Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Roque, Mariana Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323
Resumo: Do “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders.
id RCAP_1e1fcc71376e95d4fca44d78f2f540e1
oai_identifier_str oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/2323
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?Valor da empresaSatisfação no trabalhoMelhores empresas para trabalharCarhartModelo quatro-fatoresValor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatoresDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoDo “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders.Jorge, Maria João da SilvaOliveira, Célia Patrício ValenteIC-OnlineRoque, Mariana Pereira2016-12-22T10:20:47Z2016-11-032016-11-03T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323TID:201465493enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T15:44:51Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/2323Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:46:42.191025Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
title Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
spellingShingle Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
Roque, Mariana Pereira
Valor da empresa
Satisfação no trabalho
Melhores empresas para trabalhar
Carhart
Modelo quatro-fatores
Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
title_full Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
title_fullStr Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
title_full_unstemmed Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
title_sort Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
author Roque, Mariana Pereira
author_facet Roque, Mariana Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Jorge, Maria João da Silva
Oliveira, Célia Patrício Valente
IC-Online
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Roque, Mariana Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Valor da empresa
Satisfação no trabalho
Melhores empresas para trabalhar
Carhart
Modelo quatro-fatores
Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Valor da empresa
Satisfação no trabalho
Melhores empresas para trabalhar
Carhart
Modelo quatro-fatores
Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Do “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-22T10:20:47Z
2016-11-03
2016-11-03T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323
TID:201465493
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323
identifier_str_mv TID:201465493
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136961622966272