The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525 |
Resumo: | Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_bafa871a2ea7a99c3f3c4ce2dc73ea0c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52525 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early WritingsSobre a genealogia da significação na New List of Categories de PeircePeirceCategoriesPhenomenologySemioticsLogic.Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction.Muitos estudiosos creem que “On a New List of Categories” é uma dedução metafísica ou transcendental. Este ensaio argumentará que Peirce deriva as categorias por indução e valida a ordem delas por prescisão. Depois, o artigo solicitará apoio dos escritos de juventude e maturidade de Peirce para explicar como a nova maneira de listar as categorias pode servir como uma genealogia da significação: como os diferentes tipos de termos, proposições e argumentos emergem no processo de raciocínio como os diferentes tipos de signos. Desse modo, a genealogia da significação se qualificaria, então, tanto como uma fenomenologia da lógica quanto uma ciência da semiótica. Tal ciência da semiótica terá três tipos de comparação correspondendo ao signo-relação em ilação: a saber, uniparance, diaparance e comparance. Depois, os três tipos de comparação ocasionarão três tipos de relativos em diferentes tipos de proposição: a saber, concorrentes, disquiparantes e equiparantes. Por fim, os três tipos de relativos ocasionarão os diferentes tipos de signos correspondendo aos tipos diferentes de termos: a saber, ícones, índices e símbolos. Com esta classificação, há, então, uma explicação de como o processo de raciocínio é um processo semiótico com três formas de argumentos válidos: a saber, hipótese, indução e dedução.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5252510.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e525252316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525/38765Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDillabough, Ronald Joseph2021-12-31T22:19:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52525Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2021-12-31T22:19:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings Sobre a genealogia da significação na New List of Categories de Peirce |
title |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
spellingShingle |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings Dillabough, Ronald Joseph Peirce Categories Phenomenology Semiotics Logic. |
title_short |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
title_full |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
title_fullStr |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
title_sort |
The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings |
author |
Dillabough, Ronald Joseph |
author_facet |
Dillabough, Ronald Joseph |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dillabough, Ronald Joseph |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peirce Categories Phenomenology Semiotics Logic. |
topic |
Peirce Categories Phenomenology Semiotics Logic. |
description |
Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525 10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525/38765 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422339235840 |