VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal. |
id |
RCAP_26b3b705b6bcde70c31ddbe976596be4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3803 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison StudyCHLC OFTIntraocular Lens Power Calculation FormulasBiometryCataractPhacoemulsificationFormulas AccuracyPurpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal.Dove PressRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEHipólito-Fernandes, DLuís, MEGil, PMaduro, VFeijão, JYeo, TVoytsekhivskyy, OAlves, N2021-08-09T14:22:18Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803engClin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 16;14:4395-4402.10.2147/OPTH.S290125.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:44:20Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3803Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:21:07.368686Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
title |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
spellingShingle |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study Hipólito-Fernandes, D CHLC OFT Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Biometry Cataract Phacoemulsification Formulas Accuracy |
title_short |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
title_full |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
title_fullStr |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
title_sort |
VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study |
author |
Hipólito-Fernandes, D |
author_facet |
Hipólito-Fernandes, D Luís, ME Gil, P Maduro, V Feijão, J Yeo, T Voytsekhivskyy, O Alves, N |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luís, ME Gil, P Maduro, V Feijão, J Yeo, T Voytsekhivskyy, O Alves, N |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hipólito-Fernandes, D Luís, ME Gil, P Maduro, V Feijão, J Yeo, T Voytsekhivskyy, O Alves, N |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CHLC OFT Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Biometry Cataract Phacoemulsification Formulas Accuracy |
topic |
CHLC OFT Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Biometry Cataract Phacoemulsification Formulas Accuracy |
description |
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021-08-09T14:22:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 16;14:4395-4402. 10.2147/OPTH.S290125. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dove Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dove Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131307516624896 |