On the instability of economic sociology’s condition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Graça, João Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01
Resumo: The academic and conceptual mappings of economics and sociology, including the identification of a locus for economic sociology, was an important problem for various nineteenth century authors, who formulated theories that received harsh criticism in the 1930s by Parsons, who in his turn later carried on with considerable reformulation of his early group of theses, never settling matters in a completely satisfactory way. These problems were exacerbated, rather than resolved, by late twentieth century authors, namely those associated with “rational choice theory” and “new economic sociology”. The conceptual fluctuations and theoretical incoherence are further aggravated if we include the problem of academic divisions, not just between economics and sociology, but also considering historiography.
id RCAP_07d2f422ca37c52f83a79999222887c0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/23483
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling On the instability of economic sociology’s condition.Acerca da instabilidade da condição da sociologia económicasociologia económicahistóriafronteiras académicasincoerência teóricaeconomic sociologyhistorydisciplinary dividestheoretical incoherence.The academic and conceptual mappings of economics and sociology, including the identification of a locus for economic sociology, was an important problem for various nineteenth century authors, who formulated theories that received harsh criticism in the 1930s by Parsons, who in his turn later carried on with considerable reformulation of his early group of theses, never settling matters in a completely satisfactory way. These problems were exacerbated, rather than resolved, by late twentieth century authors, namely those associated with “rational choice theory” and “new economic sociology”. The conceptual fluctuations and theoretical incoherence are further aggravated if we include the problem of academic divisions, not just between economics and sociology, but also considering historiography..O mapeamento conceptual e académico da sociologia e da ciência económica, incluindo a identificação de um lugar para a sociologia económica, constituiu um problema relevante para vários autores do século XIX, os quais produziram teorizações que foram submetidas a uma severa crítica por Parsons, nos anos 30 do século XX. Parsons reformulou mais tarde várias das suas ideias quanto a estes assuntos, nunca tendo chegado a uma solução satisfatória. Este problema é mais ampliado do que resolvido, considerando autores dos finais do século XX, como os do “individualismo metodológico” e da “nova sociologia económica”. As flutuações conceptuais e a incoerência teórica são ainda mais aprofundadas se tomarmos em consideração também o problema das fronteiras daquelas disciplinas com a história.Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa2012-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01Análise Social; Vol. 47 N.º 202 (2012); 4-272182-29990003-2573reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/23483https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/23483/17473Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Análise Socialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraça, João Carlos2024-02-24T06:11:23Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/23483Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:47.805657Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
.
Acerca da instabilidade da condição da sociologia económica
title On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
spellingShingle On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
Graça, João Carlos
sociologia económica
história
fronteiras académicas
incoerência teórica
economic sociology
history
disciplinary divides
theoretical incoherence
.
title_short On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
title_full On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
title_fullStr On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
title_full_unstemmed On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
title_sort On the instability of economic sociology’s condition
author Graça, João Carlos
author_facet Graça, João Carlos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Graça, João Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sociologia económica
história
fronteiras académicas
incoerência teórica
economic sociology
history
disciplinary divides
theoretical incoherence
.
topic sociologia económica
história
fronteiras académicas
incoerência teórica
economic sociology
history
disciplinary divides
theoretical incoherence
.
description The academic and conceptual mappings of economics and sociology, including the identification of a locus for economic sociology, was an important problem for various nineteenth century authors, who formulated theories that received harsh criticism in the 1930s by Parsons, who in his turn later carried on with considerable reformulation of his early group of theses, never settling matters in a completely satisfactory way. These problems were exacerbated, rather than resolved, by late twentieth century authors, namely those associated with “rational choice theory” and “new economic sociology”. The conceptual fluctuations and theoretical incoherence are further aggravated if we include the problem of academic divisions, not just between economics and sociology, but also considering historiography.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01
https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01
url https://doi.org/10.31447/AS00032573.2012202.01
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/23483
https://revistas.rcaap.pt/analisesocial/article/view/23483/17473
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Análise Social
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Análise Social
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Social; Vol. 47 N.º 202 (2012); 4-27
2182-2999
0003-2573
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133576151695360

Registros relacionados