Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652 |
Resumo: | In countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors. |
id |
RCAP_23166730dd2131d6f1da0477ec01ac0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Prescrição Não-médica versus Prescrição Médica para a Gestão de Doenças Agudas e Crónicas em Cuidados de Saúde Primários e Secundários. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.Acute Disease/therapyChronic Disease/therapyDrug PrescriptionsSystematic ReviewDoença Aguda/tratamentoDoença Crónica/tratamentoPrescrições de MedicamentosRevisão SistemáticaIn countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors.Em países com diversos níveis socioeconómicos, o assegurar dos cuidados de saúde requer a consideração de uma variedade de estratégias, nas quais pode incluir-se a prescrição não-médica. O objetivo desta revisão foi averiguar se a prescrição por profissionais de saúde não-médicos está associada a resultados (outcomes) clínicos e de relevância para o doente comparáveis à prescrição médica. Revisão sistemática de acordo com a metodologia preconizada pela Cochrane. Foram comparados os outcomes em saúde quando a prescrição médica era realizada por um qualquer profissional de saúde não médico (que prescrevesse com um alto grau de autonomia) versus por um médico, no contexto dos cuidados de saúde primários e secundários, e em países de baixo, médio e alto nível socioeconómico. Foram incluídos para análise 46 ensaios clínicos de diferentes desenhos que avaliaram um total de 37 337 indivíduos. A maioria dos estudos baseou-se na gestão da doença crónica em países de nível socioeconómico mais elevado, onde existe evidência que suporta que os outcomes são comparáveis para os marcadores substitutivos de controlo de doença relativos à hipertensão (evidência moderada), controlo de diabetes (evidência elevada) e hipercolesterolemia (evidência moderada), entre outros. A prescrição por enfermeiros e farmacêuticos com níveis variados de formação (pré-graduada, específica e pós-graduada) esteve também associada a outcomes globalmente comparáveis aos obtidos com a prescrição médica relativamente à adesão à medicação, eventos adversos, nível de satisfação global, qualidade de vida e utilização de recursos (hospitalizações, urgências hospitalares e consultas). Os prescritores não médicos frequentemente tiveram suporte médico disponível para facilitar um modelo de prática colaborativa. Com treino e suporte apropriados, a prescrição não-médica por enfermeiros e farmacêuticos é tão efetiva quanto a prescrição médica numa variedade de condições clínicas.Ordem dos Médicos2017-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 7-11Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 7-111646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652/4886Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte, Gonçalo SilvaDelgado, Ricardo MartinsCosta, JoãoVaz-Carneiro, António2022-12-20T11:05:35Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:37.719612Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Prescrição Não-médica versus Prescrição Médica para a Gestão de Doenças Agudas e Crónicas em Cuidados de Saúde Primários e Secundários. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
title |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. Duarte, Gonçalo Silva Acute Disease/therapy Chronic Disease/therapy Drug Prescriptions Systematic Review Doença Aguda/tratamento Doença Crónica/tratamento Prescrições de Medicamentos Revisão Sistemática |
title_short |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
title_full |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
title_sort |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Non-medical Prescribing versus Medical Prescribing for Acute and Chronic Disease Management in Primary and Secondary Care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227. |
author |
Duarte, Gonçalo Silva |
author_facet |
Duarte, Gonçalo Silva Delgado, Ricardo Martins Costa, João Vaz-Carneiro, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Delgado, Ricardo Martins Costa, João Vaz-Carneiro, António |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte, Gonçalo Silva Delgado, Ricardo Martins Costa, João Vaz-Carneiro, António |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acute Disease/therapy Chronic Disease/therapy Drug Prescriptions Systematic Review Doença Aguda/tratamento Doença Crónica/tratamento Prescrições de Medicamentos Revisão Sistemática |
topic |
Acute Disease/therapy Chronic Disease/therapy Drug Prescriptions Systematic Review Doença Aguda/tratamento Doença Crónica/tratamento Prescrições de Medicamentos Revisão Sistemática |
description |
In countries with diverse socioeconomic levels, in order to address the health care demands, the consideration of a wide array of strategies is needed; among these, non-medical prescription can be included. The objective of this revision was to ascertain whether non-medical prescription results in comparable clinical and patient-related outcomes to medical prescription. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with the standard Cochrane methodology. Clinical outcomes were compared between prescription carried out by non-medical health professionals and doctors, provided that the non-medical health professional prescribed with a high degree of autonomy, both in hospital and community practice, in countries with low, medium and high socioeconomic level. The review included 46 clinical trials, with different designs, with 37 337 participants overall. Most studies were based on the management of chronic disease in higher income countries, where the evidence supports comparable outcomes for the markers of disease relative to high blood pressure (moderate-certainty of evidence), diabetes control (high-certainty of evidence); high cholesterol (moderatecertaintyof evidence), among others. Prescription by pharmacists and nurses with different levels of undergraduate, specific and postgraduate education could provide comparable outcomes to medical prescription, specifically with regards to adherence to therapy, adverse events, overall satisfaction, quality of life, and resource utilisation (hospitalisations, visits to the emergency department, and consultations). Non-medical prescribers frequently had medical support available to facilitate a collaborative practice. With appropriate training and support, non-medical prescription by nurses and pharmacists can be as effective as when carried out by doctors. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8652 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8652/4886 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 7-11 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 7-11 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130646719758336 |