COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magni, Beatrice
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.99
Resumo: In a compromise parties make a strategic calculation that a sacrifice of some their commitments is the best tactic to advance their other values and interests over their current positions. But if we try to figure a compromise as a way to get to agreements that can minimize harm and promote mutual respect between individuals, and could increase the level of cooperation between them, we can consider a compromise shaped in that way as an agreement that can translate at its best some of the individual’s deliberative ideals, as fairness and mutual respect. This kind of compromise will be different from simple negotiation, and more demanding to each one of the parties. It will require first and foremost a reciprocal recognition of moral fairness. But can we ever compromise on matters of ethical principle without compromising our integrity?
id RCAP_2a8a61c70ece87cf0a60d4faa68563f5
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5309
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKSCOMPROMISSO E / OU INTEGRIDADE? ALGUMAS OBSERVAÇÕES NORMATIVASRADICALISM AND COMPROMISEIn a compromise parties make a strategic calculation that a sacrifice of some their commitments is the best tactic to advance their other values and interests over their current positions. But if we try to figure a compromise as a way to get to agreements that can minimize harm and promote mutual respect between individuals, and could increase the level of cooperation between them, we can consider a compromise shaped in that way as an agreement that can translate at its best some of the individual’s deliberative ideals, as fairness and mutual respect. This kind of compromise will be different from simple negotiation, and more demanding to each one of the parties. It will require first and foremost a reciprocal recognition of moral fairness. But can we ever compromise on matters of ethical principle without compromising our integrity?Num acordo, as partes fazem um cálculo estratégico de que o sacrifício de alguns dos seus compromissos é a melhor tática para avançar os seus outros valores e interesses sobre as suas posições atuais. Mas se tentarmos chegar a um compromisso como forma de chegar a acordos que possam minimizar danos e promover o respeito mútuo entre indivíduos, e aumentar o nível de cooperação entre eles, podemos considerar um compromisso moldado dessa forma como um acordo que pode traduzir no seu melhor alguns dos ideais deliberativos do indivíduo, como justiça e respeito mútuo. Esse tipo de compromisso será diferente da simples negociação e mais exigente para cada uma das partes. Exigirá, antes de tudo, um reconhecimento recíproco da equidade moral. Mas será que podemos fazer compromissos envolvendo princípios éticos sem comprometer a nossa integridade?Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho2023-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.99eng2184-25822184-2574Magni, Beatriceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-29T10:56:38Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5309Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:42.534544Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
COMPROMISSO E / OU INTEGRIDADE? ALGUMAS OBSERVAÇÕES NORMATIVAS
title COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
spellingShingle COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
Magni, Beatrice
RADICALISM AND COMPROMISE
title_short COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
title_full COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
title_fullStr COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
title_full_unstemmed COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
title_sort COMPROMISE AND/OR INTEGRITY? SOME NORMATIVE REMARKS
author Magni, Beatrice
author_facet Magni, Beatrice
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magni, Beatrice
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv RADICALISM AND COMPROMISE
topic RADICALISM AND COMPROMISE
description In a compromise parties make a strategic calculation that a sacrifice of some their commitments is the best tactic to advance their other values and interests over their current positions. But if we try to figure a compromise as a way to get to agreements that can minimize harm and promote mutual respect between individuals, and could increase the level of cooperation between them, we can consider a compromise shaped in that way as an agreement that can translate at its best some of the individual’s deliberative ideals, as fairness and mutual respect. This kind of compromise will be different from simple negotiation, and more demanding to each one of the parties. It will require first and foremost a reciprocal recognition of moral fairness. But can we ever compromise on matters of ethical principle without compromising our integrity?
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.99
url https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.99
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-2582
2184-2574
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137071323938816