Interpretação da competência originária por prerrogativa de função do Supremo Tribunal Federal à luz das inconstitucionalidades presentes na negativa de desmembramento da ação penal nº 470/MG

• Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Gabriela Shizue Soares de
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6233
• topic: Hermenêutica constitucional; Princípios; Direitos fundamentais; Competência originária por prerrogativa de função; Ação Penal 470; Juiz natural; Duplo grau de jurisdição; Constitutional hermeneutics; Principles; Human rights; Original jurisdiction by prerogative function; Criminal Case 470; Natural judge; Double jurisdiction; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

This dissertation seeks to demonstrate the fragility of human rights, when our highest court forgets the principles and guidelines vectors in constitutional interpretation and hermeneutics application of the Constitution, under pressure of public opinion. We seek the best interpretation of the Supreme Court s exceptional original jurisdiction by prerogative function, making a parallel with the peculiar judgment of the Criminal Action Nº 470/MG. We demonstrate that ordinary citizens that do not hold function´s privileges should have preserved their right to natural justice, due process, and especially the double jurisdiction. At the end, we conclude that the double degree of jurisdiction is a fundamental right that can not be denied even to holders of prerogative function and we highlight the unconstitutionality regarding the latent negative of that right in the trial of Criminal Case Nº 470/MG. Wide literature was searched, manifestations of respected masters and doctors, reviews of various segments of society, slowly gathered the personal conviction of the author