Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7320 |
Resumo: | The bad-faith litigation is without a shadow of a doubt a maleficent behavior that stains the branch of the procedural law, because the part using the proper ways that the law confers to it, litigates in an abusive way bringing damage not only to the adverse part but also to the judiciary structure, which is in the total dependence of the disloyal acts, remaining harm to the whole society and why not to say the credibility of proper justice. The worry of the legislator in restraining the acts of litigation of bad-faith is as older as the proper of Law History. The man worried in finding a way to discipline the human acquaintance, created the law with the goal of providing a harmonious acquaintance to the human beings. However, he immediately felt obliged to create patterns to inhibit that the proper law was a bad-faith instrument of litigation. This fact appears demonstrated in the litigation of bad-faith history, where the concern of foreign legislation is depicted as well as the national doctrine of making difficult disloyal acts that stain the instrumental law. Sometimes, the bad faith litigation is located in a misty position, making it difficult to the interpreter to evidence if it really is a bad-faith litigation act, or if it is out of practice of his rights, such as those assured in our Carta Maior (Big Letter) when it assures us that the law will not exclude the appreciation of the Judiciary injury or threat of right, assuring everybody about the legal defense and the contradictory in the judicial and administrative lawsuit. Therefore, we make an analysis of the moral process and the own contaminated act of bad-faith litigation, adjusting the concepts of law evolution that follows the human being evolution to assure the effectiveness of this study. We analyze the behavior of the parts that appears in the lawsuit, with the objective of searching the major cause of the existence of the disloyal procedure. We portrait the behavior of the bad-faith litigant, trying to clarify all the attitudes that reflects in this undesirable behavior, which must be repelled, preventing the ruin of the patterns that support the State while owner of power-duty of saying the law. The study develops itself giving emphasis to the working lawsuit evidencing the behaviors that reflect the bad-faith litigation and the damages that appear from it. The legislative evolution is also the target of commentaries and it is trying to demonstrate if the laws are really efficient to prevent the performance of bad-faith litigation act. We will analyze the imposed penalties, trying to demonstrate if the existing legislation prevents and it avoids the performance of bad-faith litigant acts. Thus, the study is always carried out, approaching the concern of giving effectiveness to the patterns that forbid such abusive practice in order to preserves the respect to the dignity of the human being and the proper justice |
id |
PUC_SP-1_118ef76b256c40dbee9b707458ba28d3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/7320 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Manus, Pedro Paulo TeixeiraBiscaia, Rosangela Lascosk2016-04-26T20:25:01Z2007-03-222007-02-10Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk. Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado. 2007. 125 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7320The bad-faith litigation is without a shadow of a doubt a maleficent behavior that stains the branch of the procedural law, because the part using the proper ways that the law confers to it, litigates in an abusive way bringing damage not only to the adverse part but also to the judiciary structure, which is in the total dependence of the disloyal acts, remaining harm to the whole society and why not to say the credibility of proper justice. The worry of the legislator in restraining the acts of litigation of bad-faith is as older as the proper of Law History. The man worried in finding a way to discipline the human acquaintance, created the law with the goal of providing a harmonious acquaintance to the human beings. However, he immediately felt obliged to create patterns to inhibit that the proper law was a bad-faith instrument of litigation. This fact appears demonstrated in the litigation of bad-faith history, where the concern of foreign legislation is depicted as well as the national doctrine of making difficult disloyal acts that stain the instrumental law. Sometimes, the bad faith litigation is located in a misty position, making it difficult to the interpreter to evidence if it really is a bad-faith litigation act, or if it is out of practice of his rights, such as those assured in our Carta Maior (Big Letter) when it assures us that the law will not exclude the appreciation of the Judiciary injury or threat of right, assuring everybody about the legal defense and the contradictory in the judicial and administrative lawsuit. Therefore, we make an analysis of the moral process and the own contaminated act of bad-faith litigation, adjusting the concepts of law evolution that follows the human being evolution to assure the effectiveness of this study. We analyze the behavior of the parts that appears in the lawsuit, with the objective of searching the major cause of the existence of the disloyal procedure. We portrait the behavior of the bad-faith litigant, trying to clarify all the attitudes that reflects in this undesirable behavior, which must be repelled, preventing the ruin of the patterns that support the State while owner of power-duty of saying the law. The study develops itself giving emphasis to the working lawsuit evidencing the behaviors that reflect the bad-faith litigation and the damages that appear from it. The legislative evolution is also the target of commentaries and it is trying to demonstrate if the laws are really efficient to prevent the performance of bad-faith litigation act. We will analyze the imposed penalties, trying to demonstrate if the existing legislation prevents and it avoids the performance of bad-faith litigant acts. Thus, the study is always carried out, approaching the concern of giving effectiveness to the patterns that forbid such abusive practice in order to preserves the respect to the dignity of the human being and the proper justiceA litigância de má-fé é, sem sombra de dúvida, um comportamento maléfico que macula o ramo do direito processual, pois, a parte, usando dos próprios meios que a lei lhe confere, litiga de forma abusiva, trazendo prejuízos não só a parte adversa, mas também a toda a estrutura judiciária, a qual fica a mercê dos atos desleais, advindo prejuízo para toda a sociedade e por que não dizer a credibilidade da própria justiça. Tão antiga quanto a própria história do direito é a preocupação do legislador em coibir os atos de litigância de má-fé. O homem preocupado em disciplinar a convivência humana, criou o direito com o objetivo de proporcionar aos seres humanos uma convivência harmoniosa. Entretanto, imediatamente se viu obrigado a criar normas para impedir que o próprio direito fosse instrumento de litigância de má-fé. Tal fato resta demonstrado no histórico da litigância de má-fé, onde se retrata a preocupação da legislação estrangeira bem como a doutrina nacional em dificultar os atos desleais que maculam o direito instrumental, constituindo-se num verdadeiro assédio processual, o que impede por muitas vezes que o direito reconhecido pelo Estado juiz não se torne efetivo. A litigância de má-fé, às vezes, situa-se numa posição nebulosa, dificultando ao interprete evidenciar se realmente se trata de um ato de litigância de má-fé, ou se esta a parte a exercer seus direitos tais qual aqueles assegurados em nossa Carta Maior quando nos assegura que a lei não excluirá da apreciação do Poder Judiciário lesão ou ameaça de direito, assegurando a todos a nos processos judiciais e administrativo a ampla defesa e o contraditório. Para tanto faremos uma analise do processo, da moral e do próprio ato eivado de litigância de má-fé, adequando os conceitos a própria evolução do direito que acompanha a evolução humana, pois se assim não fosse não poderíamos falar em efetividade das normas jurídicas.. Analisamos o comportamento das partes que figuram no processo, com o objetivo de buscar a causa maior da existência do procedimento desleal. Retrataremos o comportamento do litigante de má-fé, procurando esclarecer todas as atitudes que reflete nesse comportamento indesejado o qual deve ser repelido, evitando assim a ruína das normas que amparam o Estado enquanto detentor do poder-dever de dizer o direito. O estudo se desenvolve dando ênfase ao processo trabalhista evidenciando os comportamentos que refletem a litigância de má-fé e os prejuízos que dela decorrem. A evolução legislativa também é alvo de comentários, buscando com isso demonstrar se as leis se mostram de tal eficiente para coibirem a litigância de má-fé. Analisaremos as penalidades impostas, procurando demonstrar se a legislação existente previne e impede a atuação dos litigantes de má-fé. Assim, o estudo é realizado, sempre abordando a preocupação de dar efetividade às normas que proíbem tal prática abusiva a fim de que se preserve o respeito à dignidade do ser humano e da própria justiçaapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/16028/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de DireitoLitigância de má-féProcesso do trabalhoCondenação solidária do advogadoMa-fe (Direito)Justica do trabalhoLitigation of bad-faithProcess of the workSolidary conviction of the lawyerCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOLitigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTRosangela Laskoski Biscaia.pdf.txtRosangela Laskoski Biscaia.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain231390https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/3/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf.txtebfb8e49e2dcb7f8deb9a18dd21a75d7MD53ORIGINALRosangela Laskoski Biscaia.pdfapplication/pdf432230https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/1/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf8c3dd6843bea83a71bfac1a842bb09d2MD51THUMBNAILRosangela Laskoski Biscaia.pdf.jpgRosangela Laskoski Biscaia.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/2/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD52handle/73202022-08-22 18:11:59.547oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/7320Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:59Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
title |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
spellingShingle |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk Litigância de má-fé Processo do trabalho Condenação solidária do advogado Ma-fe (Direito) Justica do trabalho Litigation of bad-faith Process of the work Solidary conviction of the lawyer CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
title_full |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
title_fullStr |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
title_full_unstemmed |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
title_sort |
Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado |
author |
Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk |
author_facet |
Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Manus, Pedro Paulo Teixeira |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk |
contributor_str_mv |
Manus, Pedro Paulo Teixeira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Litigância de má-fé Processo do trabalho Condenação solidária do advogado Ma-fe (Direito) Justica do trabalho |
topic |
Litigância de má-fé Processo do trabalho Condenação solidária do advogado Ma-fe (Direito) Justica do trabalho Litigation of bad-faith Process of the work Solidary conviction of the lawyer CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Litigation of bad-faith Process of the work Solidary conviction of the lawyer |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The bad-faith litigation is without a shadow of a doubt a maleficent behavior that stains the branch of the procedural law, because the part using the proper ways that the law confers to it, litigates in an abusive way bringing damage not only to the adverse part but also to the judiciary structure, which is in the total dependence of the disloyal acts, remaining harm to the whole society and why not to say the credibility of proper justice. The worry of the legislator in restraining the acts of litigation of bad-faith is as older as the proper of Law History. The man worried in finding a way to discipline the human acquaintance, created the law with the goal of providing a harmonious acquaintance to the human beings. However, he immediately felt obliged to create patterns to inhibit that the proper law was a bad-faith instrument of litigation. This fact appears demonstrated in the litigation of bad-faith history, where the concern of foreign legislation is depicted as well as the national doctrine of making difficult disloyal acts that stain the instrumental law. Sometimes, the bad faith litigation is located in a misty position, making it difficult to the interpreter to evidence if it really is a bad-faith litigation act, or if it is out of practice of his rights, such as those assured in our Carta Maior (Big Letter) when it assures us that the law will not exclude the appreciation of the Judiciary injury or threat of right, assuring everybody about the legal defense and the contradictory in the judicial and administrative lawsuit. Therefore, we make an analysis of the moral process and the own contaminated act of bad-faith litigation, adjusting the concepts of law evolution that follows the human being evolution to assure the effectiveness of this study. We analyze the behavior of the parts that appears in the lawsuit, with the objective of searching the major cause of the existence of the disloyal procedure. We portrait the behavior of the bad-faith litigant, trying to clarify all the attitudes that reflects in this undesirable behavior, which must be repelled, preventing the ruin of the patterns that support the State while owner of power-duty of saying the law. The study develops itself giving emphasis to the working lawsuit evidencing the behaviors that reflect the bad-faith litigation and the damages that appear from it. The legislative evolution is also the target of commentaries and it is trying to demonstrate if the laws are really efficient to prevent the performance of bad-faith litigation act. We will analyze the imposed penalties, trying to demonstrate if the existing legislation prevents and it avoids the performance of bad-faith litigant acts. Thus, the study is always carried out, approaching the concern of giving effectiveness to the patterns that forbid such abusive practice in order to preserves the respect to the dignity of the human being and the proper justice |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2007-03-22 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2007-02-10 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-26T20:25:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk. Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado. 2007. 125 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7320 |
identifier_str_mv |
Biscaia, Rosangela Lascosk. Litigância de má-fé no processo do trabalho e a condenação solidária do advogado. 2007. 125 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7320 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/3/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/1/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/7320/2/Rosangela%20Laskoski%20Biscaia.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ebfb8e49e2dcb7f8deb9a18dd21a75d7 8c3dd6843bea83a71bfac1a842bb09d2 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277939764690944 |