A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perrier, Nathalie
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine, Pellerin, Robert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303
Resumo: Project control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn.
id RCAP_03589f8c17de3961c867ba569a051cd6
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3638
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A comparison of project control standards based on network analysisproject managementproject controlPMBOKPRINCE2AACEnetwork analysisProject control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn.UMinho Editora2021-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2019); 37-62International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019); 37-622182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638/3670Perrier, NathalieBenbrahim, Salah-EddinePellerin, Robertinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:46Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3638Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:15.280645Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
title A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
spellingShingle A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
Perrier, Nathalie
project management
project control
PMBOK
PRINCE2
AACE
network analysis
title_short A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
title_full A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
title_sort A comparison of project control standards based on network analysis
author Perrier, Nathalie
author_facet Perrier, Nathalie
Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine
Pellerin, Robert
author_role author
author2 Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine
Pellerin, Robert
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perrier, Nathalie
Benbrahim, Salah-Eddine
Pellerin, Robert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv project management
project control
PMBOK
PRINCE2
AACE
network analysis
topic project management
project control
PMBOK
PRINCE2
AACE
network analysis
description Project control is a crucial function in project management. Over the years, several best practice standards have been developed to assist project managers in improving project control. The objective of this paper is to compare three prominent best practice models of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and the AACE framework with respect to the core processes of project control. Network analysis is used to achieve this objective. The results show that influential and linkage processes, such as Control quality, Review the stage status, Forecasting, and Change management have the most significant impacts on the complexity of the project control function. This work has the potential to help rethink the project control function by creating a more global view of the most central and critical processes for project control, from which enhancement in the ability to control the project can be drawn.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303
url https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3638/3670
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 N.º 3 (2019); 37-62
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019); 37-62
2182-7788
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131537567907840