A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Siddique, Lubna
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Hussein, Bassam A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204
Resumo: This paper provides practical insights into the success criteria in agile projects in the Norwegian software industry. We conducted 32 interviews with practitioners working with agile projects. The findings revealed two fundamental differences that distinguish the perception of success in agile projects from that in projects that are based on the waterfall approach. Firstly, the evaluation is carried out on a regular basis after each increment. This regular and continuous measurement of success contributes several advantages, including greater commitment and involvement from the customer and a higher level of mutual trust between the supplier and the customer; and thus leads to better knowledge sharing and reduced task uncertainty. The reduction of task uncertainty provides more predictability about the direction of the project and better grounds for change control; not least, it allows room to consider multiple and subjective assessments by various stakeholders. Secondly, there is a stronger emphasis on customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is measured in terms of how quickly the customer obtains value from the project. The continuous assessment of success at the end of each iteration also has a significant, positive impact on the customer’s evaluation of the project outcome.
id RCAP_0ddabc15f0aee01b0a57b900800a8e34
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3880
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspectivesuccess criteriaagile projectssuppliersqualitative studyThis paper provides practical insights into the success criteria in agile projects in the Norwegian software industry. We conducted 32 interviews with practitioners working with agile projects. The findings revealed two fundamental differences that distinguish the perception of success in agile projects from that in projects that are based on the waterfall approach. Firstly, the evaluation is carried out on a regular basis after each increment. This regular and continuous measurement of success contributes several advantages, including greater commitment and involvement from the customer and a higher level of mutual trust between the supplier and the customer; and thus leads to better knowledge sharing and reduced task uncertainty. The reduction of task uncertainty provides more predictability about the direction of the project and better grounds for change control; not least, it allows room to consider multiple and subjective assessments by various stakeholders. Secondly, there is a stronger emphasis on customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is measured in terms of how quickly the customer obtains value from the project. The continuous assessment of success at the end of each iteration also has a significant, positive impact on the customer’s evaluation of the project outcome.UMinho Editora2022-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 N.º 2 (2016); 63-79International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016); 63-792182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3880https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3880/3938Siddique, LubnaHussein, Bassam A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T11:57:53Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/3880Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:45:19.168759Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
title A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
spellingShingle A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
Siddique, Lubna
success criteria
agile projects
suppliers
qualitative study
title_short A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
title_full A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
title_fullStr A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
title_sort A qualitative study of success criteria in Norwegian agile software projects from suppliers’ perspective
author Siddique, Lubna
author_facet Siddique, Lubna
Hussein, Bassam A.
author_role author
author2 Hussein, Bassam A.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Siddique, Lubna
Hussein, Bassam A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv success criteria
agile projects
suppliers
qualitative study
topic success criteria
agile projects
suppliers
qualitative study
description This paper provides practical insights into the success criteria in agile projects in the Norwegian software industry. We conducted 32 interviews with practitioners working with agile projects. The findings revealed two fundamental differences that distinguish the perception of success in agile projects from that in projects that are based on the waterfall approach. Firstly, the evaluation is carried out on a regular basis after each increment. This regular and continuous measurement of success contributes several advantages, including greater commitment and involvement from the customer and a higher level of mutual trust between the supplier and the customer; and thus leads to better knowledge sharing and reduced task uncertainty. The reduction of task uncertainty provides more predictability about the direction of the project and better grounds for change control; not least, it allows room to consider multiple and subjective assessments by various stakeholders. Secondly, there is a stronger emphasis on customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is measured in terms of how quickly the customer obtains value from the project. The continuous assessment of success at the end of each iteration also has a significant, positive impact on the customer’s evaluation of the project outcome.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204
url https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm040204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3880
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3880/3938
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 N.º 2 (2016); 63-79
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016); 63-79
2182-7788
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131537667522560