The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/21163 |
Resumo: | Objective: The research seeks to analyze how the characteristics of online reviews have an influence on building patient trust in the physician being reviewed.Method: Two factorial experiments were performed using Yelp website reviews with the number of stars, the number of reviews, the message content, and the number of reviews written by the reviewer being manipulated to represent the variables: valence, volume, warmth, and the competence of the physician, and the experience of the reviewer.Originality/Relevance: With the popularity of social media, an increasing number of patients are looking to online reviews for recommended treatment before they consult a doctor. Online word-of-mouth recommendations are considered a valuable element in building trust, and this variable is recognized as fundamental in the doctor-patient relationship.Results: In the first experiment, the interaction between valence and volume had a significant effect on trust, demonstrating that volume strengthened or weakened the impact of valence on trust, which corresponds to the moderating effect proposed in the hypothesis. In the second experiment, main effects were observed between the variables “warmth”, “competence”, and the “experience of the reviewer” on trust, but there was no significant three-way interaction as proposed, which raised interesting questions and led to possible explanations.Theoretical/methodological contributions: The research provides support for the scientific community by deepening knowledge on the topic of online reviews in the medical context, considering the popularity of this tool and the trend towards the growth of physician review websites.Social/Management Contributions: The research findings can help review sites and users better manage and use such online platforms through the characteristics investigated. |
id |
RBM-1_2b6a22bac7aebfaf59749c16754498de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/21163 |
network_acronym_str |
RBM-1 |
network_name_str |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physicianA influência do boca-a-boca por avaliações online na construção da confiança do paciente no médicoonline word-of-mouth; online reviews; doctor-patient relationship; trustBoca-a-boca online; Avaliações online; Relação médico-paciente; ConfiançaObjective: The research seeks to analyze how the characteristics of online reviews have an influence on building patient trust in the physician being reviewed.Method: Two factorial experiments were performed using Yelp website reviews with the number of stars, the number of reviews, the message content, and the number of reviews written by the reviewer being manipulated to represent the variables: valence, volume, warmth, and the competence of the physician, and the experience of the reviewer.Originality/Relevance: With the popularity of social media, an increasing number of patients are looking to online reviews for recommended treatment before they consult a doctor. Online word-of-mouth recommendations are considered a valuable element in building trust, and this variable is recognized as fundamental in the doctor-patient relationship.Results: In the first experiment, the interaction between valence and volume had a significant effect on trust, demonstrating that volume strengthened or weakened the impact of valence on trust, which corresponds to the moderating effect proposed in the hypothesis. In the second experiment, main effects were observed between the variables “warmth”, “competence”, and the “experience of the reviewer” on trust, but there was no significant three-way interaction as proposed, which raised interesting questions and led to possible explanations.Theoretical/methodological contributions: The research provides support for the scientific community by deepening knowledge on the topic of online reviews in the medical context, considering the popularity of this tool and the trend towards the growth of physician review websites.Social/Management Contributions: The research findings can help review sites and users better manage and use such online platforms through the characteristics investigated.Objetivo: A pesquisa busca analisar como características de avaliações online influenciam na construção da confiança do paciente no médico avaliado.Método: Foram realizados dois experimentos fatoriais utilizando avaliações do site Yelp com manipulação da quantidade de estrelas, quantidade de avaliações, conteúdo da mensagem e a quantidade de avaliações escritas pelo avaliador, representando as variáveis valência, volume, calor e competência do médico e experiência do avaliador.Originalidade/Relevância: Com a popularidade das redes sociais, acompanha-se um número cada vez maior de pacientes que recorrem às avaliações online para buscar recomendação antes de consultar com os médicos. A recomendação, presente no boca-a-boca online, é considerada um elemento valioso na construção da confiança, sendo esta variável reconhecida como fundamental na relação médico-paciente.Resultados: No primeiro experimento, a interação entre a valência e volume apresentou um efeito significativo na confiança, demonstrando que o volume fortalecia ou enfraquecia o impacto da valência na confiança, o que corresponde ao efeito moderador proposto na hipótese. No segundo experimento, observou-se efeitos principais entre as variáveis calor, competência e experiência do avaliador na confiança, entretanto, não foi verificada interação 3-way significativa proposta, o que levantou questões interessantes e possíveis explicações. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: A pesquisa fornece subsídios para a comunidade científica ao aprofundar o conhecimento na temática de avaliações online no contexto médico, considerando a popularidade dessa ferramenta e a tendência em relação ao crescimento de sites de avaliações de médicos.Contribuições sociais / para a gestão: Os achados da pesquisa podem auxiliar os sites de avaliações e usuários a gerenciarem e utilizarem melhor tais plataformas online por meio das características investigadas.Universidade Nove de Julho - UninovePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Informação e Gestão em SaúdeUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto AlegreMachado, Bárbara Foiato HeinTerres, Mellina da SilvaBasso, Kenny2022-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/2116310.5585/remark.v21i4.21163ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 21, n. 4 (2022): (jul./set.); 1026-10742177-5184reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketinginstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:RBMenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/21163/9817Direitos autorais 2022 ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-18T15:04:19Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/21163Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remarkPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/oaiclaudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org2177-51842177-5184opendoar:2022-10-18T15:04:19REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician A influência do boca-a-boca por avaliações online na construção da confiança do paciente no médico |
title |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
spellingShingle |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician Machado, Bárbara Foiato Hein online word-of-mouth; online reviews; doctor-patient relationship; trust Boca-a-boca online; Avaliações online; Relação médico-paciente; Confiança |
title_short |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
title_full |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
title_fullStr |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
title_sort |
The influence of the word-of-mouth of online reviews on building patient trust in the physician |
author |
Machado, Bárbara Foiato Hein |
author_facet |
Machado, Bárbara Foiato Hein Terres, Mellina da Silva Basso, Kenny |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Terres, Mellina da Silva Basso, Kenny |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Informação e Gestão em Saúde Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Bárbara Foiato Hein Terres, Mellina da Silva Basso, Kenny |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
online word-of-mouth; online reviews; doctor-patient relationship; trust Boca-a-boca online; Avaliações online; Relação médico-paciente; Confiança |
topic |
online word-of-mouth; online reviews; doctor-patient relationship; trust Boca-a-boca online; Avaliações online; Relação médico-paciente; Confiança |
description |
Objective: The research seeks to analyze how the characteristics of online reviews have an influence on building patient trust in the physician being reviewed.Method: Two factorial experiments were performed using Yelp website reviews with the number of stars, the number of reviews, the message content, and the number of reviews written by the reviewer being manipulated to represent the variables: valence, volume, warmth, and the competence of the physician, and the experience of the reviewer.Originality/Relevance: With the popularity of social media, an increasing number of patients are looking to online reviews for recommended treatment before they consult a doctor. Online word-of-mouth recommendations are considered a valuable element in building trust, and this variable is recognized as fundamental in the doctor-patient relationship.Results: In the first experiment, the interaction between valence and volume had a significant effect on trust, demonstrating that volume strengthened or weakened the impact of valence on trust, which corresponds to the moderating effect proposed in the hypothesis. In the second experiment, main effects were observed between the variables “warmth”, “competence”, and the “experience of the reviewer” on trust, but there was no significant three-way interaction as proposed, which raised interesting questions and led to possible explanations.Theoretical/methodological contributions: The research provides support for the scientific community by deepening knowledge on the topic of online reviews in the medical context, considering the popularity of this tool and the trend towards the growth of physician review websites.Social/Management Contributions: The research findings can help review sites and users better manage and use such online platforms through the characteristics investigated. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/21163 10.5585/remark.v21i4.21163 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/21163 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/remark.v21i4.21163 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/21163/9817 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 21, n. 4 (2022): (jul./set.); 1026-1074 2177-5184 reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:RBM |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
RBM |
institution |
RBM |
reponame_str |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
collection |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
claudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org |
_version_ |
1799138642506022912 |