Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Cátia da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29894
Resumo: Dendritic cells (DCs) are cells specialized in antigen presentation that play an important role in the connection between innate and adaptive immunity. These cells have the unique ability to recognize, capture, process and present antigens to naïve T cells, leading to their polarization in different effector populations. Because of this ability, DCs have been used in recent decades to develop cancer immunotherapy approaches. In this type of cellular immunotherapy, the production of ex vivo DCs is necessary, and there are several protocols for this purpose. The aim of the present work was to compare two differentiation protocols, Fast (1 day) and Conventional (6 days), while four different maturation cocktails were also tested, where samples from 8 healthy donors were used. For this comparison, the immunophenotypic profile, uptake capacity, cytokine production and metabolic activity were assessed. The results showed that, despite some differences, the cells differentiated by the Fast protocol had a phenotypic profile and uptake capacity very similar to Conventional DCs. Regarding the response to the different maturation conditions, both Fast and Conventional CDs matured more effectively when stimulated with the Alpha cocktail or TLR ligands. At the metabolic level, the main differences between protocols were related to the higher glycolytic and/or glutaminolytic activity of the cells differentiated by the Conventional method. In terms of maturation, the Alpha cocktail appeared to stimulate glutaminolysis, while maturation with the Standard cocktail appeared to favor glycolysis.
id RCAP_0e97bc2e3f0f003ce25e1140010f5dfe
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29894
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocolsMonocyte derived dendritic cellsEx vivo differentiation protocolFast vs. conventionalMaturation cocktailsMetabolism and metabolomicsDendritic cells (DCs) are cells specialized in antigen presentation that play an important role in the connection between innate and adaptive immunity. These cells have the unique ability to recognize, capture, process and present antigens to naïve T cells, leading to their polarization in different effector populations. Because of this ability, DCs have been used in recent decades to develop cancer immunotherapy approaches. In this type of cellular immunotherapy, the production of ex vivo DCs is necessary, and there are several protocols for this purpose. The aim of the present work was to compare two differentiation protocols, Fast (1 day) and Conventional (6 days), while four different maturation cocktails were also tested, where samples from 8 healthy donors were used. For this comparison, the immunophenotypic profile, uptake capacity, cytokine production and metabolic activity were assessed. The results showed that, despite some differences, the cells differentiated by the Fast protocol had a phenotypic profile and uptake capacity very similar to Conventional DCs. Regarding the response to the different maturation conditions, both Fast and Conventional CDs matured more effectively when stimulated with the Alpha cocktail or TLR ligands. At the metabolic level, the main differences between protocols were related to the higher glycolytic and/or glutaminolytic activity of the cells differentiated by the Conventional method. In terms of maturation, the Alpha cocktail appeared to stimulate glutaminolysis, while maturation with the Standard cocktail appeared to favor glycolysis.As células dendríticas (CDs) são células especializadas na apresentação antigénica que desempenham um importante papel na ligação entre a imunidade inata e a imunidade adaptativa. Estas células têm a capacidade única de reconhecer, capturar, processar e apresentar antigénios a células T naïve, levando à polarização destas nas suas diferentes populações efetoras. Devido a esta capacidade, as CDs têm sido usadas nas últimas décadas no desenvolvimento de abordagens de imunoterapia contra o cancro. Neste tipo de imunoterapia celular é necessária a produção das CDs ex vivo, existindo para tal vários protocolos. O objetivo do presente trabalho prendeu-se com a comparação de dois protocolos de diferenciação, Rápido (1 dia) e Convencional (6 dias), sendo também testados quatro cocktails de maturação diferentes, tendo sido utilizadas amostras de 8 dadores saudáveis. Para esta comparação, foram analisados o perfil imunofenotípico, a capacidade de uptake, a produção de citocinas e a atividade metabólica. Os resultados obtidos demonstraram que apesar de algumas diferenças, as células diferenciadas pelo protocolo Rápido apresentaram um perfil fenotípico e capacidade de uptake bastante semelhante às CDs Convencionais. Relativamente à resposta às diferentes condições de maturação, tanto as CDs Rápidas como as Convencionais maturaram de forma mais efetiva quando estimuladas com o cocktail Alpha ou ligandos de TLR. A nível metabólico, as principais diferenças entre os protocolos prenderam-se com a maior atividade glicolítica e/ou glutaminolítica das células diferenciadas pelo método Convencional. Em termos de maturação, o cocktail Alpha pareceu estimular a glutaminólise, enquanto que a maturação com o cocktail Standard pareceu favorecer a glicólise.2021-12-21T00:00:00Z2019-12-20T00:00:00Z2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/29894engMendes, Cátia da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:57:51Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29894Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:02:09.405797Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
title Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
spellingShingle Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
Mendes, Cátia da Silva
Monocyte derived dendritic cells
Ex vivo differentiation protocol
Fast vs. conventional
Maturation cocktails
Metabolism and metabolomics
title_short Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
title_full Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
title_fullStr Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
title_sort Analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells obtained through conventional vs. fast differentiation/maturation protocols
author Mendes, Cátia da Silva
author_facet Mendes, Cátia da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Cátia da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Monocyte derived dendritic cells
Ex vivo differentiation protocol
Fast vs. conventional
Maturation cocktails
Metabolism and metabolomics
topic Monocyte derived dendritic cells
Ex vivo differentiation protocol
Fast vs. conventional
Maturation cocktails
Metabolism and metabolomics
description Dendritic cells (DCs) are cells specialized in antigen presentation that play an important role in the connection between innate and adaptive immunity. These cells have the unique ability to recognize, capture, process and present antigens to naïve T cells, leading to their polarization in different effector populations. Because of this ability, DCs have been used in recent decades to develop cancer immunotherapy approaches. In this type of cellular immunotherapy, the production of ex vivo DCs is necessary, and there are several protocols for this purpose. The aim of the present work was to compare two differentiation protocols, Fast (1 day) and Conventional (6 days), while four different maturation cocktails were also tested, where samples from 8 healthy donors were used. For this comparison, the immunophenotypic profile, uptake capacity, cytokine production and metabolic activity were assessed. The results showed that, despite some differences, the cells differentiated by the Fast protocol had a phenotypic profile and uptake capacity very similar to Conventional DCs. Regarding the response to the different maturation conditions, both Fast and Conventional CDs matured more effectively when stimulated with the Alpha cocktail or TLR ligands. At the metabolic level, the main differences between protocols were related to the higher glycolytic and/or glutaminolytic activity of the cells differentiated by the Conventional method. In terms of maturation, the Alpha cocktail appeared to stimulate glutaminolysis, while maturation with the Standard cocktail appeared to favor glycolysis.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-20T00:00:00Z
2019-12-20
2021-12-21T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29894
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29894
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137676969902080