Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viseu, Floriano
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rocha, Helena, Monteiro, José Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524
Resumo: Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.
id RCAP_05d0dbbecaa0e7543fc7d2606f814cc6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80524
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry3D GeometryDigital technologyPaper and pencilLearningSecondary educationCiências Sociais::Ciências da EducaçãoRecognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.This work was partially funded by CIEd – Centro de Investigação em Educação, Instituto de Educação, Universidade do Minho, projects UIDB/01661/2020 and UIDP/01661/2020, through national funds of FCT/MCTES-PT; and by national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project PTDC/CED-EDG/32422/2017.Commonwealth of Learning (COL)Universidade do MinhoViseu, FlorianoRocha, HelenaMonteiro, José Manuel2022-07-192022-07-19T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524eng2311-155010.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:12:40Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80524Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:04:36.265802Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
title Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
spellingShingle Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
Viseu, Floriano
3D Geometry
Digital technology
Paper and pencil
Learning
Secondary education
Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação
title_short Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
title_full Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
title_fullStr Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
title_sort Rethinking digital technology versus paper and pencil in 3D geometry
author Viseu, Floriano
author_facet Viseu, Floriano
Rocha, Helena
Monteiro, José Manuel
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Helena
Monteiro, José Manuel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viseu, Floriano
Rocha, Helena
Monteiro, José Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 3D Geometry
Digital technology
Paper and pencil
Learning
Secondary education
Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação
topic 3D Geometry
Digital technology
Paper and pencil
Learning
Secondary education
Ciências Sociais::Ciências da Educação
description Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-19
2022-07-19T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80524
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2311-1550
10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645
https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Commonwealth of Learning (COL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Commonwealth of Learning (COL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132456029257728