Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carecho, Judite
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Anabela, Soares, Rute
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469
Resumo: The purpose of this case study is to understand students’ perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision processes that occurred in a formal teaching context of Portuguese as Foreign Language. The participants were two groups of adult students with different native languages who attended a writing course (B1-level of CEFR) in the spring semester of 2018/2019. The data under analysis are the results of the questionnaire the students answered at the end of the semester, regarding their perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision procedures, as far as their usefulness for language learning and related emotional aspects are concerned. The individual writing activities involved in the study included mainly reports of past events and written interaction (formal and informal emails). After writing their texts, the students received them with teacher feedback (in form of graphic marking and eventually short comments) and were asked to correct/rewrite them. The study analyzes the students’ answers and the results indicate that students find writing activities and teacher feedback useful for language learning and prefer indirect feedback, which provides them hints to correct errors themselves. The most diverse answers are those related to the emotional aspects (nervousness associated with feedback and correction) and the answer variability is apparently due to individual factors.
id RCAP_42fa946eb510eb0dc1894b04dd272618
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/17469
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case studyFeedback do professor e (re)escrita em PLNM: a perspetiva dos alunos num estudo de casoThe purpose of this case study is to understand students’ perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision processes that occurred in a formal teaching context of Portuguese as Foreign Language. The participants were two groups of adult students with different native languages who attended a writing course (B1-level of CEFR) in the spring semester of 2018/2019. The data under analysis are the results of the questionnaire the students answered at the end of the semester, regarding their perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision procedures, as far as their usefulness for language learning and related emotional aspects are concerned. The individual writing activities involved in the study included mainly reports of past events and written interaction (formal and informal emails). After writing their texts, the students received them with teacher feedback (in form of graphic marking and eventually short comments) and were asked to correct/rewrite them. The study analyzes the students’ answers and the results indicate that students find writing activities and teacher feedback useful for language learning and prefer indirect feedback, which provides them hints to correct errors themselves. The most diverse answers are those related to the emotional aspects (nervousness associated with feedback and correction) and the answer variability is apparently due to individual factors.L’étude de cas que nous présentons ici vise à comprendre la perception des apprenants sur les activités d’écriture et sur la rétroaction corrective et révision de leurs textes dans un cadre d’enseignement formel de Portugais Langue Non Maternelle (PLNM). Notre étude porte sur deux groupes d’élèves adultes parlant des langues maternelles différentes, dans un cours d’écriture (niveau B1 du CECRL) durant le 2ème semestre 2018-2019. Les données analysées ci-dessous sont les réponses des élèves à l’enquête finale portant sur leurs perceptions soit vis-à-vis l’utilité (pour l’apprentissage) des tâches réalisées tout au long du semestre (notamment les productions écrites, la rétroaction corrective et la révision de leurs textes), soit sur des questions émotionnelles qui leurs sont attachées. Les activités d’écriture sur lesquelles se base cette étude étaient des tâches individuelles réalisées en classe, surtout des récits au passé et des interactions écrites (e-mails formels et informels). Après la rédaction, les apprenants recevaient leurs textes sur papier avec des annotations écrites – soit sous forme graphique soit comme mot/commentaire – et ils étaient priés de corriger ou réécrire leurs textes. Selon les résultats de l’enquête, les apprenants voient les activités d’écriture et la rétroaction corrective de l’enseignant comme utiles pour l’apprentissage langagier. Les étudiants préfèrent la forme de rétroaction indirecte, où les erreurs sont signalées mais c’est à eux de faire la révision/correction. Les réponses moins homogènes concernent les effets émotionnels de la rétroaction corrective (nervosité face aux erreurs et procédures de correction) qui semblent être reliés à des caractéristiques individuelles des apprenants.O estudo de caso que apresentamos tem como objetivo compreender a perceção dos alunos sobre as atividades de escrita e a correção e revisão de texto realizadas em contexto de ensino formal de Português Língua Não Materna (PLNM). Trata-se de dois grupos de alunos adultos, com línguas maternas diversas, que frequentaram no 2.º semestre de 2018/2019 uma disciplina de Comunicação Escrita no nível B1 (QECRL). Os dados em análise são as respostas dos alunos aos questionários finais, incidindo sobre as suas perceções relativamente à utilidade das atividades realizadas ao longo do semestre (nomeadamente as produções escritas, o feedback dos docentes e a revisão dos seus textos) para a aprendizagem, bem como sobre aspetos emocionais associados a esses procedimentos. As atividades de escrita em que se baseia o estudo eram tarefas individuais realizadas em aula e abarcavam essencialmente relatos no passado e interações escritas (emails formais e informais). Após a redação, os alunos recebiam os seus textos em papel com anotações escritas – apenas gráficas ou como palavra/comentário –, sendo-lhes solicitado que os corrigissem ou reescrevessem. De acordo com os resultados dos inquéritos, os alunos consideram as atividades de escrita úteis para a aprendizagem da língua, assim como a correção dos textos pela docente, havendo uma preferência pelo feedback indireto, em que a docente assinala os erros, mas deixa aos alunos a tarefa de os corrigir. As respostas mais díspares dizem respeito aos efeitos emocionais da correção (nervosismo perante erros e procedimentos de correção) e estão aparentemente relacionados com características individuais dos alunos.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2020-06-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 2 (2020); 159-180Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2020); 159-180Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 2 (2020); 159-180Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 2 (2020); 159-1801647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/17469https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/17469/12471Carecho, JuditeFernandes, AnabelaSoares, Ruteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:18:40Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/17469Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:25.021670Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
Feedback do professor e (re)escrita em PLNM: a perspetiva dos alunos num estudo de caso
title Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
spellingShingle Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
Carecho, Judite
title_short Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
title_full Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
title_fullStr Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
title_full_unstemmed Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
title_sort Teacher feedback and (re)writing in Portuguese as a Foreign Language: students’ perspective in a case study
author Carecho, Judite
author_facet Carecho, Judite
Fernandes, Anabela
Soares, Rute
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Anabela
Soares, Rute
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carecho, Judite
Fernandes, Anabela
Soares, Rute
description The purpose of this case study is to understand students’ perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision processes that occurred in a formal teaching context of Portuguese as Foreign Language. The participants were two groups of adult students with different native languages who attended a writing course (B1-level of CEFR) in the spring semester of 2018/2019. The data under analysis are the results of the questionnaire the students answered at the end of the semester, regarding their perceptions of the writing activities and of the feedback and text revision procedures, as far as their usefulness for language learning and related emotional aspects are concerned. The individual writing activities involved in the study included mainly reports of past events and written interaction (formal and informal emails). After writing their texts, the students received them with teacher feedback (in form of graphic marking and eventually short comments) and were asked to correct/rewrite them. The study analyzes the students’ answers and the results indicate that students find writing activities and teacher feedback useful for language learning and prefer indirect feedback, which provides them hints to correct errors themselves. The most diverse answers are those related to the emotional aspects (nervousness associated with feedback and correction) and the answer variability is apparently due to individual factors.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i2.17469
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/17469
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/17469/12471
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 2 (2020); 159-180
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2020); 159-180
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 2 (2020); 159-180
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 2 (2020); 159-180
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133572289789952