Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Klijn, Flip
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pais, Joana, Vorsatz, Marc
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25869
Resumo: In the context of school choice, we experimentally study how behavior and outcomes are affected when, instead of submitting rankings in the student-proposing or school proposing deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism, students make decisions dynamically, going through the steps of the underlying algorithms. Our main results show that, contrary to theory, (a) in the dynamic student-proposing DA mechanism, students propose to schools respecting the order of their true preferences slightly more often than in its static version while, (b) in the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism, students react to proposals by always respecting the order and not accepting schools in the tail of their true preferences more often than in the corresponding static version. As a consequence, the dynamic mechanisms outperform their static counterparts in what stability and average payoffs are concerned. In the aggregate, the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism is the best performing mechanism.
id RCAP_33b0af29069d149f571954f32303b37e
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25869
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experimentDynamic School ChoiceDeferred AcceptanceStabilityEfficiencyIn the context of school choice, we experimentally study how behavior and outcomes are affected when, instead of submitting rankings in the student-proposing or school proposing deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism, students make decisions dynamically, going through the steps of the underlying algorithms. Our main results show that, contrary to theory, (a) in the dynamic student-proposing DA mechanism, students propose to schools respecting the order of their true preferences slightly more often than in its static version while, (b) in the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism, students react to proposals by always respecting the order and not accepting schools in the tail of their true preferences more often than in the corresponding static version. As a consequence, the dynamic mechanisms outperform their static counterparts in what stability and average payoffs are concerned. In the aggregate, the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism is the best performing mechanism.ElsevierRepositório da Universidade de LisboaKlijn, FlipPais, JoanaVorsatz, Marc2022-10-31T19:18:38Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25869engKlijn, Flip; Joana Pais, and Marc Vorsatz. (2019). "Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment". Games and Economic Behavior, Vol.113: pp. 147-163. (Search PDF in 2022).0899-82510.1016/j.geb.2018.08.009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-12T01:31:31Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25869Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:09:36.718127Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
title Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
spellingShingle Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
Klijn, Flip
Dynamic School Choice
Deferred Acceptance
Stability
Efficiency
title_short Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
title_full Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
title_fullStr Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
title_full_unstemmed Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
title_sort Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment
author Klijn, Flip
author_facet Klijn, Flip
Pais, Joana
Vorsatz, Marc
author_role author
author2 Pais, Joana
Vorsatz, Marc
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klijn, Flip
Pais, Joana
Vorsatz, Marc
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dynamic School Choice
Deferred Acceptance
Stability
Efficiency
topic Dynamic School Choice
Deferred Acceptance
Stability
Efficiency
description In the context of school choice, we experimentally study how behavior and outcomes are affected when, instead of submitting rankings in the student-proposing or school proposing deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism, students make decisions dynamically, going through the steps of the underlying algorithms. Our main results show that, contrary to theory, (a) in the dynamic student-proposing DA mechanism, students propose to schools respecting the order of their true preferences slightly more often than in its static version while, (b) in the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism, students react to proposals by always respecting the order and not accepting schools in the tail of their true preferences more often than in the corresponding static version. As a consequence, the dynamic mechanisms outperform their static counterparts in what stability and average payoffs are concerned. In the aggregate, the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism is the best performing mechanism.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-10-31T19:18:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25869
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25869
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Klijn, Flip; Joana Pais, and Marc Vorsatz. (2019). "Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment". Games and Economic Behavior, Vol.113: pp. 147-163. (Search PDF in 2022).
0899-825
10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131191737057280