C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stewart, Arthur F.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431
Resumo: This paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power.
id PUC_SP-15_63535597c5b6d387a2f61df6ee1575d0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13431
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religionC.S. Peirce, Deus e Realismo: a intersecção negligenciada entre ciência e religiãoThis paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power.Este artigo apresenta uma integração entre ciência, arte e religião, de acordo com as linhas sugeridas por Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914). Aqui, religião e arte, seguindo Peirce, são consideradas pressupostos das pesquisas científicas. A lógica destas pesquisas, não limitada apenas a investigações de laboratório mas, na verdade, universal em sua aplicação, é também conhecida como Pragmatismo. Este método de Pragmatismo, na forma elaborada por Peirce, constitui a única doutrina filosófica desenvolvida nos Estados Unidos. Durante a discussão desta integração interdisciplinar entre ciência, arte e religião, abordaremos o raciocínio abdutivo, as categorias da realidade e experiência em Peirce, e a distinção entre argumento e argumentação. Figuras históricas importantes, incluindo os artistas Titian e John Constable, os cientistas Alexander Fleming e Johannes Kepler, e os filósofos Sir Karl Popper e o próprio Peirce, serão consideradas. O texto termina dando uma atenção especial ao artigo de Peirce "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especialmente em função de sua lógica pragmática, e de seu poder integrador refinado e sugestivo.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; No. 1 (2000); 153-183Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; n. 1 (2000); 153-1832316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9958https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9959Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStewart, Arthur F.2024-07-01T13:09:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13431Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:33Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
C.S. Peirce, Deus e Realismo: a intersecção negligenciada entre ciência e religião
title C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
spellingShingle C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
Stewart, Arthur F.
title_short C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
title_full C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
title_fullStr C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
title_full_unstemmed C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
title_sort C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
author Stewart, Arthur F.
author_facet Stewart, Arthur F.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stewart, Arthur F.
description This paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9958
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9959
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; No. 1 (2000); 153-183
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; n. 1 (2000); 153-183
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420863889408