Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leite, Barbara R.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vieira, Pedro E., Troncoso, Jesús S., Costa, Filipe O.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79970
Resumo: DNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked.
id RCAP_426dcdcb695294ea18162a9e4f91227e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/79970
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebratesCOI18SDNA metabarcodingmarine macrozoobenthic diversityprimer efficiencytaxonomic discriminationCiências Naturais::Ciências BiológicasDNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked.project ATLANTIDA – Platform for the monitoring of the North Atlantic Ocean and tools for the sustainable exploitation of the marine resources, with the reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000040, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (NORTE 2020). BRL benefitted from an FCT fellowship PD/BD/127994/2016. The authors would like to thank Sofia Duarte (University of Minho) for the availability and support during practical stages of the research.Pensoft PublishersUniversidade do MinhoLeite, Barbara R.Vieira, Pedro E.Troncoso, Jesús S.Costa, Filipe O.20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/79970engLeite, B. R., Vieira, P. E., Troncoso, J. S., & Costa, F. O. (2021). Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates. MBMG Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 3968.2534-970810.3897/mbmg.5.70063https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/70063/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:30:31Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/79970Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:25:43.023958Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
title Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
spellingShingle Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
Leite, Barbara R.
COI
18S
DNA metabarcoding
marine macrozoobenthic diversity
primer efficiency
taxonomic discrimination
Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas
title_short Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
title_full Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
title_fullStr Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
title_full_unstemmed Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
title_sort Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
author Leite, Barbara R.
author_facet Leite, Barbara R.
Vieira, Pedro E.
Troncoso, Jesús S.
Costa, Filipe O.
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Pedro E.
Troncoso, Jesús S.
Costa, Filipe O.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leite, Barbara R.
Vieira, Pedro E.
Troncoso, Jesús S.
Costa, Filipe O.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COI
18S
DNA metabarcoding
marine macrozoobenthic diversity
primer efficiency
taxonomic discrimination
Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas
topic COI
18S
DNA metabarcoding
marine macrozoobenthic diversity
primer efficiency
taxonomic discrimination
Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas
description DNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79970
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79970
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Leite, B. R., Vieira, P. E., Troncoso, J. S., & Costa, F. O. (2021). Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates. MBMG Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 3968.
2534-9708
10.3897/mbmg.5.70063
https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/70063/
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pensoft Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pensoft Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132742080790528