The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021 |
Resumo: | By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_a4bc39e26cd8e480142de718d0c0aa56 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47021 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretantsA mente semiótica resiliente: relação conflituosa e agápica entre os interpretantes lógicos e emocionaisBeliefsHabitsKinds of interpretantsMindPeirceResilience.CrençasHábitosMentePeirceResiliênciaTipos de interpretantes.By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness.Por mente resiliente, quero dizer a capacidade de toda mente de lidar com a dureza da alteridade, que exige um esforço contínuo para permitir o desenvolvimento de hábitos de conduta. O predicado da resiliência vem da capacidade da mente de se autocorrigir, cada vez que esses hábitos perdem sua eficiência mediativa, exigindo, portanto, a reconstrução de novas mediações cognitivas como hábitos de ação. Neste artigo, proponho refletir sobre o conjunto de interpretantes semióticos proposto por Peirce com o objetivo de explorar sua faceta habitual. Com esta linha de análise, pretendo mostrar que a resiliência é uma propriedade necessária que toda mente deve ter no mais alto grau para lidar com o conflito entre interpretantes emocionais e lógicos, onde a predominância do primeiro em detrimento do segundo pode gerar situações agudas de sofrimento psicológico bloqueando o acesso a representações que, de outra forma, poderiam romper a força bruta da alteridade.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4702110.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2019); 378-391Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2019); 378-3912316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021/31500Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbri, Ivo Assad2020-02-17T00:02:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47021Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2020-02-17T00:02:32Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants A mente semiótica resiliente: relação conflituosa e agápica entre os interpretantes lógicos e emocionais |
title |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
spellingShingle |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants Ibri, Ivo Assad Beliefs Habits Kinds of interpretants Mind Peirce Resilience. Crenças Hábitos Mente Peirce Resiliência Tipos de interpretantes. |
title_short |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
title_full |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
title_fullStr |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
title_full_unstemmed |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
title_sort |
The semiotic resilient mind: conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants |
author |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_facet |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beliefs Habits Kinds of interpretants Mind Peirce Resilience. Crenças Hábitos Mente Peirce Resiliência Tipos de interpretantes. |
topic |
Beliefs Habits Kinds of interpretants Mind Peirce Resilience. Crenças Hábitos Mente Peirce Resiliência Tipos de interpretantes. |
description |
By resilient mind I mean every mind’s capacity to deal with the hardness of otherness, which demands a continuous effort to allow the development of habits of conduct. The predicate of resilience comes from the mind’s ability to self-correct every time such habits lose their mediative efficiency, therefore requiring the reconstruction of new cognitive mediations as habits of action. In this paper, I propose to reflect on the set of semiotic interpretants proposed by Peirce with the aim of exploring their habitual facet. With this line of analysis, I intend to show that resilience is a necessary property that every mind must have in the highest degree in order to deal with the conflict between emotional and logical interpretants, where the predominance of the former to the detriment of the latter can generate acute situations of psychological suffering by blocking access to representations that otherwise might break the brute force of otherness. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021 10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47021/31500 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2019); 378-391 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2019); 378-391 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422188240897 |