The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Côrte-Real, Paulo P.
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Pereira, Paulo Trigo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/22903
Resumo: We analyze single binary-choice voting rules and identify the presence of the No-show paradox in this simple setting, as a consequence of specific turnout or quorum conditions that are included in actual rules. Since these conditions are meant to ensure a representative outcome, we try to formalize this concern and reach our main result: no voting rule can ensure representation if abstention is possible, unless specific restrictive assumptions are made on the preference domain of abstainers. We then focus on the main referendum systems and show that appropriate restrictions do make them compatible with representation. The main purpose of our paper is, however, to provide a tool for referendum design. Unawareness of the fact that defining a representative voting system necessarily entails restrictions on the preference domain of non-voters may lead to the imposition of restrictions that do not satisfy any deliberate criteria and generate such problems as the No-show paradox. We therefore recommend instead that a conscious choice be made on how abstention is to be interpreted and that this choice be used as a tool to derive the corresponding referendum rule
id RCAP_2d68ba90b0240bfd4c7333074f2fedf6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/22903
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstentionReferendumRepresentative Voting SystemAbstentionWe analyze single binary-choice voting rules and identify the presence of the No-show paradox in this simple setting, as a consequence of specific turnout or quorum conditions that are included in actual rules. Since these conditions are meant to ensure a representative outcome, we try to formalize this concern and reach our main result: no voting rule can ensure representation if abstention is possible, unless specific restrictive assumptions are made on the preference domain of abstainers. We then focus on the main referendum systems and show that appropriate restrictions do make them compatible with representation. The main purpose of our paper is, however, to provide a tool for referendum design. Unawareness of the fact that defining a representative voting system necessarily entails restrictions on the preference domain of non-voters may lead to the imposition of restrictions that do not satisfy any deliberate criteria and generate such problems as the No-show paradox. We therefore recommend instead that a conscious choice be made on how abstention is to be interpreted and that this choice be used as a tool to derive the corresponding referendum ruleRepositório da Universidade de LisboaCôrte-Real, Paulo P.Pereira, Paulo Trigo2022-01-04T20:52:43Z20022002-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/22903engCôrte-Real, Paulo P. e Paulo Trigo Pereira. 2002. " The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention". Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão - DE Working papers nº 4-2002/DE/CISEP0874-4548info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:52:26Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/22903Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:07:14.867494Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
title The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
spellingShingle The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
Côrte-Real, Paulo P.
Referendum
Representative Voting System
Abstention
title_short The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
title_full The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
title_fullStr The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
title_full_unstemmed The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
title_sort The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention
author Côrte-Real, Paulo P.
author_facet Côrte-Real, Paulo P.
Pereira, Paulo Trigo
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Paulo Trigo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Côrte-Real, Paulo P.
Pereira, Paulo Trigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Referendum
Representative Voting System
Abstention
topic Referendum
Representative Voting System
Abstention
description We analyze single binary-choice voting rules and identify the presence of the No-show paradox in this simple setting, as a consequence of specific turnout or quorum conditions that are included in actual rules. Since these conditions are meant to ensure a representative outcome, we try to formalize this concern and reach our main result: no voting rule can ensure representation if abstention is possible, unless specific restrictive assumptions are made on the preference domain of abstainers. We then focus on the main referendum systems and show that appropriate restrictions do make them compatible with representation. The main purpose of our paper is, however, to provide a tool for referendum design. Unawareness of the fact that defining a representative voting system necessarily entails restrictions on the preference domain of non-voters may lead to the imposition of restrictions that do not satisfy any deliberate criteria and generate such problems as the No-show paradox. We therefore recommend instead that a conscious choice be made on how abstention is to be interpreted and that this choice be used as a tool to derive the corresponding referendum rule
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002
2002-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-01-04T20:52:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/22903
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/22903
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Côrte-Real, Paulo P. e Paulo Trigo Pereira. 2002. " The voter who wasn't there: referenda, representation and abstention". Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão - DE Working papers nº 4-2002/DE/CISEP
0874-4548
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131165625417728