Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The objective of this study was to adapt the Brazilian version, and verify the validity, reliability and internal consistency of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people.Material and Methods: The questionnaire was translated from European Portuguese into Brazilian Portuguese by means of translation and re-translation. The validity of the contents was determined by experts who analyzed the clarity and pertinence of the questions. Fifteen young people aged 15 to 18 took part in the pre-test step (qualitative analysis), 40 in the test-retest (reliability) and 679 in the evaluation of internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient and Spearman’s correlation coefficient were used in the reliability analysis (test-retest), and Cronbach’s alpha to determine the internal consistency (stability).Results: In the translation phase the questionnaire was modified and considered suitable, observing similarity and equivalence of the two versions. After being corrected by the experts in the validation of the contents, the instrument was considered suitable and valid, and in the pre-test, the young people suggested some modifications to make the questionnaire more succinct. With respect to reliability, the values for the intra-class correlation coefficient were between 0.512 – acceptable and 1 – excellent and Spearman’s correlation coefficient varied between 0.525 and 1, classifying the instrument as reproducible. The internal consistency was considered acceptable with a 0.757 Cronbach’s alpha.Discussion: The Oliveira questionnaire was choosen since it has been used in several Portuguese studies; moreover, it addresses the need to raise data regarding low back pain and associated risk factors.Conclusions: The Brazilian version of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people showed valid and reliable cultural adaptation, with good reliability and stability. |
id |
RCAP_239eee8495bc3a8fa31783ea0d76f6fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8270 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young PeopleFiabilidade, Estabilidade e Validade da Adaptação Brasileira do Questionário Oliveira para Dor Lombar em JovensAdolescentBrazilLow Back PainPain MeasurementReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesValidation StudiesAdolescenteBrasilDor LombarEstudos de ValidaçãoInquéritos e QuestionáriosMedição da DorReprodutibilidade dos ResultadosIntroduction: The objective of this study was to adapt the Brazilian version, and verify the validity, reliability and internal consistency of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people.Material and Methods: The questionnaire was translated from European Portuguese into Brazilian Portuguese by means of translation and re-translation. The validity of the contents was determined by experts who analyzed the clarity and pertinence of the questions. Fifteen young people aged 15 to 18 took part in the pre-test step (qualitative analysis), 40 in the test-retest (reliability) and 679 in the evaluation of internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient and Spearman’s correlation coefficient were used in the reliability analysis (test-retest), and Cronbach’s alpha to determine the internal consistency (stability).Results: In the translation phase the questionnaire was modified and considered suitable, observing similarity and equivalence of the two versions. After being corrected by the experts in the validation of the contents, the instrument was considered suitable and valid, and in the pre-test, the young people suggested some modifications to make the questionnaire more succinct. With respect to reliability, the values for the intra-class correlation coefficient were between 0.512 – acceptable and 1 – excellent and Spearman’s correlation coefficient varied between 0.525 and 1, classifying the instrument as reproducible. The internal consistency was considered acceptable with a 0.757 Cronbach’s alpha.Discussion: The Oliveira questionnaire was choosen since it has been used in several Portuguese studies; moreover, it addresses the need to raise data regarding low back pain and associated risk factors.Conclusions: The Brazilian version of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people showed valid and reliable cultural adaptation, with good reliability and stability.Introdução: O objectivo deste estudo foi adaptar a versão brasileira, verificar a validade, a fiabilidade e a consistência interna do questionário de Oliveira para dor lombar em jovens.Material e Métodos: A tradução do questionário do português de Portugal para o português do Brasil foi realizado através de tradução e re-tradução. A validade de conteúdo foi realizada por experts que analisaram a clareza e pertinência das questões. Participaram das etapas de pré-teste 15 jovens (análise qualitativa), teste-reteste 40 jovens (fiabilidade) e avaliação da consistência interna 679 jovens, com idade de 15 a 18 anos. Na análise da fiabilidade (teste-reteste) usou-se o coeficiente de correlação intra-classe e o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman, na consistência interna (estabilidade) o alpha de Cronbach.Resultados: Na fase de tradução o questionário foi modificado e considerado adequado, observando-se similaridade e equivalência nas duas versões. Na validação de conteúdo, após as correções dos peritos, o instrumento foi considerado adequado e válido. Os jovens no pré-teste sugeriram modificações tornando o questionário mais sucinto. Quanto a fiabilidade, os valores para o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse foram de 0,512 - aceitável a 1 - excelente, o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman variou entre 0,525 a 1; estes valores classificam o instrumento como reprodutível. A consistência interna foi considerada aceitável alpha de Cronbach de 0,757.Discussão: O questionário Oliveira foi escolhido por ter sido utilizado em vários estudos em Portugal; além disso, atende a necessidade de levantar dados sobre dor lombar e fatores de risco associados.Conclusão: A versão brasileira do questionário de Oliveira para dor lombar em jovens tem adaptação cultural válida e fiável, com boa confiabilidade e estabilidade.Ordem dos Médicos2017-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/mswordapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8270Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 10 (2017): October; 691-698Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 10 (2017): Outubro; 691-6981646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPengporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/5200https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/5201https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/8793https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/8794https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9047https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9048https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9336https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9337https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9338https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9339https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9408https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9681Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchwertner, Debora SoccalOliveira, RaulMarinho, Ana Paula RamosBenetti, MagnusBeltrame, Thais SilvaCapistrano, Renata2022-12-20T11:05:28Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8270Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:34.083085Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People Fiabilidade, Estabilidade e Validade da Adaptação Brasileira do Questionário Oliveira para Dor Lombar em Jovens |
title |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
spellingShingle |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People Schwertner, Debora Soccal Adolescent Brazil Low Back Pain Pain Measurement Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validation Studies Adolescente Brasil Dor Lombar Estudos de Validação Inquéritos e Questionários Medição da Dor Reprodutibilidade dos Resultados |
title_short |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
title_full |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
title_fullStr |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
title_sort |
Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People |
author |
Schwertner, Debora Soccal |
author_facet |
Schwertner, Debora Soccal Oliveira, Raul Marinho, Ana Paula Ramos Benetti, Magnus Beltrame, Thais Silva Capistrano, Renata |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Raul Marinho, Ana Paula Ramos Benetti, Magnus Beltrame, Thais Silva Capistrano, Renata |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schwertner, Debora Soccal Oliveira, Raul Marinho, Ana Paula Ramos Benetti, Magnus Beltrame, Thais Silva Capistrano, Renata |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adolescent Brazil Low Back Pain Pain Measurement Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validation Studies Adolescente Brasil Dor Lombar Estudos de Validação Inquéritos e Questionários Medição da Dor Reprodutibilidade dos Resultados |
topic |
Adolescent Brazil Low Back Pain Pain Measurement Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validation Studies Adolescente Brasil Dor Lombar Estudos de Validação Inquéritos e Questionários Medição da Dor Reprodutibilidade dos Resultados |
description |
Introduction: The objective of this study was to adapt the Brazilian version, and verify the validity, reliability and internal consistency of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people.Material and Methods: The questionnaire was translated from European Portuguese into Brazilian Portuguese by means of translation and re-translation. The validity of the contents was determined by experts who analyzed the clarity and pertinence of the questions. Fifteen young people aged 15 to 18 took part in the pre-test step (qualitative analysis), 40 in the test-retest (reliability) and 679 in the evaluation of internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient and Spearman’s correlation coefficient were used in the reliability analysis (test-retest), and Cronbach’s alpha to determine the internal consistency (stability).Results: In the translation phase the questionnaire was modified and considered suitable, observing similarity and equivalence of the two versions. After being corrected by the experts in the validation of the contents, the instrument was considered suitable and valid, and in the pre-test, the young people suggested some modifications to make the questionnaire more succinct. With respect to reliability, the values for the intra-class correlation coefficient were between 0.512 – acceptable and 1 – excellent and Spearman’s correlation coefficient varied between 0.525 and 1, classifying the instrument as reproducible. The internal consistency was considered acceptable with a 0.757 Cronbach’s alpha.Discussion: The Oliveira questionnaire was choosen since it has been used in several Portuguese studies; moreover, it addresses the need to raise data regarding low back pain and associated risk factors.Conclusions: The Brazilian version of the Oliveira questionnaire on low back pain in young people showed valid and reliable cultural adaptation, with good reliability and stability. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8270 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8270 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/5200 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/5201 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/8793 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/8794 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9047 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9048 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9336 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9337 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9338 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9339 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9408 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8270/9681 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/msword application/msword application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/msword application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 10 (2017): October; 691-698 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 10 (2017): Outubro; 691-698 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130646579249152 |