Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Liszka, James Jakób
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457
Resumo: A close reading of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim shows a correlation between meaning and purpose. If the meaning of a concept, proposition or hypothesis is clarified by formulating its practical effects, those also can be articulated as practical maxims. To the extent that the hypotheses or propositions upon which they are based are true, practical maxims recommend reliable courses of action. This can be translated into a broader claim of an integral relation between semiosis and goal-directed or teleological systems. Any goal-directed systems, to be propagating, must be capable of coordination the information in its internal or endergonic processes with exergonic information found in its environment. Signs are critical links between these two sources of information and must also serve as steering mechanisms for that system as well. If signs detected or represented information in the environments without using that information to steer the system, it would have no practical effect on the system; conversely, if a system could steer itself, but had no representation of exergonic information, it would fail to be propagating. Obviously, to get food, it must not only find it, but must also use that information to direct its behavior in a manner that makes use of that food. Using concepts found in complex systems and modern information theory, it is argued that this analysis requires a distinction between information and meaning. The result of this investigation is the claim that meaning can be understood as the propagating work of information. The remainder of the paper follows some of the ramification of this analysis for Peirce’s semiotic theory.
id PUC_SP-15_03d35a5191e5ed6d0ede67f964d551bb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13457
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of MeaningRepensando a Teoria Pragmática do SignificadoMeaningInformationPragmatismComplex systems.SignificadoInformaçãoPragmatismoSistemas complexos.A close reading of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim shows a correlation between meaning and purpose. If the meaning of a concept, proposition or hypothesis is clarified by formulating its practical effects, those also can be articulated as practical maxims. To the extent that the hypotheses or propositions upon which they are based are true, practical maxims recommend reliable courses of action. This can be translated into a broader claim of an integral relation between semiosis and goal-directed or teleological systems. Any goal-directed systems, to be propagating, must be capable of coordination the information in its internal or endergonic processes with exergonic information found in its environment. Signs are critical links between these two sources of information and must also serve as steering mechanisms for that system as well. If signs detected or represented information in the environments without using that information to steer the system, it would have no practical effect on the system; conversely, if a system could steer itself, but had no representation of exergonic information, it would fail to be propagating. Obviously, to get food, it must not only find it, but must also use that information to direct its behavior in a manner that makes use of that food. Using concepts found in complex systems and modern information theory, it is argued that this analysis requires a distinction between information and meaning. The result of this investigation is the claim that meaning can be understood as the propagating work of information. The remainder of the paper follows some of the ramification of this analysis for Peirce’s semiotic theory.Uma leitura cuidadosa da máxima pragmática de Peirce revela uma correlação entre significado e propósito. Caso o significado de um conceito, proposição ou hipótese seja esclarecido pela formulação dos seus efeitos práticos, eles também podem ser articulados como máximas práticas. À medida que as hipóteses ou proposições sobre as quais são baseados sejam verdadeiras, máximas práticas recomendam linhas de ação confiáveis. Isso pode ser representado como uma afirmação mais abrangente de uma relação integral entre semiose e sistemas orientados a metas ou teleológicos. Para ser propagador, qualquer sistema orientado a meta deve ser capaz de coordenar a informação, em seus processos internos ou endergônicos, com a informação exergônica encontrada em seu ambiente. Sinais são ligações importantes entre estas duas fontes de informação e devem igualmente servir também como mecanismos orientadores para aquele sistema. Se os sinais detectarem ou representarem informações nos ambientes sem usar a informações nos ambientes sem usar a informação para orientar o sistema, não terão efeito prático algum no sistema; inversamente, se um sistema puder orientar a si mesmo e não possuir nenhuma representação de informação exergônica, deixará de ser propagador. Obviamente, para obter alimento não basta apenas encontrá-lo, mas também usar a informação para orientar seu comportamento de forma a fazer uso desse alimento. Por meio dos conceitos encontrados em sistemas complexos e na teoria moderna da informação, argumenta-se que essa análise requer uma distinção entre informação e significado. O resultado desta investigação é a afirmação de que o significado pode ser entendido como o trabalho propagador da informação. O restante deste ensaio segue algumas das ramificações desta análise da teoria semiótica de Peirce.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 60-79Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 60-792316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457/9973Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiszka, James Jakób2024-07-01T13:09:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13457Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:33Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
Repensando a Teoria Pragmática do Significado
title Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
spellingShingle Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
Liszka, James Jakób
Meaning
Information
Pragmatism
Complex systems.
Significado
Informação
Pragmatismo
Sistemas complexos.
title_short Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
title_full Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
title_fullStr Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
title_full_unstemmed Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
title_sort Re-Thinking the Pragmatic Theory of Meaning
author Liszka, James Jakób
author_facet Liszka, James Jakób
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Liszka, James Jakób
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Meaning
Information
Pragmatism
Complex systems.
Significado
Informação
Pragmatismo
Sistemas complexos.
topic Meaning
Information
Pragmatism
Complex systems.
Significado
Informação
Pragmatismo
Sistemas complexos.
description A close reading of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim shows a correlation between meaning and purpose. If the meaning of a concept, proposition or hypothesis is clarified by formulating its practical effects, those also can be articulated as practical maxims. To the extent that the hypotheses or propositions upon which they are based are true, practical maxims recommend reliable courses of action. This can be translated into a broader claim of an integral relation between semiosis and goal-directed or teleological systems. Any goal-directed systems, to be propagating, must be capable of coordination the information in its internal or endergonic processes with exergonic information found in its environment. Signs are critical links between these two sources of information and must also serve as steering mechanisms for that system as well. If signs detected or represented information in the environments without using that information to steer the system, it would have no practical effect on the system; conversely, if a system could steer itself, but had no representation of exergonic information, it would fail to be propagating. Obviously, to get food, it must not only find it, but must also use that information to direct its behavior in a manner that makes use of that food. Using concepts found in complex systems and modern information theory, it is argued that this analysis requires a distinction between information and meaning. The result of this investigation is the claim that meaning can be understood as the propagating work of information. The remainder of the paper follows some of the ramification of this analysis for Peirce’s semiotic theory.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13457/9973
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 60-79
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 60-79
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420882763776