Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montes, Lorena de Godoi
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20251
Resumo: The formative assessment is one of the most important pedagogical instruments available and one of the tools used is feedback, which is based on scientific grounds. In view of this, the following hypothesis arose: Does the nursing professor from ETEC Darcy Pereira de Moraes (DPM) adequately use the feedback tool in the evaluation process of the students in the supervised practice internship? If not, what is needed to change this reality? Thus, the objectives outlined for this research were: to analyze the opinions and feelings of the professors from the technical course in nursing at ETEC DPM on the use of feedback in teaching of the nursing practice; to identify the preparation for the use of feedback in teaching the nursing practice from the point of view of teachers; to contextually train the nursing professors on the feedback process; and to evaluate the results of the feedback training, through a specific road map. This is an exploratory-descriptive study, with characteristics of action research, with a qualitative approach. Socio-demographic data were collected and the completion of a focus group of seven nurses from ETEC using the following guiding questions: 1) How do you use feedback in the nursing practice assessment process? 2) Do you feel prepared to give feedback to students? What is missing? 3) In your opinion, what is the advantage/benefit of practical nursing activity feedback? The results were that although the majority show in their personal curricula/resume training to educate, they think that feedback is an important evaluation tool and essential in nursing practice, but they do not have the exact size/understanding of its potential, since they see it primarily as a group activity and synonymous with pointing out mistakes. In addition, the difficulty in providing feedback was a universal discussion among the professors. In response to the results, feedback training was given to the focus group participants, using the Problem Methodology through the Arc Method. It is expected/hoped that their training will be reverted in improving the evaluation process at the institution
id PUC_SP-1_64dfb0ee28cf1b71332107563509926d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20251
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Rodrigues, Cibele Isaac Saadhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4267370E5Montes, Lorena de Godoi2017-07-21T11:38:24Z2017-06-29Montes, Lorena de Godoi. Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?. 2017. 86 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Sorocaba, 2017.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20251The formative assessment is one of the most important pedagogical instruments available and one of the tools used is feedback, which is based on scientific grounds. In view of this, the following hypothesis arose: Does the nursing professor from ETEC Darcy Pereira de Moraes (DPM) adequately use the feedback tool in the evaluation process of the students in the supervised practice internship? If not, what is needed to change this reality? Thus, the objectives outlined for this research were: to analyze the opinions and feelings of the professors from the technical course in nursing at ETEC DPM on the use of feedback in teaching of the nursing practice; to identify the preparation for the use of feedback in teaching the nursing practice from the point of view of teachers; to contextually train the nursing professors on the feedback process; and to evaluate the results of the feedback training, through a specific road map. This is an exploratory-descriptive study, with characteristics of action research, with a qualitative approach. Socio-demographic data were collected and the completion of a focus group of seven nurses from ETEC using the following guiding questions: 1) How do you use feedback in the nursing practice assessment process? 2) Do you feel prepared to give feedback to students? What is missing? 3) In your opinion, what is the advantage/benefit of practical nursing activity feedback? The results were that although the majority show in their personal curricula/resume training to educate, they think that feedback is an important evaluation tool and essential in nursing practice, but they do not have the exact size/understanding of its potential, since they see it primarily as a group activity and synonymous with pointing out mistakes. In addition, the difficulty in providing feedback was a universal discussion among the professors. In response to the results, feedback training was given to the focus group participants, using the Problem Methodology through the Arc Method. It is expected/hoped that their training will be reverted in improving the evaluation process at the institutionA avaliação formativa é um dos mais importantes instrumentos pedagógicos existentes e uma das ferramentas utilizadas é o feedback, o qual é baseado em fundamentação científica. Diante disto, surgiu a seguinte hipótese: O professor enfermeiro da ETEC Darcy Pereira de Moraes (DPM) utiliza adequadamente a ferramenta de feedback no processo de avaliação dos discentes na prática de estágio supervisionado? Em caso negativo, o que é necessário fazer para modificar esta realidade? Assim, os objetivos delineados para esta pesquisa foram: analisar as opiniões e sentimentos dos professores do curso técnico em enfermagem da ETEC DPM no uso do feedback no ensino da prática de enfermagem; identificar o preparo para o uso do feedback no ensino da prática de enfermagem sob a ótica dos professores; capacitar de forma contextualizada os docentes enfermeiros quanto ao processo de feedback; e avaliar os resultados da capacitação em feedback, através de roteiro específico. Trata-se de um estudo exploratório-descritivo, com características de pesquisa-ação, com abordagem qualitativa. Foram coletados dados sociodemográficos e realização da técnica de grupo focal com 07 enfermeiros da ETEC utilizando as seguintes perguntas norteadoras: 1. Como você utiliza o feedback no processo de avaliação da prática de enfermagem? 2.Você se sente preparado para aplicar feedback aos alunos? O que te falta? 3.Na sua opinião, qual a vantagem/benefício de um feedback de atividade prática de enfermagem? Os resultados foram que apesar da maioria exibir em seus currículos pessoais capacitação para educar, opinam que o feedback é uma importante ferramenta de avaliação e essencial na prática da enfermagem, mas não têm a exata dimensão de suas potencialidades, pois enxergam-no primordialmente como atividade em grupo e sinônimo de apontar erros. Além disso, a dificuldade na devolutiva foi um discurso universal entre as professoras. Frente aos resultados, aplicou-se capacitação em feedback aos participantes do grupo focal, utilizando-se a Metodologia da Problematização, através do Método do Arco. Espera-se que a capacitação dos mesmos reverta-se em melhoria dos processos de avaliação na instituiçãoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/42781/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da SaúdePUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de Ciências Médicas e da SaúdeAvaliação educacionalAvaliação em saúdeRetroalimentação (Psicologia)Enfermagem - Estudo e ensinoEducational evaluationHealth evaluationPsychological feedbackNursing - Study and teachingCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDEFeedback: na prática a teoria é outra?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTLorena de Godoi Montes.pdf.txtLorena de Godoi Montes.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain161791https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/4/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf.txtf341f36f87a87f21581e470b634636efMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALLorena de Godoi Montes.pdfLorena de Godoi Montes.pdfapplication/pdf3679786https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/2/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdfc4d7075534f86630ad53467e2bf3f01bMD52THUMBNAILLorena de Godoi Montes.pdf.jpgLorena de Godoi Montes.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2102https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/3/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf.jpge02820398fb4754a45563a9fd7380a11MD53handle/202512022-04-28 08:32:31.753oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-04-28T11:32:31Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
title Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
spellingShingle Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
Montes, Lorena de Godoi
Avaliação educacional
Avaliação em saúde
Retroalimentação (Psicologia)
Enfermagem - Estudo e ensino
Educational evaluation
Health evaluation
Psychological feedback
Nursing - Study and teaching
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
title_short Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
title_full Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
title_fullStr Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
title_full_unstemmed Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
title_sort Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?
author Montes, Lorena de Godoi
author_facet Montes, Lorena de Godoi
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Cibele Isaac Saad
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4267370E5
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montes, Lorena de Godoi
contributor_str_mv Rodrigues, Cibele Isaac Saad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação educacional
Avaliação em saúde
Retroalimentação (Psicologia)
Enfermagem - Estudo e ensino
topic Avaliação educacional
Avaliação em saúde
Retroalimentação (Psicologia)
Enfermagem - Estudo e ensino
Educational evaluation
Health evaluation
Psychological feedback
Nursing - Study and teaching
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Educational evaluation
Health evaluation
Psychological feedback
Nursing - Study and teaching
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
description The formative assessment is one of the most important pedagogical instruments available and one of the tools used is feedback, which is based on scientific grounds. In view of this, the following hypothesis arose: Does the nursing professor from ETEC Darcy Pereira de Moraes (DPM) adequately use the feedback tool in the evaluation process of the students in the supervised practice internship? If not, what is needed to change this reality? Thus, the objectives outlined for this research were: to analyze the opinions and feelings of the professors from the technical course in nursing at ETEC DPM on the use of feedback in teaching of the nursing practice; to identify the preparation for the use of feedback in teaching the nursing practice from the point of view of teachers; to contextually train the nursing professors on the feedback process; and to evaluate the results of the feedback training, through a specific road map. This is an exploratory-descriptive study, with characteristics of action research, with a qualitative approach. Socio-demographic data were collected and the completion of a focus group of seven nurses from ETEC using the following guiding questions: 1) How do you use feedback in the nursing practice assessment process? 2) Do you feel prepared to give feedback to students? What is missing? 3) In your opinion, what is the advantage/benefit of practical nursing activity feedback? The results were that although the majority show in their personal curricula/resume training to educate, they think that feedback is an important evaluation tool and essential in nursing practice, but they do not have the exact size/understanding of its potential, since they see it primarily as a group activity and synonymous with pointing out mistakes. In addition, the difficulty in providing feedback was a universal discussion among the professors. In response to the results, feedback training was given to the focus group participants, using the Problem Methodology through the Arc Method. It is expected/hoped that their training will be reverted in improving the evaluation process at the institution
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-07-21T11:38:24Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-06-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Montes, Lorena de Godoi. Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?. 2017. 86 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Sorocaba, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20251
identifier_str_mv Montes, Lorena de Godoi. Feedback: na prática a teoria é outra?. 2017. 86 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Sorocaba, 2017.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20251
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/4/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/2/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20251/3/Lorena%20de%20Godoi%20Montes.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f341f36f87a87f21581e470b634636ef
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
c4d7075534f86630ad53467e2bf3f01b
e02820398fb4754a45563a9fd7380a11
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277918390517760