósito adiposo entre os grupos. Entretanto, a ingestão de energia da ração foi 45% menor no Grupo refrigerante calórico comparado ao Grupo controle e ao Grupo refrigerante não calórico (198,7±0,7 kJ vs. 349,4±2,0 kJ e 373,0±1,3 kJ, respectivamente), sendo 46% da energia proveniente do refrigerante. O grupo refrigerante calórico consumiu 22% mais carboidrato, especialmente sacarose, comparado ao Grupo controle (P<0,05). A ingestão de macronutrientes não foi diferente entre o Grupo controle e o Grupo refrigerante não calórico, mas o Grupo refrigerante calórico consumiu menos proteína e lipídios que os outros dois (3,5±1,0 g de proteína vs. 6.2±0,1 e 6,7±0,1 g, respectivamente; 0,7±0,01 g de lipídios vs. 1,3±0,02 g e 1,4±0,02 g, respectivamente). O consumo de refrigerante não calórico aumentou a ingestão total de sódio e o consumo de ambos os refrigerantes diminuiu a ingestão de água. Embora a massa corporal tenha variado durante o experimento, não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos ao final do mesmo e, igualmente, não houve diferença no depósito adiposo, glicose, insulina e leptina em jejum, índice de resistência à insulina e perfil lipídico.Conclusões: A ingestão de ambos os refrigerantes (calórico e não calórico) não afetou a ingestão de energia, composição e massa corporal e parâmetros metabólicos, entretanto aumentou a ingestão de fluidos e diminuiu a de água. A ingestão de refrigerante calórico influenciou a quantidade e qualidade de comida sólida consumida, comprometendo a qualidade da dieta.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2016-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/2182810.15448/1980-6108.2016.2.21828Scientia Medica; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2016); ID21828Scientia Medica; v. 26 n. 2 (2016); ID218281980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2016.2reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/21828/14390Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCony, Karina VargasGoularte, Jéferson Ferrazde Souza, Carolina GueriniSanvitto, Gilberto LuizHagen, Martine E. Kienzle2018-08-09T02:55:55Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/21828Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2018-08-09T02:55:55Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
title Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
spellingShingle Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
Cony, Karina Vargas
soft drinks
food consumption
macronutrients.
refrigerantes
consumo alimentar
macronutrientes.
title_short Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
title_full Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
title_fullStr Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
title_full_unstemmed Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
title_sort Soft drink consumption reduces food intake in Wistar rats
author Cony, Karina Vargas
author_facet Cony, Karina Vargas
Goularte, Jéferson Ferraz
de Souza, Carolina Guerini
Sanvitto, Gilberto Luiz
Hagen, Martine E. Kienzle
author_role author
author2 Goularte, Jéferson Ferraz
de Souza, Carolina Guerini
Sanvitto, Gilberto Luiz
Hagen, Martine E. Kienzle
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cony, Karina Vargas
Goularte, Jéferson Ferraz
de Souza, Carolina Guerini
Sanvitto, Gilberto Luiz
Hagen, Martine E. Kienzle
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv soft drinks
food consumption
macronutrients.
refrigerantes
consumo alimentar
macronutrientes.
topic soft drinks
food consumption
macronutrients.
refrigerantes
consumo alimentar
macronutrientes.
description Aims: To evaluate the effect of caloric and non-caloric soft drink intake on food consumption, body weight and composition, and metabolic parameters in rats.Methods: Controlled experimental study in which 30 male Wistar rats were divided into three groups and given food and beverage ad libitum during 17 weeks. The groups were as follows, according to the offered food: Control group – standard chow and water; Caloric soft drink group – standard chow, caloric soft drink, and water; and Non-caloric soft drink group – standard chow, non-caloric soft drink, and water.Results: There was no statistical difference in total energy intake, body weight, and fat deposition between groups. However, the chow energy intake was 45% lower in the caloric soft drink group compared to the control and non-caloric soft drink groups (198.7±0.7 kJ vs. 349.4±2.0 and 373.0±1.3 kJ, respectively), with 46% of the energy provided by the soft drink. The caloric soft drink group consumed 22% more carbohydrate, especially sucrose, compared to the control group (p<0.05). Macronutrient intake was not different between the control and non-caloric soft drink groups, but the caloric soft drink group consumed less protein and lipids when compared to the other groups (3.5±1.0 g of protein vs. 6.2±0.1 and 6.7±0.1 g, respectively; 0.7±0.01 g of lipids vs. 1.3±0.02 g and 1.4±0.02 g, respectively). Consumption of non-caloric soft drinks increased total sodium intake and consumption of both soft drinks decreased water intake. Although body weight varied during the experiment, there was no significant difference between groups at the end of the experiment, and no difference in fat deposition, fasting glucose, insulin and leptin, insulin resistance index, and lipid profile.Conclusions: The consumption of both types of soft drinks did not affect energy intake, body weight and composition, or metabolic parameters; however, it increased fluid intake and decreased water ingestion. Caloric soft drink intake influenced the amount and the quality of solid food consumed, compromising diet quality.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/21828
10.15448/1980-6108.2016.2.21828
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/21828
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2016.2.21828
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/21828/14390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2016); ID21828
Scientia Medica; v. 26 n. 2 (2016); ID21828
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2016.2
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101750749102080