Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117 |
Resumo: | This text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and differences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students. |
id |
RCAP_470b70a0629442b64677eac4191f3961 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/32117 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferencesScience-Technologie-Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques: similitudes et différencesCiência-Tecnologia-Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas: semelhanças e diferençasThis text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and differences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students.Ce texte visait à répondre à la recherche suivante suivante : Quelles sont les similitudes et les différences entre les différentes perspectives de l’enseignement des sciences, appelées Science-Technologie et Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques? Ainsi, notre objectif était de comprendre quelles sont les spécificités des trois orientations pédagogiques, qui les différencient, ainsi que de trouver à quel point elles convergent. Afin d’atteindre cet objectif, une Analyse Textuelle Discursive a été réalisée à partir des travaux publiés dans les procès-verbaux des Rencontre Nationale de Recherche en Éducation Scientifique (Enpec) dans les éditions 2011 à 2021. Avec notre analyse, nous avons observé que les propositions alignées sur le LS mettent l’accent sur la connaissance des sciences naturelles, préparant l’étudiant à prendre des décisions impliquant la science et la technologie. Le propositions STS présentent différentes préoccupations, telles que la conceptualisation scientifique, les impacts sociaux et le développement d’actions et/ou de capacités argumentatives. Dans les propositions du QSS, la préoccupation centrale est le développement de la capacité argumentative. Enfin, nous concluons que les trois lignes directrices prévoient des subventions différentes pour les enseignants désireux de contribuer à l’éducation à la citoyenneté des élèves.Este texto procurou responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa: Quais são as semelhanças e diferenças entre as distintas perspectivas de educação em Ciências, denominadas Ciência-Tecnologia- Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas? Dessa forma, nosso objetivo foi compreender quais são as especificidades das três orientações educativas que as diferenciam, bem como encontrar em que ponto convergem. Para se atingir esse objetivo foi realizada uma Análise Textual Discursiva de trabalhos publicados nas Atas do Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Enpec) nas edições de 2011 a 2021. Com a nossa análise, observamos que as propostas alinhadas com a AC enfatizam os conhecimentos das ciências da natureza, preparando o estudante para deliberações que envolvam Ciência e Tecnologia. As propostas CTS apresentam inquietações diversas, como a conceituação científica, os impactos sociais e o desenvolvimento de ações e/ou capacidade argumentativa. Já nas propostas QSC, a preocupação central está no desenvolvimento da capacidade argumentativa. Por fim, concluímos que as três orientações fornecem diferentes subsídios para professores dispostos a contribuir com a formação cidadã dos estudantes.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2023-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117Indagatio Didactica; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58Indagatio Didactica; vol. 15 n.º 1 (2023); 43-581647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117/21953http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Rafael Abdala MendonçaMachado, Patrícia Fernandes LootensStrieder, Roseline Beatrizda Silva, Roberto Ribeiro2023-09-22T10:19:29Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/32117Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:33.783351Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences Science-Technologie-Société, Littératie Scientifique et Questions Socio-Scientifiques: similitudes et différences Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade, Alfabetização Científica e Questões Sociocientíficas: semelhanças e diferenças |
title |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
spellingShingle |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça |
title_short |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
title_full |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
title_fullStr |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
title_sort |
Science-Technology-Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-Scientific Issues: similarities and diferences |
author |
Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens Strieder, Roseline Beatriz da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens Strieder, Roseline Beatriz da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Rafael Abdala Mendonça Machado, Patrícia Fernandes Lootens Strieder, Roseline Beatriz da Silva, Roberto Ribeiro |
description |
This text sought to answer the following research question: What are the similarities and differences between the different perspectives of science education, called Science-Technology and Society, Scientific Literacy and Socio-scientific Issues? In this way, our objective was to understand what are the specificities of the three educational orientations, which differentiate them, as well as to find at what point they converge. In order to achieve this objective, a Discursive Textual Analysis was carried out of works published in the annals of the National Meeting of Research in Science Education (Enpec) in the 2011 to 2021 editions. The STS proposals present different concerns, such as scientific conceptualization, social impacts and the development of actions and/or argumentative capacity. In the SSI proposals, the central concern is in the development of the argumentative capacity. Finally, we concluded that the three guidelines provide different subsidies for teachers willing to contribute to the citizenship education of students. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117 https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v15i1.32117 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/32117/21953 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Indagatio Didactica; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2023); 43-58 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 15 No 1 (2023); 43-58 Indagatio Didactica; vol. 15 n.º 1 (2023); 43-58 1647-3582 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133574260064256 |