Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Freitas, Sandra, Beato-Coelho, José, Ribeiro, Joana, Parra, Joana, Martins, Cristina, Silva, Miguel, Matos, Maria Assunção, Nogueira, Ana Rita, Silva, Fernando, Sargento-Freitas, João, Cordeiro, Gustavo, Cunha, Luís, Santana, Isabel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090
Resumo: Introduction: Classical aphasia evaluation scales are too long to use in the context of acute stroke or as a monitoring tool. The Aphasia Rapid Test is a 26-point scale developed as a bedside assessment to rate aphasia severity in acute stroke patients in less than 3 minutes. We aimed to adapt and validate this scale for European Portuguese.Material and Methods: We evaluated 56 acute stroke patients in the first and in the seventh days post-stroke. In the seventh day, patients were evaluated by two independent raters, to evaluate inter-rater agreement. To study concurrent validity, the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was applied to a subset of 20 patients. The predictive ability of the Aphasia Rapid Test was assessed at six months, by the aphasia subscale of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.Results: Translation to European Portuguese was based in the French and English versions, considering the words’ utilization frequency. The Chronbach’s alpha was 0.796. The concordance coefficient between the two raters was excellent (0.985). Correlation between Aphasia Rapid Test and the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was strong (r = -0.958, p < 0.001). The study through Bland-Altman graphs corroborated the good inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity of the test. The Aphasia Rapid Test score in the first day is an independent predictor of long-term outcome.Discussion: This study provides reliable results for European Portuguese, with adequate internal consistency, inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity.Conclusion: The Aphasia Rapid Test is a good tool for the evaluation and monitoring of aphasia in stroke patients.
id RCAP_3128c84efc628b2da318c7e3a3d2f3e9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9090
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese PopulationAphasia Rapid Test: Estudos de Tradução, Adaptação e Validação para a População PortuguesaAphasia/diagnosisNeuropsychological TestsPortugalStrokeTreatment OutcomeAcidente Vascular CerebralAfasia/diagnósticoPortugalResultado do TratamentoTestes NeuropsicológicosIntroduction: Classical aphasia evaluation scales are too long to use in the context of acute stroke or as a monitoring tool. The Aphasia Rapid Test is a 26-point scale developed as a bedside assessment to rate aphasia severity in acute stroke patients in less than 3 minutes. We aimed to adapt and validate this scale for European Portuguese.Material and Methods: We evaluated 56 acute stroke patients in the first and in the seventh days post-stroke. In the seventh day, patients were evaluated by two independent raters, to evaluate inter-rater agreement. To study concurrent validity, the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was applied to a subset of 20 patients. The predictive ability of the Aphasia Rapid Test was assessed at six months, by the aphasia subscale of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.Results: Translation to European Portuguese was based in the French and English versions, considering the words’ utilization frequency. The Chronbach’s alpha was 0.796. The concordance coefficient between the two raters was excellent (0.985). Correlation between Aphasia Rapid Test and the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was strong (r = -0.958, p < 0.001). The study through Bland-Altman graphs corroborated the good inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity of the test. The Aphasia Rapid Test score in the first day is an independent predictor of long-term outcome.Discussion: This study provides reliable results for European Portuguese, with adequate internal consistency, inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity.Conclusion: The Aphasia Rapid Test is a good tool for the evaluation and monitoring of aphasia in stroke patients.Introdução: As baterias clássicas de caracterização de afasia são demasiado longas para serem utilizadas no contexto do acidente vascular cerebral agudo ou como ferramenta de monitorização. O Aphasia Rapid Test é uma escala de 26 pontos desenvolvida como teste de cabeceira para avaliar a gravidade da afasia num doente com acidente vascular cerebral em menos de três minutos. O objetivo do estudo é adaptar e validar a escala para o português europeu.Material e Métodos: Foram avaliados 56 doentes com acidente vascular cerebral no primeiro e sétimo dia pós-acidente vascular cerebral. Ao sétimo dia, foram avaliados por dois avaliadores independentes para avaliar o acordo interavaliadores. Para estudar a validade concorrente, a 20 doentes foi aplicada também a Bateria de Avaliação de Afasias de Lisboa. A capacidade preditiva do Aphasia Rapid Test foi avaliada aos seis meses, através do valor da subescala de afasia do National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.Resultados: A tradução para o português europeu baseou-se nas versões francesa e inglesa, respeitando a frequência de utilização das palavras. O α de Cronbach foi de 0,796. O coeficiente de concordância entre examinadores foi excelente (0,985). A correlação entre o Aphasia Rapid Test e a Bateria de Avaliação de Afasias de Lisboa é forte (r = -0,958, p < 0,001). Os gráficos de Bland-Altman corroboram as boas concordâncias interavaliadores e validade concorrente. O Aphasia Rapid Test no primeiro dia é preditor independente do resultado a longo prazo.Discussão: Este estudo apresenta resultados confiáveis para o português europeu, com valores de consistência interna, concordância interavaliadores e validade concorrente adequados.Conclusão: O Aphasia Rapid Test é um bom instrumento para avaliação e monitorização da afasia em doentes com acidente vascular cerebral.Ordem dos Médicos2018-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9090Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2018): May; 265-271Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 5 (2018): Maio; 265-2711646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/5429https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/6046https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/5431https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/9653https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10086https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10087https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10199https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10200https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10201Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTábuas-Pereira, MiguelFreitas, SandraBeato-Coelho, JoséRibeiro, JoanaParra, JoanaMartins, CristinaSilva, MiguelMatos, Maria AssunçãoNogueira, Ana RitaSilva, FernandoSargento-Freitas, JoãoCordeiro, GustavoCunha, LuísSantana, Isabel2022-12-20T11:05:41Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9090Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:40.684231Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
Aphasia Rapid Test: Estudos de Tradução, Adaptação e Validação para a População Portuguesa
title Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
spellingShingle Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
Aphasia/diagnosis
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
Acidente Vascular Cerebral
Afasia/diagnóstico
Portugal
Resultado do Tratamento
Testes Neuropsicológicos
title_short Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
title_full Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
title_fullStr Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
title_full_unstemmed Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
title_sort Aphasia Rapid Test: Translation, Adaptation and Validation Studies for the Portuguese Population
author Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
author_facet Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
Freitas, Sandra
Beato-Coelho, José
Ribeiro, Joana
Parra, Joana
Martins, Cristina
Silva, Miguel
Matos, Maria Assunção
Nogueira, Ana Rita
Silva, Fernando
Sargento-Freitas, João
Cordeiro, Gustavo
Cunha, Luís
Santana, Isabel
author_role author
author2 Freitas, Sandra
Beato-Coelho, José
Ribeiro, Joana
Parra, Joana
Martins, Cristina
Silva, Miguel
Matos, Maria Assunção
Nogueira, Ana Rita
Silva, Fernando
Sargento-Freitas, João
Cordeiro, Gustavo
Cunha, Luís
Santana, Isabel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
Freitas, Sandra
Beato-Coelho, José
Ribeiro, Joana
Parra, Joana
Martins, Cristina
Silva, Miguel
Matos, Maria Assunção
Nogueira, Ana Rita
Silva, Fernando
Sargento-Freitas, João
Cordeiro, Gustavo
Cunha, Luís
Santana, Isabel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aphasia/diagnosis
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
Acidente Vascular Cerebral
Afasia/diagnóstico
Portugal
Resultado do Tratamento
Testes Neuropsicológicos
topic Aphasia/diagnosis
Neuropsychological Tests
Portugal
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
Acidente Vascular Cerebral
Afasia/diagnóstico
Portugal
Resultado do Tratamento
Testes Neuropsicológicos
description Introduction: Classical aphasia evaluation scales are too long to use in the context of acute stroke or as a monitoring tool. The Aphasia Rapid Test is a 26-point scale developed as a bedside assessment to rate aphasia severity in acute stroke patients in less than 3 minutes. We aimed to adapt and validate this scale for European Portuguese.Material and Methods: We evaluated 56 acute stroke patients in the first and in the seventh days post-stroke. In the seventh day, patients were evaluated by two independent raters, to evaluate inter-rater agreement. To study concurrent validity, the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was applied to a subset of 20 patients. The predictive ability of the Aphasia Rapid Test was assessed at six months, by the aphasia subscale of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.Results: Translation to European Portuguese was based in the French and English versions, considering the words’ utilization frequency. The Chronbach’s alpha was 0.796. The concordance coefficient between the two raters was excellent (0.985). Correlation between Aphasia Rapid Test and the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery was strong (r = -0.958, p < 0.001). The study through Bland-Altman graphs corroborated the good inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity of the test. The Aphasia Rapid Test score in the first day is an independent predictor of long-term outcome.Discussion: This study provides reliable results for European Portuguese, with adequate internal consistency, inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity.Conclusion: The Aphasia Rapid Test is a good tool for the evaluation and monitoring of aphasia in stroke patients.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9090
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/5429
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/6046
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/5431
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/9653
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10086
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10087
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10199
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10200
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9090/10201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 No. 5 (2018): May; 265-271
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 31 N.º 5 (2018): Maio; 265-271
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130647462150144