Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26796 |
Resumo: | The present work has as its scope the outline of the hypothesis brought by §15 of art. 525, combined with art. 966 of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure (Law No. 13.105 / 2015, “CPC/15”), which set forth the motion to reconsider res judicata, from the standpoint of Professor Miguel Reale's Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. The amendment to CPC/15 led to the inclusion of this hypothesis of motion to reconsider res judicata based on a final decision prior to the declaration of unconstitutionality or incompatibility with the Federal Constitution, by the Federal Supreme Court (“STF”), in control of concentrated or diffuse constitutionality. What this work aims to shed more light are the limits to which the termination decision is subject, in view of the postulate already established before the Supreme Court that the formal law enjoys the presumption of constitutionality until a declaration on contrary. However, the great challenge was to demonstrate the alignment and misalignments of this particular hypothesis of action with the well and widely known jus-philosophical line of thought of Professor Miguel Reale, i.e., the Three-dimensional Theory of Law. This theory establishes that a given legal fact (“Fact”) will be intrinsically related with the legal rule that defines it (“Legal Rule”) and with its values aspects (“Value”). Also, this work aimed to demonstrate the discussion of this hypothesis of Motion to reconsider res judicata in the current case law. Therefore, in view of art. 525, § 15 CPC/15 and the Three-Dimensional Theory of Law, the present work presents the concepts and permeability of one legal rule guard in relation to the other, notably from the perspective of legal certainty, the res judicata, the supremacy of Federal Constitution, and also in view of the case law |
id |
PUC_SP-1_ed2af0871efbf8e745fe11b8cb705204 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/26796 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fagundes, Cristiane Druve TavaresBassoukou, Jean Haralambos2022-08-16T15:37:43Z2022-08-16T15:37:43Z2019-09-27https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26796The present work has as its scope the outline of the hypothesis brought by §15 of art. 525, combined with art. 966 of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure (Law No. 13.105 / 2015, “CPC/15”), which set forth the motion to reconsider res judicata, from the standpoint of Professor Miguel Reale's Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. The amendment to CPC/15 led to the inclusion of this hypothesis of motion to reconsider res judicata based on a final decision prior to the declaration of unconstitutionality or incompatibility with the Federal Constitution, by the Federal Supreme Court (“STF”), in control of concentrated or diffuse constitutionality. What this work aims to shed more light are the limits to which the termination decision is subject, in view of the postulate already established before the Supreme Court that the formal law enjoys the presumption of constitutionality until a declaration on contrary. However, the great challenge was to demonstrate the alignment and misalignments of this particular hypothesis of action with the well and widely known jus-philosophical line of thought of Professor Miguel Reale, i.e., the Three-dimensional Theory of Law. This theory establishes that a given legal fact (“Fact”) will be intrinsically related with the legal rule that defines it (“Legal Rule”) and with its values aspects (“Value”). Also, this work aimed to demonstrate the discussion of this hypothesis of Motion to reconsider res judicata in the current case law. Therefore, in view of art. 525, § 15 CPC/15 and the Three-Dimensional Theory of Law, the present work presents the concepts and permeability of one legal rule guard in relation to the other, notably from the perspective of legal certainty, the res judicata, the supremacy of Federal Constitution, and also in view of the case lawO presente trabalho possui como escopo o delineamento da hipótese trazida pelo §15 do art. 525, combinado com o art. 966, ambos do Código de Processo Civil de 2015 (Lei n° 13.105/2015, “CPC/15”), que versa sobre ação rescisória, sob o enfoque da Teoria Tridimensional do Direito do professor Miguel Reale. A alteração no CPC/15 propiciou o manejo dessa hipótese de ação rescisória a partir de decisão rescindenda anterior a declaração de inconstitucionalidade ou incompatibilidade com a Constituição Federal, pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (“STF”), em controle de constitucionalidade concentrado ou difuso. O que se buscou trazer mais claramente são os limites a que se submete a decisão rescindenda, diante do postulado já sedimentada perante o STF de que a lei formal goza de presunção de constitucionalidade até declaração em sentido contrário. Porém, o grande desafio foi demonstrar os encaixes e entraves desta possibilidade de ação com a conhecida e difundida corrente jus-filosófica do Professor Miguel Reale denominada Teoria Tridimensional do Direito, em que dado fato jurídico (“Fato”) guardará relação íntima com a norma jurídica que a define (“Norma”) e com os seus valores (“Valor”). Ainda, se buscou apresentar o atual entendimento jurisprudencial quanto a esta hipótese de ação rescisória. Portanto, diante do art. 525, § 15 do CPC/15 e da Teoria Tridimensional do Direito, o presente trabalho se desenvolve ao redor dos conceitos e permeabilidade em que uma norma guarda com a outra, notadamente sob o prisma da segurança jurídica, da coisa julgada e da supremacia da CF e sob a luz da JurisprudênciaporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloEspecialização em Direito Processual CivilPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVILAção rescisóriaTeoria tridimensional do direitoJurisprudênciaCPC/15Coisa julgada inconstitucionalSúmula 343/ STFMotion to reconsider res judicataThree-dimensional theory of lawCase law - CPC / 15Dismissed as unconstitutionalPrecedent 343 / STFAção rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do DireitoMotion to reconsider res judicata based on change of understanding of the Supreme Court and the Three-dimensional Theory of Lawinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPORIGINALJean Haralambos Bassoukou.pdfapplication/pdf820942https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/1/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdfb20535b9b97963c2f1f6626c1152dd87MD51TEXTJean Haralambos Bassoukou.pdf.txtJean Haralambos Bassoukou.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain68751https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/2/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdf.txt6af1fca6bfe3c38c9b66496cfb2076a3MD52THUMBNAILJean Haralambos Bassoukou.pdf.jpgJean Haralambos Bassoukou.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1202https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/3/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdf.jpg6b8bc2b0012750d1e3acfc4f75ffd357MD53handle/267962022-08-19 13:59:22.245oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/26796Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-19T16:59:22Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
dc.title.alternative.en_US.fl_str_mv |
Motion to reconsider res judicata based on change of understanding of the Supreme Court and the Three-dimensional Theory of Law |
title |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
spellingShingle |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito Bassoukou, Jean Haralambos CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL Ação rescisória Teoria tridimensional do direito Jurisprudência CPC/15 Coisa julgada inconstitucional Súmula 343/ STF Motion to reconsider res judicata Three-dimensional theory of law Case law - CPC / 15 Dismissed as unconstitutional Precedent 343 / STF |
title_short |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
title_full |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
title_fullStr |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
title_sort |
Ação rescisória fundada em entendimento posterior do STF e a Teoria Tridimensional do Direito |
author |
Bassoukou, Jean Haralambos |
author_facet |
Bassoukou, Jean Haralambos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Fagundes, Cristiane Druve Tavares |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bassoukou, Jean Haralambos |
contributor_str_mv |
Fagundes, Cristiane Druve Tavares |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL |
topic |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL Ação rescisória Teoria tridimensional do direito Jurisprudência CPC/15 Coisa julgada inconstitucional Súmula 343/ STF Motion to reconsider res judicata Three-dimensional theory of law Case law - CPC / 15 Dismissed as unconstitutional Precedent 343 / STF |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ação rescisória Teoria tridimensional do direito Jurisprudência CPC/15 Coisa julgada inconstitucional Súmula 343/ STF |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Motion to reconsider res judicata Three-dimensional theory of law Case law - CPC / 15 Dismissed as unconstitutional Precedent 343 / STF |
description |
The present work has as its scope the outline of the hypothesis brought by §15 of art. 525, combined with art. 966 of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure (Law No. 13.105 / 2015, “CPC/15”), which set forth the motion to reconsider res judicata, from the standpoint of Professor Miguel Reale's Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. The amendment to CPC/15 led to the inclusion of this hypothesis of motion to reconsider res judicata based on a final decision prior to the declaration of unconstitutionality or incompatibility with the Federal Constitution, by the Federal Supreme Court (“STF”), in control of concentrated or diffuse constitutionality. What this work aims to shed more light are the limits to which the termination decision is subject, in view of the postulate already established before the Supreme Court that the formal law enjoys the presumption of constitutionality until a declaration on contrary. However, the great challenge was to demonstrate the alignment and misalignments of this particular hypothesis of action with the well and widely known jus-philosophical line of thought of Professor Miguel Reale, i.e., the Three-dimensional Theory of Law. This theory establishes that a given legal fact (“Fact”) will be intrinsically related with the legal rule that defines it (“Legal Rule”) and with its values aspects (“Value”). Also, this work aimed to demonstrate the discussion of this hypothesis of Motion to reconsider res judicata in the current case law. Therefore, in view of art. 525, § 15 CPC/15 and the Three-Dimensional Theory of Law, the present work presents the concepts and permeability of one legal rule guard in relation to the other, notably from the perspective of legal certainty, the res judicata, the supremacy of Federal Constitution, and also in view of the case law |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-16T15:37:43Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-16T15:37:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26796 |
url |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26796 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Especialização em Direito Processual Civil |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/1/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/2/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/26796/3/Jean%20Haralambos%20Bassoukou.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
b20535b9b97963c2f1f6626c1152dd87 6af1fca6bfe3c38c9b66496cfb2076a3 6b8bc2b0012750d1e3acfc4f75ffd357 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1799796007757676544 |