Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, V.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, M. H., Rosa, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23344
Resumo: Gender equality is a matter for debate worldwide. In 2018, Portugal enacted legislation (Decree Law no. 62/2017) to balance gender representation on the executive boards of listed and public sector organizations with measures similar to those causing controversies in other countries. Thus, in accordance with previous research, a study took place to examine the attitudes towards the justice of this legislation and the role of merit in these attitudes. This study (n = 129 women and 94 men) deployed an experimentally manipulative type of affirmative action program to consider the role of individual perceptions of the justice of the legislation coupled with the influence of beliefs in meritocracy and participant gender. The results identify how the type of affirmative action impacted on the perceived justice, also influenced by merit, which seems normative and fundamental to evaluating the justice of such legally stipulated provisions. Nonetheless, objectively evaluating candidate merits revealed difficulties in disentangling this process from personality traits.
id RCAP_479813c7527053895aa0f94a0516a9e9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23344
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislationLaw number 62/2017Gender in/equalityAffirmative actionMeritocracyGender equality is a matter for debate worldwide. In 2018, Portugal enacted legislation (Decree Law no. 62/2017) to balance gender representation on the executive boards of listed and public sector organizations with measures similar to those causing controversies in other countries. Thus, in accordance with previous research, a study took place to examine the attitudes towards the justice of this legislation and the role of merit in these attitudes. This study (n = 129 women and 94 men) deployed an experimentally manipulative type of affirmative action program to consider the role of individual perceptions of the justice of the legislation coupled with the influence of beliefs in meritocracy and participant gender. The results identify how the type of affirmative action impacted on the perceived justice, also influenced by merit, which seems normative and fundamental to evaluating the justice of such legally stipulated provisions. Nonetheless, objectively evaluating candidate merits revealed difficulties in disentangling this process from personality traits.MDPI2021-10-15T16:16:32Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-11-25T09:10:09Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/23344eng2076-076010.3390/socsci10100386Silva, V.Santos, M. H.Rosa, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:48:56Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23344Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T03:48:56Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
title Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
spellingShingle Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
Silva, V.
Law number 62/2017
Gender in/equality
Affirmative action
Meritocracy
title_short Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
title_full Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
title_fullStr Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
title_full_unstemmed Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
title_sort Does she deserve it? The influence of gender and meritocracy in reactions to affirmative action legislation
author Silva, V.
author_facet Silva, V.
Santos, M. H.
Rosa, M.
author_role author
author2 Santos, M. H.
Rosa, M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, V.
Santos, M. H.
Rosa, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law number 62/2017
Gender in/equality
Affirmative action
Meritocracy
topic Law number 62/2017
Gender in/equality
Affirmative action
Meritocracy
description Gender equality is a matter for debate worldwide. In 2018, Portugal enacted legislation (Decree Law no. 62/2017) to balance gender representation on the executive boards of listed and public sector organizations with measures similar to those causing controversies in other countries. Thus, in accordance with previous research, a study took place to examine the attitudes towards the justice of this legislation and the role of merit in these attitudes. This study (n = 129 women and 94 men) deployed an experimentally manipulative type of affirmative action program to consider the role of individual perceptions of the justice of the legislation coupled with the influence of beliefs in meritocracy and participant gender. The results identify how the type of affirmative action impacted on the perceived justice, also influenced by merit, which seems normative and fundamental to evaluating the justice of such legally stipulated provisions. Nonetheless, objectively evaluating candidate merits revealed difficulties in disentangling this process from personality traits.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-15T16:16:32Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-11-25T09:10:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23344
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23344
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2076-0760
10.3390/socsci10100386
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817546545812209664