Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79987 |
Resumo: | DNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked. |
id |
RCAP_b5a3cc4fda407c4c67ef503a6bcbbf26 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/79987 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates18SCOIDNA metabarcodingMarine macrozoobenthic diversityPrimer efficiencyTaxonomic discriminationCiências Naturais::Ciências BiológicasDNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked.This work was supported by the project ATLANTIDA – Platform for the monitoring of the North Atlantic Ocean and tools for the sustainable exploitation of the marine resources, with the reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000040, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (NORTE 2020). BRL benefitted from an FCT fellowship PD/BD/127994/2016. The authors would like to thank Sofia Duarte (University of Minho) for the availability and support during practical stages of the research.Pensoft PublishersUniversidade do MinhoLeite, Barbara R.Vieira, Pedro Emanuel Ferreira ReisTroncoso, Jesús S.Costa, Filipe O.2021-01-012021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/79987engLeite BR, Vieira PE, Troncoso JS, Costa FO (2021) Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e70063. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.700632534-970810.3897/MBMG.5.70063https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/70063/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:18:05Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/79987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:10:49.246760Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
title |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
spellingShingle |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates Leite, Barbara R. 18S COI DNA metabarcoding Marine macrozoobenthic diversity Primer efficiency Taxonomic discrimination Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas |
title_short |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
title_full |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
title_fullStr |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
title_sort |
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates |
author |
Leite, Barbara R. |
author_facet |
Leite, Barbara R. Vieira, Pedro Emanuel Ferreira Reis Troncoso, Jesús S. Costa, Filipe O. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Pedro Emanuel Ferreira Reis Troncoso, Jesús S. Costa, Filipe O. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leite, Barbara R. Vieira, Pedro Emanuel Ferreira Reis Troncoso, Jesús S. Costa, Filipe O. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
18S COI DNA metabarcoding Marine macrozoobenthic diversity Primer efficiency Taxonomic discrimination Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas |
topic |
18S COI DNA metabarcoding Marine macrozoobenthic diversity Primer efficiency Taxonomic discrimination Ciências Naturais::Ciências Biológicas |
description |
DNA metabarcoding has great potential to improve marine biomonitoring programs by providing a rapid and accurate assessment of species composition in zoobenthic communities. However, some methodological improvements are still required, especially regarding failed detections, primers efficiency and incompleteness of databases. Here we assessed the efficiency of two different marker loci (COI and 18S) and three primer pairs in marine species detection through DNA metabarcoding of the macrozoobenthic communities colonizing three types of artificial substrates (slate, PVC and granite), sampled between 3 and 15 months of deployment. To accurately compare detection success between markers, we also compared the representativeness of the detected species in public databases and revised the reliability of the taxonomic assignments. Globally, we recorded extensive complementarity in the species detected by each marker, with 69% of the species exclusively detected by either 18S or COI. Individually, each of the three primer pairs recovered, at most, 52% of all species detected on the samples, showing also different abilities to amplify specific taxonomic groups. Most of the detected species have reliable reference sequences in their respective databases (82% for COI and 72% for 18S), meaning that when a species was detected by one marker and not by the other, it was most likely due to faulty amplification, and not by lack of matching sequences in the database. Overall, results showed the impact of marker and primer applied on species detection ability and indicated that, currently, if only a single marker or primer pair is employed in marine zoobenthos metabarcoding, a fair portion of the diversity may be overlooked. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79987 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79987 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Leite BR, Vieira PE, Troncoso JS, Costa FO (2021) Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e70063. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.70063 2534-9708 10.3897/MBMG.5.70063 https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/70063/ |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132538273267712 |