Da multa cominatória e da sua execução provisória

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Daniela Rodrigues da
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/29865
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Multa; Obrigação de fazer; Obrigação de não fazer; Medida liminar; Coercibilidade; Exigibilidade; Efetividade; Proporcionalidade; Razoabilidade; Fine; Obligation to do; Obligation not to do; Injunction; Coercivity; Chargeability; Effectiveness; Proportionality; Reasonableness

The present work analyzes the main aspects that involve an injunction fine established by Article 461 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the possibility to execute it provisionally. Therefore, the approach of some concepts and questions is necessary. Initially, an analysis is made, briefly, about action, procedure and jurisdiction. After that, it goes to a brief study of the fundamental safeguards and access to justice. Further, there is an exhibition about the Institute of obligations (to give, do or not do) and early relief. After, if it joins the theme, namely, an injunction fine and its provisional application. In the work presented there is also a reflection on the proceedings for imposition and collection of fines, the quantum, periodicity and cumulative. Are also addressed issues relating to the beneficiary and the time of execution of penalty. During the study there is a demonstration of the current understanding of the Superior Court of Justice with respect to controversial issues addressed related to astreintes. Doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis was performed on all treated aspects