Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47836 |
Resumo: | This inquiry illustrates how Peirce’s Energetic interpretant facilitates consciousness-raising between sign users. Peirce characterizes the Energetic/Existential Interpretant as “exertion,” and “effort” (CP 4.536, MS 318). Because it forces attention and progression of action, the Energetic Interpretant highlights atomistic/punctual cause-effect sign relations by featuring junctures between events: beginning, middle, end. The Firstness and Thirdness underlying it further perpetuates the punctual component (VENDLER, 1967) present in action relations, operational when effort produces resistance against an opposing feeling/force. Effort, however, is but one side of Peirce’s Energetic Interpretant; the opposing (and often more supervenient) side is when external elements (“Perceptuations”) have a more active role (MS 339, 1905) in destroying former beliefs/actions (CP 8.330, 1904). Energetic Interpretants can inhibit (Secondness), i.e., attention to one stimulus, while ignoring another. Nonetheless, consciously inhibiting/resisting a force (via Energetic Interpretants) introduces control beyond the self—another’s reflections upon the conscious acts of an agent (MS 318). This influence between interlocutors satisfies Peirce’s maxim of a “common place to stand” (MS 614), demonstrating mutual comprehension of the sign’s proper effect (CP 5.475). In fact, Energetic Interpretants may result in an effect of such proportion upon either or both interlocutors that a habit-change materializes. As such, Energetic Interpretants epitomize the perfectivity exercised by particular efforts, intimating the likelihood of their discursive success. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_b381d53c11f8c2ef56f8884fd03d674e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47836 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretantPerfectividade no interpretante energético de PeirceAspectEnergetic interpretantExertionPhemePeirceSecondness.AspectoEsforçoFemaInterpretante energéticoPeirceSegundidade.This inquiry illustrates how Peirce’s Energetic interpretant facilitates consciousness-raising between sign users. Peirce characterizes the Energetic/Existential Interpretant as “exertion,” and “effort” (CP 4.536, MS 318). Because it forces attention and progression of action, the Energetic Interpretant highlights atomistic/punctual cause-effect sign relations by featuring junctures between events: beginning, middle, end. The Firstness and Thirdness underlying it further perpetuates the punctual component (VENDLER, 1967) present in action relations, operational when effort produces resistance against an opposing feeling/force. Effort, however, is but one side of Peirce’s Energetic Interpretant; the opposing (and often more supervenient) side is when external elements (“Perceptuations”) have a more active role (MS 339, 1905) in destroying former beliefs/actions (CP 8.330, 1904). Energetic Interpretants can inhibit (Secondness), i.e., attention to one stimulus, while ignoring another. Nonetheless, consciously inhibiting/resisting a force (via Energetic Interpretants) introduces control beyond the self—another’s reflections upon the conscious acts of an agent (MS 318). This influence between interlocutors satisfies Peirce’s maxim of a “common place to stand” (MS 614), demonstrating mutual comprehension of the sign’s proper effect (CP 5.475). In fact, Energetic Interpretants may result in an effect of such proportion upon either or both interlocutors that a habit-change materializes. As such, Energetic Interpretants epitomize the perfectivity exercised by particular efforts, intimating the likelihood of their discursive success.Esta investigação ilustra como o Interpretante energético de Peirce facilita a conscientização entre os usuários de signos. Peirce caracteriza o Interpretante energético/existencial como “empenho” e “esforço” (CP 4.536, MS 318). Por forçar a atenção e a progressão da ação, o Interpretante energético destaca as relações de signos atomísticos/pontuais de causa e efeito apresentando junções entre os eventos: começo, meio e fim. A Primeiridade e a Terceiridade subjacentes perpetuam ainda mais o componente pontual (VENDLER, 1967) presente nas relações de ação, operacional quando o esforço produz resistência contra um sentimento/força oposta. O esforço é, no entanto, apenas um lado do Interpretante energético de Peirce; o lado oposto (e muitas vezes mais superveniente) ocorre quando os elementos externos têm (“Perceptuações”) um papel mais ativo (MS 339, 1905) na destruição de crenças/ações anteriores (CP 8.330, 1904). Os Interpretantes energéticos podem inibir (Segundidade), ou seja, resultar em atenção a um estímulo, enquanto ignoram outro. No entanto, inibir/resistir conscientemente a uma força (por meio de Interpretantes energéticos) introduz o controle além de si mesmo—reflexos do outro sobre os atos conscientes de um agente (MS 318). Essa influência entre interlocutores satisfaz a máxima de Peirce de um “lugar comum para ficar” (MS 614), demonstrando compreensão mútua do efeito próprio do signo (CP 5.475). De fato, os Interpretantes energéticos podem resultar em um efeito de tal proporção sobre um ou ambos os interlocutores que uma mudança de hábito se materialize. Assim, os Interpretantes energéticos condensam a perfectividade exercida por esforços particulares, sugerindo a probabilidade de seu sucesso discursivo.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4783610.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p152-164Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 152-164Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 152-1642316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47836/32418Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWest, Donna E.2020-07-20T22:50:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47836Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2020-07-20T22:50:05Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant Perfectividade no interpretante energético de Peirce |
title |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
spellingShingle |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant West, Donna E. Aspect Energetic interpretant Exertion Pheme Peirce Secondness. Aspecto Esforço Fema Interpretante energético Peirce Segundidade. |
title_short |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
title_full |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
title_fullStr |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
title_sort |
Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant |
author |
West, Donna E. |
author_facet |
West, Donna E. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
West, Donna E. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aspect Energetic interpretant Exertion Pheme Peirce Secondness. Aspecto Esforço Fema Interpretante energético Peirce Segundidade. |
topic |
Aspect Energetic interpretant Exertion Pheme Peirce Secondness. Aspecto Esforço Fema Interpretante energético Peirce Segundidade. |
description |
This inquiry illustrates how Peirce’s Energetic interpretant facilitates consciousness-raising between sign users. Peirce characterizes the Energetic/Existential Interpretant as “exertion,” and “effort” (CP 4.536, MS 318). Because it forces attention and progression of action, the Energetic Interpretant highlights atomistic/punctual cause-effect sign relations by featuring junctures between events: beginning, middle, end. The Firstness and Thirdness underlying it further perpetuates the punctual component (VENDLER, 1967) present in action relations, operational when effort produces resistance against an opposing feeling/force. Effort, however, is but one side of Peirce’s Energetic Interpretant; the opposing (and often more supervenient) side is when external elements (“Perceptuations”) have a more active role (MS 339, 1905) in destroying former beliefs/actions (CP 8.330, 1904). Energetic Interpretants can inhibit (Secondness), i.e., attention to one stimulus, while ignoring another. Nonetheless, consciously inhibiting/resisting a force (via Energetic Interpretants) introduces control beyond the self—another’s reflections upon the conscious acts of an agent (MS 318). This influence between interlocutors satisfies Peirce’s maxim of a “common place to stand” (MS 614), demonstrating mutual comprehension of the sign’s proper effect (CP 5.475). In fact, Energetic Interpretants may result in an effect of such proportion upon either or both interlocutors that a habit-change materializes. As such, Energetic Interpretants epitomize the perfectivity exercised by particular efforts, intimating the likelihood of their discursive success. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47836 10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p152-164 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47836 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p152-164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47836/32418 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 152-164 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 152-164 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422292049920 |