Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861 |
Resumo: | Background: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains. |
id |
RCAP_1600c3ad3a6a76f3ad8576ed04a9d9e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41861 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll projectRadiation protectionEducationSWOT analysisTrainer developmentProteção radiológicaEducaçãoBackground: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.Springer OpenRepositório ComumRainford, LouiseSantos, JoanaAlves, FranciscoFigueiredo, JoãoHoeschen, ChristophDamilakis, JohnFrija, GuyAndersson, JonasMcNulty, JonathanFoley, ShaneBacher, KlausNestle, UrsulaHierath, MonikaPaulo, Graciano2022-09-28T16:10:40Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861eng1869-410110.1186/s13244-022-01271-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-05-18T02:15:34Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/41861Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:10:27.920748Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
spellingShingle |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project Rainford, Louise Radiation protection Education SWOT analysis Trainer development Proteção radiológica Educação |
title_short |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_full |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_fullStr |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_full_unstemmed |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_sort |
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
author |
Rainford, Louise |
author_facet |
Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Comum |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Radiation protection Education SWOT analysis Trainer development Proteção radiológica Educação |
topic |
Radiation protection Education SWOT analysis Trainer development Proteção radiológica Educação |
description |
Background: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. Results: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. Conclusions: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-28T16:10:40Z 2022 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/41861 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1869-4101 10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Open |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Open |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130561058439168 |