Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens, Strieder, Roseline Beatriz, da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117
Resumo: This text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and dif­ferences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students.
id RCAP_470b70a0629442b64677eac4191f3961
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/32117
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferencesScience-Technologie-Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques: similitudes et différencesCiência-Tecnologia-Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas: semelhanças e diferençasThis text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and dif­ferences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students.Ce texte visait à répondre à la recherche suivante suivante : Quelles sont les similitudes et les différences entre les différentes perspectives de l’enseignement des sciences, appelées Science-Technologie et Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques? Ainsi, notre objectif était de comprendre quelles sont les spécificités des trois orientations pédagogiques, qui les différencient, ainsi que de trouver à quel point elles convergent. Afin d’atteindre cet objectif, une Analyse Textuelle Discursive a été réalisée à partir des travaux publiés dans les procès-verbaux des Rencontre Nationale de Recherche en Éducation Scientifique (Enpec) dans les éditions 2011 à 2021. Avec notre analyse, nous avons observé que les propositions alignées sur le LS mettent l’accent sur la connaissance des sciences naturelles, préparant l’étudiant à prendre des décisions impliquant la science et la technologie. Le propositions STS présentent différentes préoccupations, telles que la conceptualisation scientifique, les impacts sociaux et le développement d’actions et/ou de capacités argumentatives. Dans les propositions du QSS, la préoccupation centrale est le développement de la capacité argumentative. Enfin, nous concluons que les trois lignes directrices prévoient des subventions différentes pour les enseignants désireux de contribuer à l’éducation à la citoyenneté des élèves.Este texto procurou responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa: Quais são as semelhanças e diferenças entre as distintas perspectivas de educação em Ciências, denominadas Ciência-Tecnologia- Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas? Dessa forma, nosso objetivo foi compreender quais são as especificidades das três orientações educativas que as diferenciam, bem como encontrar em que ponto convergem. Para se atingir esse objetivo foi realizada uma Análise Textual Discursiva de trabalhos publicados nas Atas do Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Enpec) nas edições de 2011 a 2021. Com a nossa análise, observamos que as propostas alinhadas com a AC enfatizam os conhecimentos das ciências da natureza, preparando o estudante para deliberações que envolvam Ciência e Tecnologia. As propostas CTS apresentam inquietações diversas, como a conceituação científica, os impactos sociais e o desenvolvimento de ações e/ou capacidade argumentativa. Já nas propostas QSC, a preocupação central está no desenvolvimento da capacidade argumentativa. Por fim, concluímos que as três orientações fornecem diferentes subsídios para professores dispostos a contribuir com a formação cidadã dos estudantes.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2023-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117Indagatio Didactica; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; vol. 15 n.º 1 (2023); 43-581647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117/21953http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Rafael Abdala MendonçaMachado, Patrícia Fernandes LootensStrieder, Roseline Beatrizda Silva, Roberto Ribeiro2023-09-22T10:19:29Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/32117Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:33.783351Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
Science-Technologie-Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques: similitudes et différences
Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas: semelhanças e diferenças
title Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
spellingShingle Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça
title_short Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
title_full Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
title_fullStr Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
title_full_unstemmed Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
title_sort Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
author Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça
author_facet Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça
Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens
Strieder, Roseline Beatriz
da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens
Strieder, Roseline Beatriz
da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça
Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens
Strieder, Roseline Beatriz
da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro
description This text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and dif­ferences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117/21953
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2023); 43-58
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 15 n.º 1 (2023); 43-58
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133574260064256