Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Suharman, Lucia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: José Carvalho, Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655
Resumo: Through this paper, we intend to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: the content of the video, the content and quantity of the commentary of the video and the analysis of video link and comment. This article seeks to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: video content, content and quantity of comments and the relationship between video content and comment. This analysis is done in three moments: the first time, we analyze about the content of the video, in terms of oral and written scientific accuracy and quality; the second time, we observed a quantity of positive and / or negative commentaries, the commentaries of "like" and "dislike"; Finally, we continue to analyze the relationship of the commentaries of the display / video content. Such an analysis is performed in three stages: at first, the analysis of the video content in terms of written and oral scientific accuracy and its quality; in the second time, the amount of positive and/or negative comments, the comments by "like" and "dislike"; Finally, the analysis of the relationship between the comments with the screening/video content. Videos were analyzed, obtained via YouTube. The methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria, and the analysis of the quantity and quality of commentaries entered by users. Based on the analysis of the video most watched and commented on, showing that there is no scientific support preferences. The videos we analyzed can be found on YouTube. Concerning the methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria and the analysis of the quantity and quality of comments posted by users. In this analysis emerge some results indicating that the most viewed and commented videos do not gain preference for its scientific accuracy.
id RCAP_0bcf8a008264752ae87ba8d548ce0275
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/655
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de PitágorasThrough this paper, we intend to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: the content of the video, the content and quantity of the commentary of the video and the analysis of video link and comment. This article seeks to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: video content, content and quantity of comments and the relationship between video content and comment. This analysis is done in three moments: the first time, we analyze about the content of the video, in terms of oral and written scientific accuracy and quality; the second time, we observed a quantity of positive and / or negative commentaries, the commentaries of "like" and "dislike"; Finally, we continue to analyze the relationship of the commentaries of the display / video content. Such an analysis is performed in three stages: at first, the analysis of the video content in terms of written and oral scientific accuracy and its quality; in the second time, the amount of positive and/or negative comments, the comments by "like" and "dislike"; Finally, the analysis of the relationship between the comments with the screening/video content. Videos were analyzed, obtained via YouTube. The methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria, and the analysis of the quantity and quality of commentaries entered by users. Based on the analysis of the video most watched and commented on, showing that there is no scientific support preferences. The videos we analyzed can be found on YouTube. Concerning the methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria and the analysis of the quantity and quality of comments posted by users. In this analysis emerge some results indicating that the most viewed and commented videos do not gain preference for its scientific accuracy.Com este artigo pretende-se analisar alguns vídeos relacionados com o Teorema de Pitágoras, segundo três perspetivas: conteúdo do vídeo, conteúdo e quantidade dos comentários e análise da relação vídeo e comentário. Tal análise é efetuada em três momentos: no primeiro momento a análise do conteúdo do vídeo em termos de rigor científico oral e escrito e da sua qualidade; no segundo momento a quantidade dos comentários positivos e/ou negativos, dos comentários através do “gosto” e “não gosto”; por último, análise da relação dos comentários com o visionamento/conteúdo do vídeo. Os vídeos analisados encontram-se no YouTube. Relativamente ao procedimento metodológico para a recolha de dados, a análise baseou-se na definição de expressões de pesquisa, critérios de inclusão e pela análise da quantidade e qualidade dos comentários registados pelos utilizadores. Na análise realizada emergem alguns resultados indicadores de que os vídeos mais visionados e comentados, não ganham esta preferência pelo seu rigor científico.Universidade de Aveiro2019-03-06T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655oai:proa.ua.pt:article/655Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol 7 No 2 (2017); 17-38Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2017); 17-38Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol. 7 No 2 (2017); 17-38Internet Latent Corpus Journal; vol. 7 n.º 2 (2017); 17-381647-7308reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ilcj/article/view/655https://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ilcj/article/view/655/553https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSuharman, LuciaJosé Carvalho, Maria2022-09-05T15:21:35Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/655Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:13:43.748915Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
title Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
spellingShingle Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
Suharman, Lucia
title_short Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
title_full Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
title_fullStr Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
title_full_unstemmed Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
title_sort Potencialidades de alguns vídeos do YouTube sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras
author Suharman, Lucia
author_facet Suharman, Lucia
José Carvalho, Maria
author_role author
author2 José Carvalho, Maria
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Suharman, Lucia
José Carvalho, Maria
description Through this paper, we intend to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: the content of the video, the content and quantity of the commentary of the video and the analysis of video link and comment. This article seeks to analyze the videos related to the Pythagorean theorem, according to three perspectives: video content, content and quantity of comments and the relationship between video content and comment. This analysis is done in three moments: the first time, we analyze about the content of the video, in terms of oral and written scientific accuracy and quality; the second time, we observed a quantity of positive and / or negative commentaries, the commentaries of "like" and "dislike"; Finally, we continue to analyze the relationship of the commentaries of the display / video content. Such an analysis is performed in three stages: at first, the analysis of the video content in terms of written and oral scientific accuracy and its quality; in the second time, the amount of positive and/or negative comments, the comments by "like" and "dislike"; Finally, the analysis of the relationship between the comments with the screening/video content. Videos were analyzed, obtained via YouTube. The methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria, and the analysis of the quantity and quality of commentaries entered by users. Based on the analysis of the video most watched and commented on, showing that there is no scientific support preferences. The videos we analyzed can be found on YouTube. Concerning the methodological procedure for data collection, this analysis was based on the definition of search expressions, inclusion criteria and the analysis of the quantity and quality of comments posted by users. In this analysis emerge some results indicating that the most viewed and commented videos do not gain preference for its scientific accuracy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-06T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
journal article
journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/655
url https://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655
identifier_str_mv oai:proa.ua.pt:article/655
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ilcj/article/view/655
https://doi.org/10.34624/ilcj.v7i2.655
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ilcj/article/view/655/553
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol 7 No 2 (2017); 17-38
Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2017); 17-38
Internet Latent Corpus Journal; Vol. 7 No 2 (2017); 17-38
Internet Latent Corpus Journal; vol. 7 n.º 2 (2017); 17-38
1647-7308
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130003855638528