The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dillabough, Ronald Joseph
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525
Resumo: Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction.
id PUC_SP-15_bafa871a2ea7a99c3f3c4ce2dc73ea0c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52525
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early WritingsSobre a genealogia da significação na New List of Categories de PeircePeirceCategoriesPhenomenologySemioticsLogic.Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction.Muitos estudiosos creem que “On a New List of Categories” é uma dedução metafísica ou transcendental. Este ensaio argumentará que Peirce deriva as categorias por indução e valida a ordem delas por prescisão. Depois, o artigo solicitará apoio dos escritos de juventude e maturidade de Peirce para explicar como a nova maneira de listar as categorias pode servir como uma genealogia da significação: como os diferentes tipos de termos, proposições e argumentos emergem no processo de raciocínio como os diferentes tipos de signos. Desse modo, a genealogia da significação se qualificaria, então, tanto como uma fenomenologia da lógica quanto uma ciência da semiótica. Tal ciência da semiótica terá três tipos de comparação correspondendo ao signo-relação em ilação: a saber, uniparance, diaparance e comparance. Depois, os três tipos de comparação ocasionarão três tipos de relativos em diferentes tipos de proposição: a saber, concorrentes, disquiparantes e equiparantes. Por fim, os três tipos de relativos ocasionarão os diferentes tipos de signos correspondendo aos tipos diferentes de termos: a saber, ícones, índices e símbolos. Com esta classificação, há, então, uma explicação de como o processo de raciocínio é um processo semiótico com três formas de argumentos válidos: a saber, hipótese, indução e dedução.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5252510.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e525252316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525/38765Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDillabough, Ronald Joseph2021-12-31T22:19:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52525Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2021-12-31T22:19:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
Sobre a genealogia da significação na New List of Categories de Peirce
title The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
spellingShingle The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
Dillabough, Ronald Joseph
Peirce
Categories
Phenomenology
Semiotics
Logic.
title_short The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
title_full The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
title_fullStr The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
title_full_unstemmed The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
title_sort The Function of the Correlate in Peirce's Early Writings
author Dillabough, Ronald Joseph
author_facet Dillabough, Ronald Joseph
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dillabough, Ronald Joseph
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peirce
Categories
Phenomenology
Semiotics
Logic.
topic Peirce
Categories
Phenomenology
Semiotics
Logic.
description Many scholars believe “On a New List of Categories” is a metaphysical or transcendental deduction. The present essay will argue that Peirce derives the categories by induction and validates their order by prescision. Then the article shall solicit aid from Peirce’s early and later writings to explain how the new way to list the categories can serve as a genealogy of signification: how the different types of term, proposition, and argument emerge in the process of reasoning as the different types of signs. Thus, the genealogy of signification would then qualify as a phenomenology of logic as a science of semiotics. Such a science of semiotics will have three types of comparison corresponding to the sign-relation in illation: namely, uniparance, diaparance, and comparance. Then the three types of comparison will occasion three types of relative in different types of propositions: namely, concurrents, disquiparants, and equiparants. Finally, the three types of relative will occasion the different types of sign corresponding to the different types of term: namely, icons, indices, and symbols. With this classification, there is then an explanation of how the process of reasoning is a semiotic process with three forms of valid argument: namely, hypothesis, induction, and deduction.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525
10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e52525
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52525/38765
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e52525
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422339235840