VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hipólito-Fernandes, D
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Luís, ME, Gil, P, Maduro, V, Feijão, J, Yeo, T, Voytsekhivskyy, O, Alves, N
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803
Resumo: Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal.
id RCAP_26b3b705b6bcde70c31ddbe976596be4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3803
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison StudyCHLC OFTIntraocular Lens Power Calculation FormulasBiometryCataractPhacoemulsificationFormulas AccuracyPurpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal.Dove PressRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEHipólito-Fernandes, DLuís, MEGil, PMaduro, VFeijão, JYeo, TVoytsekhivskyy, OAlves, N2021-08-09T14:22:18Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803engClin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 16;14:4395-4402.10.2147/OPTH.S290125.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:44:20Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3803Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:21:07.368686Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
title VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
spellingShingle VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
Hipólito-Fernandes, D
CHLC OFT
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas
Biometry
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Formulas Accuracy
title_short VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
title_full VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
title_fullStr VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
title_sort VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
author Hipólito-Fernandes, D
author_facet Hipólito-Fernandes, D
Luís, ME
Gil, P
Maduro, V
Feijão, J
Yeo, T
Voytsekhivskyy, O
Alves, N
author_role author
author2 Luís, ME
Gil, P
Maduro, V
Feijão, J
Yeo, T
Voytsekhivskyy, O
Alves, N
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hipólito-Fernandes, D
Luís, ME
Gil, P
Maduro, V
Feijão, J
Yeo, T
Voytsekhivskyy, O
Alves, N
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CHLC OFT
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas
Biometry
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Formulas Accuracy
topic CHLC OFT
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas
Biometry
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Formulas Accuracy
description Purpose: To compare the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power formula (VRF-G) with twelve existing formulas (Barret Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 2.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, Næeser 2, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, T2 and VRF). Methods: Retrospective case series including 828 patients having uncomplicated cataract surgery with the implantation of a single IOL model (SN60WF). Using optimised constants, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the axial length (short ≤22.0mm; medium >22.0mm to <26.0mm; long ≥26.0mm). Main outcomes included mean prediction error (ME) mean (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25D, ±0.50D, ±0.75D and ±1.00D. Results: Formulas absolute errors were statistically different among them (p<0.001), with Kane having the lowest MAE of all formulas, followed by EVO 2.0 and VRF-G, which had the lowest MedAE. The Kane formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25D (47.0%) and ±1.00D (97.7%) and the VRF-G formula had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50D (79.5%). For all AL subgroups, Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas had the most accurate performances (lowest MAE). Conclusion: New generation formulas may help us in achieving better refractive results, lowering the variance in accuracy in extreme eyes - Kane, EVO 2.0 and VRF-G formulas are promising candidates to fulfil that goal.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021-08-09T14:22:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3803
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 16;14:4395-4402.
10.2147/OPTH.S290125.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131307516624896