Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rainford, Louise
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Joana, Alves, Francisco, Figueiredo, João, Hoeschen, Christoph, Damilakis, John, Frija, Guy, Andersson, Jonas, McNulty, Jonathan, Foley, Shane, Bacher, Klaus, Nestle, Ursula, Hierath, Monika, Paulo, Graciano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861
Resumo: Background: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.
id RCAP_1600c3ad3a6a76f3ad8576ed04a9d9e6
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41861
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll projectRadiation protectionEducationSWOT analysisTrainer developmentProteção radiológicaEducaçãoBackground: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.Springer OpenRepositório ComumRainford, LouiseSantos, JoanaAlves, FranciscoFigueiredo, JoãoHoeschen, ChristophDamilakis, JohnFrija, GuyAndersson, JonasMcNulty, JonathanFoley, ShaneBacher, KlausNestle, UrsulaHierath, MonikaPaulo, Graciano2022-09-28T16:10:40Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861eng1869-410110.1186/s13244-022-01271-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-05-18T02:15:34Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41861Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:10:27.920748Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
spellingShingle Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
Rainford, Louise
Radiation protection
Education
SWOT analysis
Trainer development
Proteção radiológica
Educação
title_short Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_full Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_fullStr Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_full_unstemmed Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_sort Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
author Rainford, Louise
author_facet Rainford, Louise
Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
author_role author
author2 Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rainford, Louise
Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Radiation protection
Education
SWOT analysis
Trainer development
Proteção radiológica
Educação
topic Radiation protection
Education
SWOT analysis
Trainer development
Proteção radiológica
Educação
description Background: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-28T16:10:40Z
2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1869-4101
10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Open
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Open
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130561058439168