Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323 |
Resumo: | Do “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders. |
id |
RCAP_1e1fcc71376e95d4fca44d78f2f540e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/2323 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns?Valor da empresaSatisfação no trabalhoMelhores empresas para trabalharCarhartModelo quatro-fatoresValor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatoresDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoDo “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders.Jorge, Maria João da SilvaOliveira, Célia Patrício ValenteIC-OnlineRoque, Mariana Pereira2016-12-22T10:20:47Z2016-11-032016-11-03T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323TID:201465493enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T15:44:51Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/2323Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:46:42.191025Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
title |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
spellingShingle |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? Roque, Mariana Pereira Valor da empresa Satisfação no trabalho Melhores empresas para trabalhar Carhart Modelo quatro-fatores Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
title_short |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
title_full |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
title_fullStr |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
title_sort |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have higher Stock returns? |
author |
Roque, Mariana Pereira |
author_facet |
Roque, Mariana Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Jorge, Maria João da Silva Oliveira, Célia Patrício Valente IC-Online |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Roque, Mariana Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Valor da empresa Satisfação no trabalho Melhores empresas para trabalhar Carhart Modelo quatro-fatores Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
topic |
Valor da empresa Satisfação no trabalho Melhores empresas para trabalhar Carhart Modelo quatro-fatores Valor da empresa; Satisfação no trabalho; Melhores empresas para trabalhar; Carhart; Modelo quatro-fatores Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
description |
Do “The Best Companies to Work” have Higher Stock Returns? The main purpose of this work is to prove the link between job satisfaction and the firm’s value. The «Best Companies to Work» list give us our measure for job satisfaction. The sample of this work is composed by firms listed in STOXX Europe 600 Index. We compared the monthly returns of a portfolio composed by firms present in the «Best Companies to Work» list with two other benchmark portfolios, using the four-factor model proposed by Carhart (1997), from January 2010 to December 2014. Our results show that the BCWE600 portfolio outperforms both benchmark portfolios. In other words, companies classified as Best Companies to Work generated 0.40%/month and 4.94%/year higher stock returns than their peers over the 2010-2014 period. Also, the market risk in portfolio BCWE600 is inferior compared to other portfolios. This work shows that firms with the most satisfied workers get better results, resulting in higher returns for it’s shareholders. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-22T10:20:47Z 2016-11-03 2016-11-03T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323 TID:201465493 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2323 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:201465493 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136961622966272 |