Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Galáxia (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757 |
Resumo: | This article starts from the premise that a considerable part of the interpretations and criticisms of the agenda-setting theory focus on statements about the most general conclusions in agenda-setting research rather than on its fundamentals, limits and conditions of validity. On the other hand, it defends the legitimacy of some criticisms of the theory, more specifically those related to the design of agenda-setting research, the methods whereby it is investigated, and how the relevance (salience) of its themes is presented. In this regard, the intention is to point out how some of these criticisms have been overcome through the systematization of some possibilities for the expansion of the centripetal and centrifugal dimensions of this paradigm when investigated by means of WWW systems and environments. |
id |
PUC_SP-8_d64247208030b2de24b240b8e34f1406 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16757 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-8 |
network_name_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the WebA expansão da teoria do agenda-setting em sistemas informativos da Webagenda-settingepistemologiametodologiaWebagenda-settingepistemologyjournalismWeb.This article starts from the premise that a considerable part of the interpretations and criticisms of the agenda-setting theory focus on statements about the most general conclusions in agenda-setting research rather than on its fundamentals, limits and conditions of validity. On the other hand, it defends the legitimacy of some criticisms of the theory, more specifically those related to the design of agenda-setting research, the methods whereby it is investigated, and how the relevance (salience) of its themes is presented. In this regard, the intention is to point out how some of these criticisms have been overcome through the systematization of some possibilities for the expansion of the centripetal and centrifugal dimensions of this paradigm when investigated by means of WWW systems and environments.O artigo parte da premissa de que boa parte das interpretações e críticas direcionadas à teoria do agenda-setting se concentram mais nos enunciados referentes às conclusões mais gerais sobre as pesquisas em agenda-setting e menos em seus fundamentos, limites e condições de validade. Por outro lado, defende-se a legitimidade de algumas críticas direcionadas à teoria, e mais especificamente, as relacionadas à concepção da natureza das agendas, aos métodos pelos quais elas são investigadas, bem como ao modo como se operacionalizaa relevância (salience) dos temas e predicados. Pretende-se, nesse sentido, apontar paraa superação de algumas destas críticas, por ocasião da sistematização de possibilidades da expansão do paradigma, em suas dimensões centrípeta e centrífuga, quando investigadas através de sistemas e ambientes da Web.PEPG COS-PUC-SP2014-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757Galaxia; No. 28 (2014)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 28 (2014)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757/15754e Silva, Jan Alyne Barbosainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-15T14:01:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16757Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2024-05-15T14:01:13Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web A expansão da teoria do agenda-setting em sistemas informativos da Web |
title |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
spellingShingle |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web e Silva, Jan Alyne Barbosa agenda-setting epistemologia metodologia Web agenda-setting epistemology journalism Web. |
title_short |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
title_full |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
title_fullStr |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
title_sort |
Expansion of the agenda-setting theory in information systems on the Web |
author |
e Silva, Jan Alyne Barbosa |
author_facet |
e Silva, Jan Alyne Barbosa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
e Silva, Jan Alyne Barbosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
agenda-setting epistemologia metodologia Web agenda-setting epistemology journalism Web. |
topic |
agenda-setting epistemologia metodologia Web agenda-setting epistemology journalism Web. |
description |
This article starts from the premise that a considerable part of the interpretations and criticisms of the agenda-setting theory focus on statements about the most general conclusions in agenda-setting research rather than on its fundamentals, limits and conditions of validity. On the other hand, it defends the legitimacy of some criticisms of the theory, more specifically those related to the design of agenda-setting research, the methods whereby it is investigated, and how the relevance (salience) of its themes is presented. In this regard, the intention is to point out how some of these criticisms have been overcome through the systematization of some possibilities for the expansion of the centripetal and centrifugal dimensions of this paradigm when investigated by means of WWW systems and environments. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/16757/15754 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Galaxia; No. 28 (2014) GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 28 (2014) 1982-2553 reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
collection |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799129330365759488 |