Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 |
Resumo: | Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 |
id |
RCAP_2928b7c5eae488d0b0d0397863477f5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/284 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity ModelMovimentação e diferenciação narrativa ao longo do processo terapêutico: Um estudo de caso longitudinal à luz do modelo de complementaridade-Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284As narrativas são frequentemente consideradas o meio por excelência de reconhecimento e reorganização da experiência interna dos pacientes. Neste estudo procurou?se diferenciar e identificar potenciais marcadores narrativos de capacidade de processamento e, ao quantificá?los em diferentes momentos do processo terapêutico, verificar se existia evidência a favor da proposta de sequencialização do trabalho terapêutico do Meta?modelo de Complementaridade Paradigmática, em termos de estratégias gerais. Foram definidos, reconhecidos e analisados processos narrativos a nível molecular (a partir da revisão de literatura) e a nível molar (a partir da teoria do meta?modelo supra?referido). Em ambos os casos, enfatizou?se as formas e capacidades de processamento da informação em detrimento dos conteúdos narrados. Os resultados evidenciaram diferenciação e movimentação entre as fases consideradas para processos moleculares e molares, e nestes últimos reconheceu?se um padrão de progressão narrativa de acordo com a sequencialidade proposta pelo modelo, para as fases em estudo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2011); 173-201PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 N.º 1 (2011); 173-2012183-24710874-2049reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284/47Ferreira, Joana FojoConceição, NunoBranco Vasco, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T12:48:55Zoai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/284Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:10:11.270999Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model Movimentação e diferenciação narrativa ao longo do processo terapêutico: Um estudo de caso longitudinal à luz do modelo de complementaridade |
title |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
spellingShingle |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model Ferreira, Joana Fojo - |
title_short |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
title_full |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
title_fullStr |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
title_sort |
Narrative Progress and Differentiation along the Therapeutic Process: A Longitudinal Case-Study within the Paradigmatic Complementarity Model |
author |
Ferreira, Joana Fojo |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Joana Fojo Conceição, Nuno Branco Vasco, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Conceição, Nuno Branco Vasco, António |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Joana Fojo Conceição, Nuno Branco Vasco, António |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
- |
topic |
- |
description |
Narratives are frequently considered the best means for recognizing and reorganizing patients’ internal experience. In this study we tried to differentiate and identify potential narrative markers of processing capacity and, by quantifying them at different moments in the therapeutic process, check if there was evidence in favor of the proposal of sequencing of the therapeutic work, in terms of general strategies, as postulated by the Meta?model of Paradigmatic Complementarity. Narrative processes were defined, recognized and analyzed at a molecular level (based on literature review on narrative) and at a molar level (based on the meta?model identified above). In both cases processing capacities were emphasized rather than the narrated contents. Both at the molecular and molar levels, the results show differentiation and movement along the phases under scrutiny. Besides, a pattern of narrative progression was recognized at the molar level, according to the sequence proposed by the meta-model (...) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.284 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284 https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/284/47 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2011); 173-201 PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 25 N.º 1 (2011); 173-201 2183-2471 0874-2049 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134656209092608 |