Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chagas, Laura
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Pedro, Neuza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974
Resumo: This article focuses on student and faculty satisfaction in higher education, in both face-to-face and distance learning systems. This quantitative study, that comprises a descriptive-correlational design, aims to know (1) which elements contribute the most to student satisfaction in both systems and what are the main differences between them, (ii) which factors influence faculty satisfaction and what differences are there between these two methodologies and (iii) in which way does student and faculty satisfaction correlate. The results indicate that students manifest favourable levels of satisfaction in both systems and no significant differences are found between them. In the face-to-face approach, the global satisfaction levels are higher in the ‘technological infrastructures’ as well as in the ‘faculty and tutors’ dimensions, whereas in the distance learning system, the dimensions regarding ‘programme content’ and ‘assistance services’ are the most positive ones. On the other hand, the least favourable satisfaction index in both methods is the one regarding the ‘evaluation system’. The faculty also experienced moderate levels of satisfaction, especially in what concerns the ‘instructor’ subscale. We believe that the Institutions of Higher Education that have implemented distance learning initiatives can benefit from the suggestions that are mentioned in the conclusions of this study. We hope they can contribute to the improvement of this type of course in the Portuguese context.
id RCAP_04944aa12bdca8e40d6041b8fb176512
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/3974
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior PolitécnicoThis article focuses on student and faculty satisfaction in higher education, in both face-to-face and distance learning systems. This quantitative study, that comprises a descriptive-correlational design, aims to know (1) which elements contribute the most to student satisfaction in both systems and what are the main differences between them, (ii) which factors influence faculty satisfaction and what differences are there between these two methodologies and (iii) in which way does student and faculty satisfaction correlate. The results indicate that students manifest favourable levels of satisfaction in both systems and no significant differences are found between them. In the face-to-face approach, the global satisfaction levels are higher in the ‘technological infrastructures’ as well as in the ‘faculty and tutors’ dimensions, whereas in the distance learning system, the dimensions regarding ‘programme content’ and ‘assistance services’ are the most positive ones. On the other hand, the least favourable satisfaction index in both methods is the one regarding the ‘evaluation system’. The faculty also experienced moderate levels of satisfaction, especially in what concerns the ‘instructor’ subscale. We believe that the Institutions of Higher Education that have implemented distance learning initiatives can benefit from the suggestions that are mentioned in the conclusions of this study. We hope they can contribute to the improvement of this type of course in the Portuguese context.Cet article se centre sur la question de la satisfaction des étudiants et des enseignants de l’enseignement supérieur, dans une perspective comparative de l’analyse entre les regimes présentiel e à distance. A travers une étude quantitative, de contenu descriptif corrélationnel nous cherchons à savoir (i) quels sont les éléments qui contribuent le plus à la satisfaction des étudiants dans les deux régimes et quelles sont les différences constatées dans les deux, (ii) quels facteurs contribuent le plus significativement à la satisfaction des enseignants et quels sont les différences signalées entre les deux méthodologies et (iii) quelle est la corrélation de la satisfaction des étudiants et des enseignants. Nos résultats montrent des taux de satisfaction des étudiants favorables dans les deux régimes, il ne se vérifie aucunes différences significatives entre eux. Les dimensions où l’on vérifie les niveaux plus élevés de satisfaction globale en régime présentiel sont celles sur ‘l’infrastructure technologique’ et ‘corps enseignants et tuteurs’ et, en régime à distance, ‘contenu’ et ‘services de soutien’. De son côté, l’indice de satisfaction plus faible a été la dimension ‘système d’évaluation’ dans les deux régimes. Les enseignants expérimentent, aussi, des niveaux modérés de satisfaction, surtout en ce qui concerne la sous-échelle ‘instructeur’. Nous pensons que les diverses Institutions d’enseignement supérieur qui développent l’enseignement à distance peuvent bénéficier des suggestions transmises lors des conclusions de cette étude, qui prétendent contribuer à l’amélioration de l’offerte des cours de ce type dans le contexte portugais.Este artigo incide sobre a temática da satisfação dos estudantes e docentes do ensino superior, numa perspetiva comparativa da análise entre os regimes presencial e a distância. Através de um estudo de matriz quantitativa, de teor descritivo-correlacional, procura-se saber (i) quais os elementos que mais contribuem para a satisfação discente em ambos regimes e quais as diferenças encontradas nos dois, (ii) que fatores mais significativamente concorrem para a satisfação docente e que diferenças se registam entre as duas metodologias e (iii) de que modo se correlaciona a satisfação de estudantes e docentes. Os resultados encontrados evidenciam índices favoráveis de satisfação discente nos dois regimes, não se assinalando diferenças significativas entre os mesmos. As dimensões em que se verificaram índices mais elevados de satisfação global foram, no regime presencial, ‘infraestruturas tecnológicas’ e ‘corpo docente e tutores e, no regime a distância, ‘conteúdos’ e ‘serviços de apoio’. Por sua vez, o índice de satisfação mais reduzido recaiu sobre a dimensão ‘sistema de avaliação’, em ambos os regimes. Os docentes experienciam níveis moderados de satisfação, sobretudo em associação à subescala ‘instrutor’. Crê-se que as diversas Instituições de Ensino Superior que têm implementado iniciativas de Ensino a Distância podem beneficiar das sugestões veiculadas nas conclusões do estudo, as quais se pretende que contribuam para o aperfeiçoamento da oferta de cursos desta modalidade no contexto português.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2014-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974Indagatio Didactica; Vol 6 No 4 (2014); 132-150Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2014); 132-150Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 6 No 4 (2014); 132-150Indagatio Didactica; vol. 6 n.º 4 (2014); 132-1501647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3974https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3974/2972Chagas, LauraPedro, Neuzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:15:42Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/3974Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:03.692158Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
title Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
spellingShingle Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
Chagas, Laura
title_short Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
title_full Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
title_fullStr Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
title_full_unstemmed Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
title_sort Satisfação docente e discente nos regimes presencial e a distância: estudo comparativo no contexto do Ensino Superior Politécnico
author Chagas, Laura
author_facet Chagas, Laura
Pedro, Neuza
author_role author
author2 Pedro, Neuza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chagas, Laura
Pedro, Neuza
description This article focuses on student and faculty satisfaction in higher education, in both face-to-face and distance learning systems. This quantitative study, that comprises a descriptive-correlational design, aims to know (1) which elements contribute the most to student satisfaction in both systems and what are the main differences between them, (ii) which factors influence faculty satisfaction and what differences are there between these two methodologies and (iii) in which way does student and faculty satisfaction correlate. The results indicate that students manifest favourable levels of satisfaction in both systems and no significant differences are found between them. In the face-to-face approach, the global satisfaction levels are higher in the ‘technological infrastructures’ as well as in the ‘faculty and tutors’ dimensions, whereas in the distance learning system, the dimensions regarding ‘programme content’ and ‘assistance services’ are the most positive ones. On the other hand, the least favourable satisfaction index in both methods is the one regarding the ‘evaluation system’. The faculty also experienced moderate levels of satisfaction, especially in what concerns the ‘instructor’ subscale. We believe that the Institutions of Higher Education that have implemented distance learning initiatives can benefit from the suggestions that are mentioned in the conclusions of this study. We hope they can contribute to the improvement of this type of course in the Portuguese context.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v6i4.3974
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3974
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3974/2972
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 6 No 4 (2014); 132-150
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2014); 132-150
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 6 No 4 (2014); 132-150
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 6 n.º 4 (2014); 132-150
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133568493944832