Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Joana Fojo
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Conceição, Nuno, Branco Vasco, António
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
Resumo: Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta­?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta­?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta­-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
id RCAP_2928b7c5eae488d0b0d0397863477f5a
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/284
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity ModelMovimentação e diferenciação narrativa ao longo do processo terapêutico: Um estudo de caso longitudinal à luz do modelo de complementaridade-Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta­?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta­?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta­-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284As narrativas são frequentemente consideradas o meio por excelência de reconhecimento e reorganização da experiência interna dos pacientes. Neste estudo procurou­?se diferenciar e identificar potenciais marcadores narrativos de capacidade de processamento e, ao quantificá­?los em diferentes momentos do processo terapêutico, verificar se existia evidência a favor da proposta de sequencialização do trabalho terapêutico do Meta­?modelo de Complementaridade Paradigmática, em termos de estratégias gerais. Foram definidos, reconhecidos e analisados processos narrativos a nível molecular (a partir da revisão de literatura) e a nível molar (a partir da teoria do meta­?modelo supra­?referido). Em ambos os casos, enfatizou­?se as formas e capacidades de processamento da informação em detrimento dos conteúdos narrados. Os resultados evidenciaram diferenciação e movimentação entre as fases consideradas para processos moleculares e molares, e nestes últimos reconheceu­?se um padrão de progressão narrativa de acordo com a sequencialidade proposta pelo modelo, para as fases em estudo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2011); 173-201PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 N.º 1 (2011); 173-2012183-24710874-2049reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284/47Ferreira, Joana FojoConceição, NunoBranco Vasco, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T12:48:55Zoai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/284Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:10:11.270999Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
Movimentação e diferenciação narrativa ao longo do processo terapêutico: Um estudo de caso longitudinal à luz do modelo de complementaridade
title Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
spellingShingle Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
Ferreira, Joana Fojo
-
title_short Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
title_full Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
title_fullStr Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
title_full_unstemmed Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
title_sort Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
author Ferreira, Joana Fojo
author_facet Ferreira, Joana Fojo
Conceição, Nuno
Branco Vasco, António
author_role author
author2 Conceição, Nuno
Branco Vasco, António
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Joana Fojo
Conceição, Nuno
Branco Vasco, António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv -
topic -
description Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta­?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta­?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta­-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
url https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284
https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284/47
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2011); 173-201
PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 N.º 1 (2011); 173-201
2183-2471
0874-2049
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134656209092608