A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303 |
Resumo: | Project control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn. |
id |
RCAP_03589f8c17de3961c867ba569a051cd6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3638 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysisproject managementproject controlPMBOKPRINCE2AACEnetwork analysisProject control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn.UMinho Editora2021-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2019); 37-62International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019); 37-622182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638/3670Perrier, NathalieBenbrahim, Salah-EddinePellerin, Robertinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:46Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3638Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:15.280645Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
title |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis Perrier, Nathalie project management project control PMBOK PRINCE2 AACE network analysis |
title_short |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
title_full |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
title_sort |
A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis |
author |
Perrier, Nathalie |
author_facet |
Perrier, Nathalie Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine Pellerin, Robert |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine Pellerin, Robert |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Perrier, Nathalie Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine Pellerin, Robert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
project management project control PMBOK PRINCE2 AACE network analysis |
topic |
project management project control PMBOK PRINCE2 AACE network analysis |
description |
Project control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303 https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638 https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638/3670 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2019); 37-62 International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019); 37-62 2182-7788 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131537567907840 |