The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ibri, Ivo Assad
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021
Resumo: By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness.
id PUC_SP-15_a4bc39e26cd8e480142de718d0c0aa56
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47021
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretantsA mente semiótica resiliente: relação conflituosa e agápica entre os interpretantes lógicos e emocionaisBeliefsHabitsKinds of interpretantsMindPeirceResilience.CrençasHábitosMentePeirceResiliênciaTipos de interpretantes.By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness.Por mente resiliente, quero dizer a capacidade de toda mente de lidar com a dureza da alteridade, que exige um esforço contínuo para permitir o desenvolvimento de hábitos de conduta. O predicado da resiliência vem da capacidade da mente de se autocorrigir, cada vez que esses hábitos perdem sua eficiência mediativa, exigindo, portanto, a reconstrução de novas mediações cognitivas como hábitos de ação. Neste artigo, proponho refletir sobre o conjunto de interpretantes semióticos proposto por Peirce com o objetivo de explorar sua faceta habitual. Com esta linha de análise, pretendo mostrar que a resiliência é uma propriedade necessária que toda mente deve ter no mais alto grau para lidar com o conflito entre interpretantes emocionais e lógicos, onde a predominância do primeiro em detrimento do segundo pode gerar situações agudas de sofrimento psicológico bloqueando o acesso a representações que, de outra forma, poderiam romper a força bruta da alteridade.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4702110.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2019); 378-391Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2019); 378-3912316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021/31500Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbri, Ivo Assad2020-02-17T00:02:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47021Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2020-02-17T00:02:32Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
A mente semiótica resiliente: relação conflituosa e agápica entre os interpretantes lógicos e emocionais
title The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
spellingShingle The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
Ibri, Ivo Assad
Beliefs
Habits
Kinds of interpretants
Mind
Peirce
Resilience.
Crenças
Hábitos
Mente
Peirce
Resiliência
Tipos de interpretantes.
title_short The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
title_full The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
title_fullStr The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
title_full_unstemmed The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
title_sort The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
author Ibri, Ivo Assad
author_facet Ibri, Ivo Assad
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ibri, Ivo Assad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beliefs
Habits
Kinds of interpretants
Mind
Peirce
Resilience.
Crenças
Hábitos
Mente
Peirce
Resiliência
Tipos de interpretantes.
topic Beliefs
Habits
Kinds of interpretants
Mind
Peirce
Resilience.
Crenças
Hábitos
Mente
Peirce
Resiliência
Tipos de interpretantes.
description By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021
10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021/31500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2019); 378-391
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2019); 378-391
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422188240897

Registros relacionados