The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615 |
Resumo: | Nearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying. |
id |
RCAP_41d4cfe2268b59c5066c695fe336dbd9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23615 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interestOrganizational citizenship behaviorSystematic literature reviewOCB dimensionsOCB constructCross-cultural researchNearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying.Elsevier2021-12-02T13:52:08Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-12-02T13:51:41Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615eng2405-844010.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08175Fernandes, P. M. V.Pereira, R.Wiedenhöft, G.Costa, P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:02:03Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23615Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:33:22.034854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
title |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
spellingShingle |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest Fernandes, P. M. V. Organizational citizenship behavior Systematic literature review OCB dimensions OCB construct Cross-cultural research |
title_short |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
title_full |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
title_fullStr |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
title_full_unstemmed |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
title_sort |
The individuals' discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest |
author |
Fernandes, P. M. V. |
author_facet |
Fernandes, P. M. V. Pereira, R. Wiedenhöft, G. Costa, P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, R. Wiedenhöft, G. Costa, P. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, P. M. V. Pereira, R. Wiedenhöft, G. Costa, P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Organizational citizenship behavior Systematic literature review OCB dimensions OCB construct Cross-cultural research |
topic |
Organizational citizenship behavior Systematic literature review OCB dimensions OCB construct Cross-cultural research |
description |
Nearly forty years have passed since the term Organizational Citizenship Behavior appeared. Despite a current consensus among scholars about the citizenship gestures as prosocial acts of employees that benefit the organization, it does not apply commonly to the exponential growth of all OCB-related concepts. The concept's expansion has confused the researchers and practitioners, mainly when choosing the most appropriate instruments (constructs) and dimensions to use in their area of interest and context. A systematic literature review was conducted and 420 articles were analyzed. Results point that the trends on OCB-like behaviors goes higher, with an average annual growth rate of new studies of 3.13%. United States (39%) and China (25%) lead but some "under-studied" contexts like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Oceania start being studied towards OCB. New trends appear in the spectrum of the many different domains and disciplines related to OCB, while leadership and task performance remain the most studied domains and disciplines. In future studies, researchers must freely choose the OCB dimensions and constructs they want to use or adapt to meet their needs and research needs since there is no written rule about their use, only the care to be taken with the context and discipline studying. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-02T13:52:08Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2021-12-02T13:51:41Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23615 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2405-8440 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08175 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134895490990080 |