Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, Gonçalo Silva
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Delgado, Ricardo Martins, Costa, João, Vaz-Carneiro, António
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652
Resumo: In countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors.
id RCAP_23166730dd2131d6f1da0477ec01ac0d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Prescrição Não-médica versus Prescrição Médica para a Gestão de Doenças Agudas e Crónicas em Cuidados de Saúde Primários e Secundários. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.Acute Disease/therapyChronic Disease/therapyDrug PrescriptionsSystematic ReviewDoença Aguda/tratamentoDoença Crónica/tratamentoPrescrições de MedicamentosRevisão SistemáticaIn countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors.Em países com diversos níveis socioeconómicos, o assegurar dos cuidados de saúde requer a consideração de uma variedade de estratégias, nas quais pode incluir-se a prescrição não-médica. O objetivo desta revisão foi averiguar se a prescrição por profissionais de saúde não-médicos está associada a resultados (outcomes) clínicos e de relevância para o doente comparáveis à prescrição médica. Revisão sistemática de acordo com a metodologia preconizada pela Cochrane. Foram comparados os outcomes em saúde quando a prescrição médica era realizada por um qualquer profissional de saúde não médico (que prescrevesse com um alto grau de autonomia) versus por um médico, no contexto dos cuidados de saúde primários e secundários, e em países de baixo, médio e alto nível socioeconómico. Foram incluídos para análise 46 ensaios clínicos de diferentes desenhos que avaliaram um total de 37 337 indivíduos. A maioria dos estudos baseou-se na gestão da doença crónica em países de nível socioeconómico mais elevado, onde existe evidência que suporta que os outcomes são comparáveis para os marcadores substitutivos de controlo de doença relativos à hipertensão (evidência moderada), controlo de diabetes (evidência elevada) e hipercolesterolemia (evidência moderada), entre outros. A prescrição por enfermeiros e farmacêuticos com níveis variados de formação (pré-graduada, específica e pós-graduada) esteve também associada a outcomes globalmente comparáveis aos obtidos com a prescrição médica relativamente à adesão à medicação, eventos adversos, nível de satisfação global, qualidade de vida e utilização de recursos (hospitalizações, urgências hospitalares e consultas). Os prescritores não médicos frequentemente tiveram suporte médico disponível para facilitar um modelo de prática colaborativa. Com treino e suporte apropriados, a prescrição não-médica por enfermeiros e farmacêuticos é tão efetiva quanto a prescrição médica numa variedade de condições clínicas.Ordem dos Médicos2017-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 7-11Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 7-111646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652/4886Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte, Gonçalo SilvaDelgado, Ricardo MartinsCosta, JoãoVaz-Carneiro, António2022-12-20T11:05:35Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:37.719612Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Prescrição Não-médica versus Prescrição Médica para a Gestão de Doenças Agudas e Crónicas em Cuidados de Saúde Primários e Secundários. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
title Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
spellingShingle Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
Duarte, Gonçalo Silva
Acute Disease/therapy
Chronic Disease/therapy
Drug Prescriptions
Systematic Review
Doença Aguda/tratamento
Doença Crónica/tratamento
Prescrições de Medicamentos
Revisão Sistemática
title_short Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
title_full Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
title_fullStr Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
title_sort Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
author Duarte, Gonçalo Silva
author_facet Duarte, Gonçalo Silva
Delgado, Ricardo Martins
Costa, João
Vaz-Carneiro, António
author_role author
author2 Delgado, Ricardo Martins
Costa, João
Vaz-Carneiro, António
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Gonçalo Silva
Delgado, Ricardo Martins
Costa, João
Vaz-Carneiro, António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acute Disease/therapy
Chronic Disease/therapy
Drug Prescriptions
Systematic Review
Doença Aguda/tratamento
Doença Crónica/tratamento
Prescrições de Medicamentos
Revisão Sistemática
topic Acute Disease/therapy
Chronic Disease/therapy
Drug Prescriptions
Systematic Review
Doença Aguda/tratamento
Doença Crónica/tratamento
Prescrições de Medicamentos
Revisão Sistemática
description In countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652/4886
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 7-11
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 7-11
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130646719758336