The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, P. M. V.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, R., Wiedenhöft, G., Costa, P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615
Resumo: Nearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying.
id RCAP_41d4cfe2268b59c5066c695fe336dbd9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23615
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interestOrganizational citizenship behaviorSystematic literature reviewOCB dimensionsOCB constructCross-cultural researchNearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying.Elsevier2021-12-02T13:52:08Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-12-02T13:51:41Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615eng2405-844010.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08175Fernandes, P. M. V.Pereira, R.Wiedenhöft, G.Costa, P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:02:03Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23615Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:33:22.034854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
title The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
spellingShingle The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
Fernandes, P. M. V.
Organizational citizenship behavior
Systematic literature review
OCB dimensions
OCB construct
Cross-cultural research
title_short The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
title_full The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
title_fullStr The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
title_full_unstemmed The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
title_sort The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
author Fernandes, P. M. V.
author_facet Fernandes, P. M. V.
Pereira, R.
Wiedenhöft, G.
Costa, P.
author_role author
author2 Pereira, R.
Wiedenhöft, G.
Costa, P.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, P. M. V.
Pereira, R.
Wiedenhöft, G.
Costa, P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Organizational citizenship behavior
Systematic literature review
OCB dimensions
OCB construct
Cross-cultural research
topic Organizational citizenship behavior
Systematic literature review
OCB dimensions
OCB construct
Cross-cultural research
description Nearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-02T13:52:08Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-12-02T13:51:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2405-8440
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08175
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134895490990080