Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006 |
Resumo: | A new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space. |
id |
RCAP_0a54808f1329ec649ad46783f4060b74 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-184X2015000300006 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative LawGlobal Administrative Lawconcept of lawVerwaltungsvorschriftenInnenrechtwaste managementA new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space.Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.2 n.3 2015reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006Krämer,Rike U.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:40Zoai:scielo:S2183-184X2015000300006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:30.154014Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
title |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
spellingShingle |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law Krämer,Rike U. Global Administrative Law concept of law Verwaltungsvorschriften Innenrecht waste management |
title_short |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
title_full |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
title_fullStr |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
title_sort |
Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law |
author |
Krämer,Rike U. |
author_facet |
Krämer,Rike U. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Krämer,Rike U. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global Administrative Law concept of law Verwaltungsvorschriften Innenrecht waste management |
topic |
Global Administrative Law concept of law Verwaltungsvorschriften Innenrecht waste management |
description |
A new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.2 n.3 2015 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137393574412288 |