A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590 |
Resumo: | Within the Peircean semiotic tradition, the distinction between process and discrete stage sets up an interesting problem, since, as with any distinction between a continuum and elements which comprise it, a Peircean perspective must confront the issue of how the transformation is made between the seamless procedural flow (semiosis) and the isolated stages (triads) which comprise it.There are four concepts in Peircean semiotics where this issue is especially exposed: two conceptions of the dynamic object, translation, and the percept. This paper consists of two parts: the first reviews these concepts and the questions they present for reconciling triad and continuum; the second part offers a Peircean model that seeks to reconcile the paradoxes. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_ff0eea6eda63531960039f52aac41db6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13590 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Transactional Model of Peircean SemioticUm Modelo Transacional de Semiótica PeircianaContinuumTríadeSignoSemioseObjeto do signoTraduçãoPerceptoContinuumTriadSignSemiosisObject of the signTranslationPerceptWithin the Peircean semiotic tradition, the distinction between process and discrete stage sets up an interesting problem, since, as with any distinction between a continuum and elements which comprise it, a Peircean perspective must confront the issue of how the transformation is made between the seamless procedural flow (semiosis) and the isolated stages (triads) which comprise it.There are four concepts in Peircean semiotics where this issue is especially exposed: two conceptions of the dynamic object, translation, and the percept. This paper consists of two parts: the first reviews these concepts and the questions they present for reconciling triad and continuum; the second part offers a Peircean model that seeks to reconcile the paradoxes.Na tradição semiótica peirciana, a distinção entre processo e estágios discretos põe um problema interessante, já que, como com qualquer distinção entre um continuum e os elementos que o compõem, uma perspectiva peirciana deve confrontar a questão de como é feita a transformação entre o fluxo procedural sem costuras (semiose) e os estágios isolados (tríades) que o perfazem.Há quatro conceitos na semiótica peirciana nos quais essa questão está especialmente exposta: duas concepções do objeto dinâmico, tradução e o percepto. Este artigo tem duas partes: a primeira revisa esses conceitos e as questões apresentam para reconciliar tríade e continuum; a segunda parte apresenta um modelo peirciano que busca reconciliar os paradoxos.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2018-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2006); 133-148Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 7 n. 1 (2006); 133-1482316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590/10099Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSkaggs, Steven2018-06-30T20:48:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13590Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2018-06-30T20:48:01Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic Um Modelo Transacional de Semiótica Peirciana |
title |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
spellingShingle |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic Skaggs, Steven Continuum Tríade Signo Semiose Objeto do signo Tradução Percepto Continuum Triad Sign Semiosis Object of the sign Translation Percept |
title_short |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
title_full |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
title_fullStr |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
title_sort |
A Transactional Model of Peircean Semiotic |
author |
Skaggs, Steven |
author_facet |
Skaggs, Steven |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Skaggs, Steven |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Continuum Tríade Signo Semiose Objeto do signo Tradução Percepto Continuum Triad Sign Semiosis Object of the sign Translation Percept |
topic |
Continuum Tríade Signo Semiose Objeto do signo Tradução Percepto Continuum Triad Sign Semiosis Object of the sign Translation Percept |
description |
Within the Peircean semiotic tradition, the distinction between process and discrete stage sets up an interesting problem, since, as with any distinction between a continuum and elements which comprise it, a Peircean perspective must confront the issue of how the transformation is made between the seamless procedural flow (semiosis) and the isolated stages (triads) which comprise it.There are four concepts in Peircean semiotics where this issue is especially exposed: two conceptions of the dynamic object, translation, and the percept. This paper consists of two parts: the first reviews these concepts and the questions they present for reconciling triad and continuum; the second part offers a Peircean model that seeks to reconcile the paradoxes. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13590/10099 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2006); 133-148 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 7 n. 1 (2006); 133-148 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421265494016 |