Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524 |
Resumo: | Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources. |
id |
RCAP_05d0dbbecaa0e7543fc7d2606f814cc6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80524 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry3D GeometryDigital technologyPaper and pencilLearningSecondary educationCiências Sociais::Ciências da EducaçãoRecognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.This work was partially funded by CIEd – Centro de Investigação em Educação, Instituto de Educação, Universidade do Minho, projects UIDB/01661/2020 and UIDP/01661/2020, through national funds of FCT/MCTES-PT; and by national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project PTDC/CED-EDG/32422/2017.Commonwealth of Learning (COL)Universidade do MinhoViseu, FlorianoRocha, HelenaMonteiro, José Manuel2022-07-192022-07-19T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524eng2311-155010.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:12:40Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80524Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:04:36.265802Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
title |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
spellingShingle |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry Viseu, Floriano 3D Geometry Digital technology Paper and pencil Learning Secondary education Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação |
title_short |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
title_full |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
title_fullStr |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
title_sort |
Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry |
author |
Viseu, Floriano |
author_facet |
Viseu, Floriano Rocha, Helena Monteiro, José Manuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Helena Monteiro, José Manuel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Viseu, Floriano Rocha, Helena Monteiro, José Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
3D Geometry Digital technology Paper and pencil Learning Secondary education Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação |
topic |
3D Geometry Digital technology Paper and pencil Learning Secondary education Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação |
description |
Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-19 2022-07-19T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2311-1550 10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645 https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/645 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Commonwealth of Learning (COL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Commonwealth of Learning (COL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132456029257728 |