Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3464 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to develop and preliminary evaluate a teacher’s version of the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire. The Teaching Styles Questionnaire intends to explore the three parental styles as they may be applied to the teacher-student relationship (i.e., authoritative, authoritarian and permissive); items were reworded accordingly. Participants were 128 teachers (93.8% female), 73 of which answered the instrument twice, with a 3-month gap, to ascertain for test-retest reliability, whereas the remaining 51 in addition filled in the Student-Teacher Relationship Questionnaire for validity evidence. Preliminary psychometric analyses confirm that the instrument addresses three teaching styles, which presented with reasonable reliability and validity indicators. The way teachers relate with their students has a significant impact not only on their students’ academic success, but also on their intraclass behavior. The instrument under analyses may prove to be an important tool to better understand this impact, and how it relates to better holistic school outcomes. |
id |
RCAP_1e3e20e8a59c24b95bab64644de9ee4b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/3464 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles QuestionnaireTeaching stylesPsychometricsValidationTeachersThe aim of this study was to develop and preliminary evaluate a teacher’s version of the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire. The Teaching Styles Questionnaire intends to explore the three parental styles as they may be applied to the teacher-student relationship (i.e., authoritative, authoritarian and permissive); items were reworded accordingly. Participants were 128 teachers (93.8% female), 73 of which answered the instrument twice, with a 3-month gap, to ascertain for test-retest reliability, whereas the remaining 51 in addition filled in the Student-Teacher Relationship Questionnaire for validity evidence. Preliminary psychometric analyses confirm that the instrument addresses three teaching styles, which presented with reasonable reliability and validity indicators. The way teachers relate with their students has a significant impact not only on their students’ academic success, but also on their intraclass behavior. The instrument under analyses may prove to be an important tool to better understand this impact, and how it relates to better holistic school outcomes.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia2021-04-22T12:19:32Z2020-08-01T00:00:00Z2020-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/3464eng2183-247110.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1681Carlos, CarolinaVagos, PaulaCarvalhais, Léniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:11:57ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
title |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
spellingShingle |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire Carlos, Carolina Teaching styles Psychometrics Validation Teachers |
title_short |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
title_full |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
title_fullStr |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
title_sort |
Development and preliminary psychometric study of the Teaching Styles Questionnaire |
author |
Carlos, Carolina |
author_facet |
Carlos, Carolina Vagos, Paula Carvalhais, Lénia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vagos, Paula Carvalhais, Lénia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carlos, Carolina Vagos, Paula Carvalhais, Lénia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teaching styles Psychometrics Validation Teachers |
topic |
Teaching styles Psychometrics Validation Teachers |
description |
The aim of this study was to develop and preliminary evaluate a teacher’s version of the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire. The Teaching Styles Questionnaire intends to explore the three parental styles as they may be applied to the teacher-student relationship (i.e., authoritative, authoritarian and permissive); items were reworded accordingly. Participants were 128 teachers (93.8% female), 73 of which answered the instrument twice, with a 3-month gap, to ascertain for test-retest reliability, whereas the remaining 51 in addition filled in the Student-Teacher Relationship Questionnaire for validity evidence. Preliminary psychometric analyses confirm that the instrument addresses three teaching styles, which presented with reasonable reliability and validity indicators. The way teachers relate with their students has a significant impact not only on their students’ academic success, but also on their intraclass behavior. The instrument under analyses may prove to be an important tool to better understand this impact, and how it relates to better holistic school outcomes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-01T00:00:00Z 2020-08 2021-04-22T12:19:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3464 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3464 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2183-2471 10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1681 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777302555420786688 |