C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431 |
Resumo: | This paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_63535597c5b6d387a2f61df6ee1575d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13431 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religionC.S. Peirce, Deus e Realismo: a intersecção negligenciada entre ciência e religiãoThis paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power.Este artigo apresenta uma integração entre ciência, arte e religião, de acordo com as linhas sugeridas por Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914). Aqui, religião e arte, seguindo Peirce, são consideradas pressupostos das pesquisas científicas. A lógica destas pesquisas, não limitada apenas a investigações de laboratório mas, na verdade, universal em sua aplicação, é também conhecida como Pragmatismo. Este método de Pragmatismo, na forma elaborada por Peirce, constitui a única doutrina filosófica desenvolvida nos Estados Unidos. Durante a discussão desta integração interdisciplinar entre ciência, arte e religião, abordaremos o raciocínio abdutivo, as categorias da realidade e experiência em Peirce, e a distinção entre argumento e argumentação. Figuras históricas importantes, incluindo os artistas Titian e John Constable, os cientistas Alexander Fleming e Johannes Kepler, e os filósofos Sir Karl Popper e o próprio Peirce, serão consideradas. O texto termina dando uma atenção especial ao artigo de Peirce "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especialmente em função de sua lógica pragmática, e de seu poder integrador refinado e sugestivo.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; No. 1 (2000); 153-183Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; n. 1 (2000); 153-1832316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9958https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9959Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStewart, Arthur F.2024-07-01T13:09:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13431Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:33Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion C.S. Peirce, Deus e Realismo: a intersecção negligenciada entre ciência e religião |
title |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
spellingShingle |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion Stewart, Arthur F. |
title_short |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
title_full |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
title_fullStr |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
title_full_unstemmed |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
title_sort |
C.S. Peirce, God, and Realism: the neglected crossroads of science and religion |
author |
Stewart, Arthur F. |
author_facet |
Stewart, Arthur F. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stewart, Arthur F. |
description |
This paper presents an integration of science, art, and religion according to lines suggested by Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the scientist, philosopher, and mathematician still considered by many to be America's leading native intellect, to date. Here, religion and art, following Peirce, are taken to be presuppositions of scientific inquiries. The logic of such inquiries, not limited solely to laboratory investigations but in fact universal in application, is also known as Pragmatism. This method of Pragmatism, as elaborated by Peirce, makes for America's only native philosophical doctrine.In the course of discussing this interdisciplinary integration of science, art, and religion, we shall look into the subjects of abductive reasoning, Peirce's categories of reality and experience, the difference between Realism and Nominalism, and the distinction between argument and argumentation. Historically relevant figures including artists Titian and John Constable, scientists Alexander Fleming and Johannes Kepler, and philosophers Sir Karl Popper and Peirce himself, will be considered. The paper ends with close attention being given to Peirce's "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" (The Hibbert Journal: October 1908), especially for its pragmatical logic and its subtle, suggestive, integrational power. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9958 https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13431/9959 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; No. 1 (2000); 153-183 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; n. 1 (2000); 153-183 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420863889408 |